Now confirmed that Trump is putting innocent children in cages

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
60,438
9,585
113
Washington DC
Here's a good one...


Members of United Methodist Church Charge Jeff Sessions With ‘Child Abuse,’ ‘Racism’ & ‘Immorality’

In addition to his role in the Trump administration, Attorney General Jeff Sessions works as a Sunday school teacher at the Ashland Place United Methodist Church in Mobile, Alabama.
But in light of the growing controversy over the “zero tolerance” border policy, which Sessions announced last month, hundreds of members of the United Methodist Church are demanding Sessions be charged with child abuse for violating church doctrine.


More: https://secondnexus.com/news/method...2&tse_id=INF_84c5ec30741c11e88fd7d54564f8ca52

You're more interested in the theatre than the reality, aren't you, Cliffy?

So don't say you and Spanky don't have anything in common.
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
"Innocent children" is an assumption not supported by preliminary ground based intel alone,

I hope they eat America. And you thought biological warfare was science fiction TV
 

Colpy

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 5, 2005
21,887
848
113
70
Saint John, N.B.
Ben Shapiro, lol

Next up, Joe Rogaine, Jordan Tweeterson and Stephen Fly.


Whatabout the next Alex Jones-lite?


Alexd Jones is a lunatic, but that still makes him saner than you.


Jordan Peterson (funy how his detractors can't fight his views, they can only insult) is one of the pre-eminent intellectuals in the world right now, is a clinical psychologist, was a lecturer at Harvard and at U of T. Guess what? Smarter than you.


Obviously you watched the Munk Debate....Stephen Fry......smarter than you.


Oh well, keep shooting high. :)
 

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
60,438
9,585
113
Washington DC
Jordan Peterson (funy how his detractors can't fight his views, they can only insult) is one of the pre-eminent intellectuals in the world right now, is a clinical psychologist, was a lecturer at Harvard and at U of T. Guess what? Smarter than you.

Yeah, smart enough to say "Don't be dependent. On anyone. Ever."

He works at a university, he lives in a city, and he claims to have multiple health problems. His entire life is a web of dependency. Anybody who can't understand that is not smart, and anyone who understands it but denies it is a liar.
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
Alexd Jones is a lunatic, but that still makes him saner than you.


Jordan Peterson (funy how his detractors can't fight his views, they can only insult) is one of the pre-eminent intellectuals in the world right now, is a clinical psychologist, was a lecturer at Harvard and at U of T. Guess what? Smarter than you.


Obviously you watched the Munk Debate....Stephen Fry......smarter than you.


Oh well, keep shooting high. :)


I have several cats that are smarter than he is. Yer picking on a mental cripple Colpy.
 

taxslave

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 25, 2008
36,362
4,340
113
Vancouver Island
Hi! Cliffy

The U.S. just recently suffered another humiliating defeat at the United Nations and is totally embarrassed. I have been saying many times within these forums, that the U.S. and NATO members (including Associate Members
General Assembly Adopts Resolution on Protecting Palestinian Civilians Following Rejection of United States Amendment to Condemn Hamas Rocket Firelike Israel) intend to leave the UN as China takes its rightful place upon the world stage. A new modern United Nations complex will be built in Shanghai because the New York building is ancient .

‘We Cannot Remain Silent’ in Face of Recent Gaza Violence, Palestine Observer Says
In an emergency meeting, the General Assembly today adopted a resolution deploring the use of excessive, disproportionate and indiscriminate force by Israeli forces against Palestinian civilians in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, and particularly the Gaza Strip.
By the text titled “Protection of the Palestinian civilian population” — adopted by a vote of 120 in favour to 8 against with 45 abstentions — the Assembly demanded that Israel refrain from such actions and fully abide by its legal obligations under the Fourth Geneva Convention relating to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War, of 12 August 1949.
United Nations General Assembly
June 13, 2018
https://www.un.org/press/en/2018/ga12028.doc.htm
(YouTube Video)

And previously ..... March 2018

Following a month-long 37th session in Geneva, the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) approved five ‘anti-Israel’ resolutions. One of the resolutions, titled 'Ensuring accountability and justice for all violations of international law in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem', condemned “all violations of human rights and of international humanitarian law” against Palestinians.

Acknowledging the “widespread and unprecedented levels of destruction, death and human suffering” in the occupied territories, the UNHRC urged member states to stop selling arms to Tel Aviv.

