New Evidence Puts Man In North America 50,000 Years Ago

Cliffy

Standing Member
Nov 19, 2008
44,850
193
63
Nakusp, BC
Radiocarbon tests of carbonized plant remains where artifacts were unearthed last May along the Savannah River in Allendale County by University of South Carolina archaeologist Dr. Albert Goodyear indicate that the sediments containing these artifacts are at least 50,000 years old, meaning that humans inhabited North American long before the last ice age.
The findings are significant because they suggest that humans inhabited North America well before the last ice age more than 20,000 years ago, a potentially explosive revelation in American archaeology.
Goodyear, who has garnered international attention for his discoveries of tools that pre-date what is believed to be humans' arrival in North America, announced the test results, which were done by the University of California at Irvine Laboratory, Wednesday (Nov .17).
"The dates could actually be older," Goodyear says. "Fifty-thousand should be a minimum age since there may be little detectable activity left."


http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2004/11/041118104010.htm


I have been saying this for years. I know this article is 11 years old but it verifies my contention that humans have been here since before the Ice Age. Why are they still teaching the Bering Straight land bridge theory in schools?
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
119,009
14,627
113
Low Earth Orbit
Dr. Albert Goodyear indicate that the sediments containing these artifacts are at least 50,000 years old, meaning that humans inhabited North American long before the last ice age.

The findings are significant because they suggest that humans inhabited North America well before the last ice age more than 20,000 years ago, a potentially explosive revelation in American archaeology


Cliff said:
I have been saying this for years. I know this article is 11 years old but it verifies my contention that humans have been here since before the Ice Age. Why are they still teaching the Bering Straight land bridge theory in schools?
In schools they teach the fact that 50,000 years ago and 20,000 were both in the last ice age which still hasn't ended.

And you have the audacity to make another bold "I see but you can't see the truth because blah blah f-cking blah!" statement of superiority?
 

Johnnny

Frontiersman
Jun 8, 2007
9,388
124
63
Third rock from the Sun
I have been saying this for years. I know this article is 11 years old but it verifies my contention that humans have been here since before the Ice Age. Why are they still teaching the Bering Straight land bridge theory in schools?

Because those people had reservations :lol:
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
The first after the previous was wiped by the comet event twelve thousand eight hundred years ago. The grand canyon was carved then. Mega fauna including mega human was wiped as well at the same time.
 

Cliffy

Standing Member
Nov 19, 2008
44,850
193
63
Nakusp, BC
SO the current "first nations" most probably are not really first after all.
There were many migrations to America over many thousands of years but there was only one invasion. Most likely, many of the the people living today evolved from the original peoples.
 

Cliffy

Standing Member
Nov 19, 2008
44,850
193
63
Nakusp, BC
250000 Year Old Mastodon Hunter From Puebla

Virginia Steen-McIntyre
INTRODUCTION

Archaeologists and anthropologists say the Hueyátlaco site is impossible. In no way were humans actively hunting mammoth and mastodon in the Valsequillo Reservoir area of south-central Mexico a quarter-million years ago. Much less could they produce elegant incised art work. And/or perhaps even nibble on maize.
Geologists say that may be true, at least according to established theory. But then you must explain away: (1) Well made stone tools associated with remains of butchered extinct Pleistocene animals dated by the uranium-series methods at 250,000 years. (2) Overlying (younger) beds of volcanic ejecta (pumice and coarse ash) giving roughly similar zircon fissiontrack dates. (3) Infinite 14C dates (no carbon remains). (4) A primitive human skull, collected in the area over 100 years ago, filled with microfossils (diatoms) including several taxa that either became extinct or first appeared during the Sangamon Interglacial 80,000 to ca 320,000 years ago. (5) A similar Sangamon-age diatom suite collected from the artifact-bearing layers and overlying sediment. (6) A layer of volcanic ash from deep within a sediment core in Mexico City, associated with grains of maize pollen, that might be the same age.


http://gordonwagner.wordpress.com/2010/10/23/250000-year-old-mastodon-hunter-from-puebla/
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
119,009
14,627
113
Low Earth Orbit
Both from South America. African relics and Asian relics.


http://d39ya49a1fwv14.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/olmec1.jpg




https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/e6/Olmec_mask_at_Met.jpg


Who invaded whom Cliff?

250000 Year Old Mastodon Hunter From Puebla

Virginia Steen-McIntyre
INTRODUCTION

Archaeologists and anthropologists say the Hueyátlaco site is impossible. In no way were humans actively hunting mammoth and mastodon in the Valsequillo Reservoir area of south-central Mexico a quarter-million years ago. Much less could they produce elegant incised art work. And/or perhaps even nibble on maize.
Geologists say that may be true, at least according to established theory. But then you must explain away: (1) Well made stone tools associated with remains of butchered extinct Pleistocene animals dated by the uranium-series methods at 250,000 years. (2) Overlying (younger) beds of volcanic ejecta (pumice and coarse ash) giving roughly similar zircon fissiontrack dates. (3) Infinite 14C dates (no carbon remains). (4) A primitive human skull, collected in the area over 100 years ago, filled with microfossils (diatoms) including several taxa that either became extinct or first appeared during the Sangamon Interglacial 80,000 to ca 320,000 years ago. (5) A similar Sangamon-age diatom suite collected from the artifact-bearing layers and overlying sediment. (6) A layer of volcanic ash from deep within a sediment core in Mexico City, associated with grains of maize pollen, that might be the same age.


http://gordonwagner.wordpress.com/2010/10/23/250000-year-old-mastodon-hunter-from-puebla/

Maize huh? 6000 year old maize somehow mysteriously dated to 250,000 years ago huh?

Monsanto?
 

damngrumpy

Executive Branch Member
Mar 16, 2005
9,949
21
38
kelowna bc
Doesn't matter who was here first, the First Naions have laid claim and have
the Title I have no problem with that they were here before our colonial
relatives were and that is what counts
 

Retired_Can_Soldier

The End of the Dog is Coming!
Mar 19, 2006
12,449
1,400
113
60
Alberta
My tribe came over on a boat from Ireland just in time to fight the Great War in Canada's Expeditionary Force.

Story of our lives, we try to get away from Europe and they keep sending us back.
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
Catastrophic historys have to be explained away or they become problematic futures. This is the work of the uniformitarians, scientists with agendas at odds with discovery. Wouldn't we all prefer a mass produced past conforming to rigid manufacturing specification rather than clumsily cobbled together historys dependent on unreliable natural processes often unsuitable to modern sensibilities? Yes of course we would. We don't want to suffer the discomforts of uncertainty do we? Certainly not because if it were to be understood that there has been no linear uniform progression we might be left no choice but to go about naked to the powers that be and forced to whorship the butterfly god of unpredictable chaos. We cannot admit under any circumstances that we have an unassailable master.