Four other Israel-related decisions which the UNHRC passed on Friday included a resolution which calls on Tel Aviv to withdraw from the Golan Heights, while another sought Palestinian self-determination along the 1967 borders. The fourth resolution condemned Israeli settlements, while the final document slammed Tel Aviv for human rights abuses against the Palestinians.

All of the resolutions denounced the policies which Washington has been increasingly neglecting, and tacitly supporting, under the Donald Trump administration. Haley has called the council’s actions “foolish” and “grossly biased” against Israel.

Human rights situation in Palestine and other occupied Arab territories
Ensuring accountability and justice for all violations of international law in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem
UN Human Rights Council
March 22, 2018
https://unispal.un.org/DPA/DPR/unispal.nsf/0/A08070A0F3BEFEB185257F86004C38FE

Tweet:
US Mission to the UN
Amb. Haley: When the Human Rights Council treats Israel worse than North Korea, Iran, & Syria, it is the Council itself that is foolish and unworthy of its name...Today’s actions make clear that the organization lacks the credibility needed to be a true advocate for human rights.
March 23, 2018
https://twitter.com/USUN/status/977224577137938437

THe UN has become a joke overrun by countries that do not believe in human rights.

We would be well advised to bail out.

The sad part is that they don't even se the difference between immigrants and drug smugglers.

All must be treated the same.

Is it a surprise the white nationalist climate change deniers support kidnapping children?

Does not surprise me in the least,

Are your parental units brother and sister? Or is your father also your brother? That would explain your LMC.
There are no immigrants involved. Immigrants go through the process of applying for residency, they don't break in and demand services.

Are you suggesting that both Israel and the U.S. are not the very worst human rights offenders?

Remember the "Illegal" Iraq war which resulted in more than a million deaths and the "Illegal" invasion of Syria?

Remember the blockade of Gaza by Israel. Has Israel ever honoured any UN resolutions?

I would guess that every country in the entire world has human rights violations.

Just look at how Canada treats its aboriginals.

THe best ones in the UN. You represent all that is wrong with the UN. Noww go play with your brother's goat.
 

pgs

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 29, 2008
28,581
8,164
113
B.C.
Nope, picking and choosing facts is hate. And how you present them is hate.

For example, if Indians have problems, and you spend millions, and it doesn't seem to do any good, it's concern if you care about the problems. It's hate if you only care about the money.

But that's OK, sit back and enjoy the sight of Spanky climbing his wide ass down from the tower of lies he vomited up. Maybe he'll slip and crush Nazi Barbie.
When the bulk of the money is being spent on lawyers and band council nepotism , with little trickling down to the rank and file band members it gets easy to look at the situation with a jaundiced eye .
 

Colpy

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 5, 2005
21,887
848
113
70
Saint John, N.B.
Yeah, smart enough to say "Don't be dependent. On anyone. Ever."

He works at a university, he lives in a city, and he claims to have multiple health problems. His entire life is a web of dependency. Anybody who can't understand that is not smart, and anyone who understands it but denies it is a liar.


WTF?


Read my post below, then produce, or STFU.
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
THe UN has become a joke overrun by countries that do not believe in human rights.

We would be well advised to bail out.



Are your parental units brother and sister? Or is your father also your brother? That would explain your LMC.
There are no immigrants involved. Immigrants go through the process of applying for residency, they don't break in and demand services.



THe best ones in the UN. You represent all that is wrong with the UN. Noww go play with your brother's goat.
4 minutes ago by pgs
I agree.
 

Durry

House Member
May 18, 2010
4,709
286
83
Canada
I have a question.

If America is so evil...putting children in cages, etc. Then why do these people want to come to this country in the first place?

It’s because these scum ball Mexicans want to take advantage of America’s generosity and use it to their advantage to get in and be looked after by the Americans
 

Kreskin

Doctor of Thinkology
Feb 23, 2006
21,155
149
63
I have a question.

If America is so evil...putting children in cages, etc. Then why do these people want to come to this country in the first place?
Many of them are refugees from Central America. My question to you is why is Trump hell bent on destabilizing the economy of Mexico if he doesn't want more border problems?
 

Durry

House Member
May 18, 2010
4,709
286
83
Canada
Many of them are refugees from Central America. My question to you is why is Trump hell bent on destabilizing the economy of Mexico if he doesn't want more border problems?

How is he destabilizing their economy?

It’s a shithole, what is there to destabilize?
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
How is he destabilizing their economy?

It’s a shithole, what is there to destabilize?


And then there is State cannibalism. Ultimately the USA will eat itself and it will be televised, and I hope not to miss one episode,


Imerpial decline, episode one, season one, Vietnam, made a lot of tax payer money, now they hate you, and they,re hungry, hundreds upon thousands of them, good luck.

It,s just a simple matter of the number of tanks, and it,s all down hi;ll from Canada.
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
548
113
Vernon, B.C.
Alleged Peter Fonda tweet. Apparently Melanoma went crying to the secret service.


"We should rip Barron Trump from his mother's arms and put him in a cage with pedophiles and see if mother will will stand up against the giant a--hole she is married to. 90 million people in the streets on the same weekend in the country. F---,"

How do pedophiles have any bearing on this situation? Who was assaulted by a pedophile? Idiots should stay out of these discussions! :lol:
 

Kreskin

Doctor of Thinkology
Feb 23, 2006
21,155
149
63
Have you heard that children were separated from their parents under Obama & Clinton? Then, you need a little Facts vs Myths lesson. Michelle Martin, PhD Cal State Fullerton summed up the most important FACTS:

There is so much misinformation out there about the Trump administration's new "zero tolerance" policy that requires criminal prosecution, which then warrants the separating of parents and children at the border. Before responding to a post defending this policy, please do your research...As a professor at a local Cal State, I research and write about these issues, so here, I'll make it easier for you:

Myth: This is not a new policy and was practiced under Obama and Clinton - FALSE. The policy to separate parents and children is new and was instituted on 4/6/2018. It was the brainchild of John Kelly and Stephen Miller to serve as a deterrent for undocumented immigration, approved by Trump, and adopted by Sessions. Prior administrations detained migrant families, but didn’t have a practice of forcibly separating parents from their children unless the adults were deemed unfit.

Myth: This is the only way to deter undocumented immigration - FALSE. Annual trends show that arrests for undocumented entry are at a 46 year low, and undocumented crossings dropped in 2007, with a net loss (more people leaving than arriving). Deportations have increased steadily though (spiking in 1996 and more recently), because several laws that were passed since 1996 have made it legally more difficult to gain legal status for people already here, and thus increased their deportations (I address this later under the myth that it's the Democrats' fault). What we mostly have now are people crossing the border illegally because they've already been hired by a US company, or because they are seeking political asylum. Economic migrants come to this country because our country has kept the demand going. But again, many of these people impacted by Trump's "zero tolerance" policy appear to be political asylum-seekers.

Myth: Most of the people coming across the border are just trying to take advantage of our country by taking our jobs - FALSE. Most of the parents who have been impacted by Trump's "zero tolerance" policy have presented themselves as political asylum-seekers at a U.S. port-of-entry, from El Salvador, Guatemala, and Honduras. Rather than processing their claims, they have been taken into custody on the spot and had their children ripped from their arms. The ACLU alleges that this practice violates the Asylum Act, and the UN asserts that it violates the UN Treaty on the State of Refugees, one of the few treaties the US has ratified. This is an illegal act on the part of the United States government, not to mention morally and ethically reprehensible.

Myth: We're a country that respects the Rule of Law, and if people break the law, this is what they get - FALSE. We are a country that has an above-ground system of immigration and an underground system. Our government (under both parties) has always been aware that US companies recruit workers in the poorest parts of Mexico for cheap labor, and ICE (and its predecessor INS) has looked the other way because this underground economy benefits our country to the tune of billions of dollars annually. Thus, even though the majority of people crossing the border now are asylum-seekers, those who are economic migrants (migrant workers) likely have been recruited here to do jobs Americans will not do.

Myth: The children have to be separated from their parents because there parents must be arrested and it would be cruel to put children in jail with their parents - FALSE. First, in the case of economic migrants crossing the border illegally, criminal prosecution has not been the legal norm, and families have been kept together at all cost. Also, crossing the border without documentation is a typically a misdemeanor not requiring arrest, but rather a civil proceeding. Additionally, parents who have been detained have historically been detained with their children in ICE "family residential centers," again, for civil processing. The Trump administration's shift in policy is for political purposes only, not legal ones.

Myth: We have rampant fraud in our asylum process the proof of which is the significant increase we have in the number of people applying for asylum. FALSE. The increase in asylum seekers is a direct result of the increase in civil conflict and violence across the globe. While some people may believe that we shouldn't allow any refugees into our country because "it's not our problem," neither our current asylum law, nor our ideological foundation as a country support such an isolationist approach. There is very little evidence to support Sessions' claim that abuse of our asylum-seeking policies is rampant. Also, what Sessions failed to mention is that the majority of asylum seekers are from China, not South of the border.

Myth: The Democrats caused this, "it's their law." FALSE. Neither the Republicans nor the Democrats caused this, the Trump administration did (although the Republicans could fix this today, and have refused). I believe what this myth refers to is the passage of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act, which were both passed under Clinton in 1996. These laws essentially made unauthorized entry into the US a crime (typically a misdemeanor for first-time offenders), but under both Republicans and Democrats, these cases were handled through civil deportation proceedings, not a criminal proceeding, which did not require separation. And again, even in cases where detainment was required, families were always kept together in family residential centers, unless the parents were deemed unfit (as mentioned above). Thus, Trump's assertion that he hates this policy but has no choice but to separate the parents from their children, because the Democrats "gave us this law" is false and nothing more than propaganda designed to compel negotiation on bad policy.

Myth: The parents and children will be reunited shortly, once the parents' court cases are finalized. FALSE. Criminal court is a vastly different beast than civil court proceedings. Also, the children are being processed as unaccompanied minors ("unaccompanied alien children"), which typically means they are sent into the custody of the Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR), which is part of the Department of Health and Human Services (DHS). Under normal circumstances when a child enters the country without his or her parent, ORR attempts to locate a family member within a few weeks, and the child is then released to a family member, or if a family member cannot be located, the child is placed in a residential center (anywhere in the country), or in some cases, foster care. Prior to Trump's new policy, ORR was operating at 95% capacity, and they simply cannot effectively manage the influx of 2000+ children, some as young as 4 months. Also, keep in mind, these are not unaccompanied minor children, they have parents. There is great legal ambiguity on how and even whether the parents will get their children back because we are in uncharted territory right now. According to the ACLU lawsuit (see below), there is currently no easy vehicle for reuniting parents with their children. Additionally, according to a May 2018 report, numerous cases of verbal, physical and sexual abuse were found to have occurred in these residential centers.

Myth: This policy is legal. LIKELY FALSE. The ACLU filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration on 5/6/18, and a recent court ruling denied the government's motion to dismiss the suit. The judge deciding the case stated that the Trump Administration policy is "brutal, offensive, and fails to comport with traditional notions of fair play and decency." The case is moving forward because it was deemed to have legal merit.
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
How do pedophiles have any bearing on this situation? Who was assaulted by a pedophile? Idiots should stay out of these discussions! :lol:


Void is strange. I hesitate to consider pedophilia, first, when simple brain damage is apparent.


He may have been involved in an horrific traffic accident
 

Walter

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 28, 2007
34,888
126
63
"americas generosity" an example please?


Looked after by Americans! hahahahahahahahh

As true today as it was when first broadcast.

Have you heard that children were separated from their parents under Obama & Clinton? Then, you need a little Facts vs Myths lesson. Michelle Martin, PhD Cal State Fullerton summed up the most important FACTS:

There is so much misinformation out there about the Trump administration's new "zero tolerance" policy that requires criminal prosecution, which then warrants the separating of parents and children at the border. Before responding to a post defending this policy, please do your research...As a professor at a local Cal State, I research and write about these issues, so here, I'll make it easier for you:

Myth: This is not a new policy and was practiced under Obama and Clinton - FALSE. The policy to separate parents and children is new and was instituted on 4/6/2018. It was the brainchild of John Kelly and Stephen Miller to serve as a deterrent for undocumented immigration, approved by Trump, and adopted by Sessions. Prior administrations detained migrant families, but didn’t have a practice of forcibly separating parents from their children unless the adults were deemed unfit.

Myth: This is the only way to deter undocumented immigration - FALSE. Annual trends show that arrests for undocumented entry are at a 46 year low, and undocumented crossings dropped in 2007, with a net loss (more people leaving than arriving). Deportations have increased steadily though (spiking in 1996 and more recently), because several laws that were passed since 1996 have made it legally more difficult to gain legal status for people already here, and thus increased their deportations (I address this later under the myth that it's the Democrats' fault). What we mostly have now are people crossing the border illegally because they've already been hired by a US company, or because they are seeking political asylum. Economic migrants come to this country because our country has kept the demand going. But again, many of these people impacted by Trump's "zero tolerance" policy appear to be political asylum-seekers.

Myth: Most of the people coming across the border are just trying to take advantage of our country by taking our jobs - FALSE. Most of the parents who have been impacted by Trump's "zero tolerance" policy have presented themselves as political asylum-seekers at a U.S. port-of-entry, from El Salvador, Guatemala, and Honduras. Rather than processing their claims, they have been taken into custody on the spot and had their children ripped from their arms. The ACLU alleges that this practice violates the Asylum Act, and the UN asserts that it violates the UN Treaty on the State of Refugees, one of the few treaties the US has ratified. This is an illegal act on the part of the United States government, not to mention morally and ethically reprehensible.

Myth: We're a country that respects the Rule of Law, and if people break the law, this is what they get - FALSE. We are a country that has an above-ground system of immigration and an underground system. Our government (under both parties) has always been aware that US companies recruit workers in the poorest parts of Mexico for cheap labor, and ICE (and its predecessor INS) has looked the other way because this underground economy benefits our country to the tune of billions of dollars annually. Thus, even though the majority of people crossing the border now are asylum-seekers, those who are economic migrants (migrant workers) likely have been recruited here to do jobs Americans will not do.

Myth: The children have to be separated from their parents because there parents must be arrested and it would be cruel to put children in jail with their parents - FALSE. First, in the case of economic migrants crossing the border illegally, criminal prosecution has not been the legal norm, and families have been kept together at all cost. Also, crossing the border without documentation is a typically a misdemeanor not requiring arrest, but rather a civil proceeding. Additionally, parents who have been detained have historically been detained with their children in ICE "family residential centers," again, for civil processing. The Trump administration's shift in policy is for political purposes only, not legal ones.

Myth: We have rampant fraud in our asylum process the proof of which is the significant increase we have in the number of people applying for asylum. FALSE. The increase in asylum seekers is a direct result of the increase in civil conflict and violence across the globe. While some people may believe that we shouldn't allow any refugees into our country because "it's not our problem," neither our current asylum law, nor our ideological foundation as a country support such an isolationist approach. There is very little evidence to support Sessions' claim that abuse of our asylum-seeking policies is rampant. Also, what Sessions failed to mention is that the majority of asylum seekers are from China, not South of the border.

Myth: The Democrats caused this, "it's their law." FALSE. Neither the Republicans nor the Democrats caused this, the Trump administration did (although the Republicans could fix this today, and have refused). I believe what this myth refers to is the passage of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act, which were both passed under Clinton in 1996. These laws essentially made unauthorized entry into the US a crime (typically a misdemeanor for first-time offenders), but under both Republicans and Democrats, these cases were handled through civil deportation proceedings, not a criminal proceeding, which did not require separation. And again, even in cases where detainment was required, families were always kept together in family residential centers, unless the parents were deemed unfit (as mentioned above). Thus, Trump's assertion that he hates this policy but has no choice but to separate the parents from their children, because the Democrats "gave us this law" is false and nothing more than propaganda designed to compel negotiation on bad policy.

Myth: The parents and children will be reunited shortly, once the parents' court cases are finalized. FALSE. Criminal court is a vastly different beast than civil court proceedings. Also, the children are being processed as unaccompanied minors ("unaccompanied alien children"), which typically means they are sent into the custody of the Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR), which is part of the Department of Health and Human Services (DHS). Under normal circumstances when a child enters the country without his or her parent, ORR attempts to locate a family member within a few weeks, and the child is then released to a family member, or if a family member cannot be located, the child is placed in a residential center (anywhere in the country), or in some cases, foster care. Prior to Trump's new policy, ORR was operating at 95% capacity, and they simply cannot effectively manage the influx of 2000+ children, some as young as 4 months. Also, keep in mind, these are not unaccompanied minor children, they have parents. There is great legal ambiguity on how and even whether the parents will get their children back because we are in uncharted territory right now. According to the ACLU lawsuit (see below), there is currently no easy vehicle for reuniting parents with their children. Additionally, according to a May 2018 report, numerous cases of verbal, physical and sexual abuse were found to have occurred in these residential centers.

Myth: This policy is legal. LIKELY FALSE. The ACLU filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration on 5/6/18, and a recent court ruling denied the government's motion to dismiss the suit. The judge deciding the case stated that the Trump Administration policy is "brutal, offensive, and fails to comport with traditional notions of fair play and decency." The case is moving forward because it was deemed to have legal merit.
Complete bullshit.