Muhammad tops charts as No. 1 baby name in UK

B00Mer

Keep Calm and Carry On
Sep 6, 2008
45,078
7,401
113
Rent Free in Your Head
www.getafteritmedia.com











/////////////////////////////////////////

more here...
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
48,574
1,687
113
Have you considered converting yet??


Nope.

How dare they practice freedom of religion? You'd think the UK respected human rights or something. How terrible.

The UK doesn't have freedom of religion. Not if you're a white Christian, anyway.

Vanity. That is why white women aren't spitting them out like they used to.


No. It's because most white women don't have children if they can't afford to bring them up, apart from the odd Left-winger like Jack Monroe who thinks it's their "lifestyle choice" to have a child they can't afford and allow the taxpayer to pick up the bill. And, of course, most Muslim women likewise just get the taxpayer to pick up the bill for their dirty kids. Three-quarters of Muslim women in Britain don't work, and neither do over half of Muslim men. The vast majority of white men and women, however, are out there working and earning a wage to pay for their kids and other belongings. Muslim women just sh*t out 15 kids a year and get the taxpayer to pay for them

If it's a little girl, it would be nice to have her bundled-up in a wee little burka

Muhammad is still a nice name for a girl, and, it will go a long way to reaching out to the Muslim community as a sign of respect


Muhammad is a Muslim name. The new child of Wills and Kate will be fourth in line to the Throne, pushing Prince Harry down to fifth. That means there is a chance, albeit only a very small one, that this child will one day be either King of Queen and therefore they will also be the Supremer Governor of the Church of England. Therefore this child can be of no other religion other than Church of England.

Muhammad is still a nice name for a girl, and, it will go a long way to reaching out to the Muslim community as a sign of respect

Why's it always Muzzie we have to "reach out to" and "show respect to"? Why not call the new child Aaron or Kaila as a "sign of respect" to Britain's large Jewish community, the fifth-biggest in the world? Why not call it Adheesh or Eesha as a "sign of respect" to Britain's large Hindu population, the largest in Europe and the 23rd-largest in the world? Why not call it Baljinder or Dharampreet as a "sign of respect" to Britain's huge Sikh population, which is the third-biggest in the world?
 

captain morgan

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 28, 2009
28,429
146
63
A Mouse Once Bit My Sister
Muhammad is a Muslim name. The new child of Wills and Kate will be fourth in line to the Throne, pushing Prince Harry down to fifth. That means there is a chance, albeit only a very small one, that this child will one day be either King of Queen and therefore they will also be the Supremer Governor of the Church of England. Therefore this child can be of no other religion other than Church of England.

Mistook Harry for Bill, but it doesn't matter really. The Church of England has changed up before when what-his-face wanted the ability to divorce. Same applies here now that the UK will be predominately Muslim in the near future.

Get with the program and name the urchin Muhammad and bundle the kid up in a burka.

 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
110,325
11,796
113
Low Earth Orbit
If Britain wasn't so deep in the hole, they wouldn't have needed the immigration to repay debt so be gratefulnthat young Moe who will be paying for the elderly whites and their privileges.
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
48,574
1,687
113
same applies here now that the UK will be predominately Muslim in the near future.

If I were you, I'd be more worried about the growth of Canada's Muzzie population.

The stats show that the Muslim population of Britain will double between now and 2030 and it will also double in the US over the same time period, whereas it will TREBLE in Canada between now and 2030. So Canada will probably become an Islamic state long before Britain does.

The UK has an official population of 65 million (although the more sensible amongst us believe it to be more like 75 million). However, there are only thought to be around 2.8 million Muzzies in Britain.

From 1990 to 2010 the number of followers of the Islamic faith around the world increased at an average rate of 2.2 per cent annually. Last year there were 1.57billion around the world.

The British increase in the Muslim population from the current 2.8million will be mainly driven by immigration, according to figures prepared by a Washington think tank.

Projections by the respected Pew Research Centre said the 40 years between 1990 and 2030 will see a fivefold rise in Britain.

In 1990 there were 1.1million Muslims in Britain, representing two per cent of the population.

By last year that figure had risen to 2.8million, or four per cent. By 2030 the number will hit 5.5million - eight per cent of an estimated 68million population, Pew researchers said.

Enlarge


In the U.S., the number of Muslims will also double by 2030 - rising to 6.2million from 2.6million today. But the percentage of Muslims will remain lower than theUK because the total population is five times bigger there, with around 300million at present.

Last May, official figures showed that there could be 70million people in Britain by 2029 - largely fuelled by the migrant boom.

By comparison, in the same year the Arab state of Kuwait is expected to have a Muslim population of 3.6million, it forecast.

The report said one in four migrants to the UK are Muslims.

In Canada, the number of Muslims is set to nearly treble to 2.7million in 2030 from 940,000 at present, the study found.




‘The greatest increases in the Muslim share of the population - driven primarily by continued migration - are likely to occur in Western and Northern Europe, where Muslims will be approaching double-digit percentages of the population in several countries,’ it said.


Read more: Number of British Muslims will double to 5.5m in 20 years | Daily Mail Online
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook



Get with the program and name the urchin Muhammad and bundle the kid up in a burka.
No.
 
Last edited:

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
48,574
1,687
113
If Britain wasn't so deep in the hole,

Our economy is outperforming every other major Western economy.

they wouldn't have needed the immigration

We didn't need the immigration. The left-wingers of the Labour Party, when they were in power between 1997 and 2010, opened the floorgates to Tom, Dick and Abdul for no other reason other than to increase the number of Labour voters in the country (most immigrants vote Labour because that party lavishes them with benefits) and to "rub the Right's nose in diversity." That is the only reason why the last Labour Government allowed more people into the country during their 13 years in power than came here in the previous 1,000 years.

to repay debt so be gratefulnthat young Moe who will be paying for the elderly whites and their privileges.

Privileges which those "elderly whites" have spent 50 years working hard for.

I'll say again: Around half of Muslim men and three-quarters of Muslim women in Britain are unemployed and live off the lavish benefits paid to them by the hardworking British taxpayer.

Have you given any consideration to converting BL?

Why on Earth would I want to become a Muzzie? I don't believe in Allah and many of the things that Islime teaches. I'm Anglican until I die.
 

captain morgan

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 28, 2009
28,429
146
63
A Mouse Once Bit My Sister
Man... you guys are screwed.

Have you given any consideration to converting BL?

No doubt, screwed and they don't even know it.

You'd think that BL would take heed of their issues based solely on the terrorist threat level that his gvt has published... That and guys walking down the street with meat cleavers, butchering soldiers is a dead give away.
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
48,574
1,687
113
You'd think that BL would take heed of their issues based solely on the terrorist threat level that his gvt has published...

Britain's terrorist threat level was as high as it is now, if not higher, virtually throughout the entire 1980s. It's no big deal.


That and guys walking down the street with meat cleavers, butchering soldiers is a dead give away.


It was only just over a month ago that a Muzzie went on a shooting spree inside the Canadian Parliament.
 

captain morgan

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 28, 2009
28,429
146
63
A Mouse Once Bit My Sister
It was only just over a month ago that a Muzzie went on a shooting spree inside the Canadian Parliament.

... And he was shot down like the pig he was... He had a 5 second trial and the judge, jury and executioner did their jobs

We don't fukk around here BL, the Speaker of the House went and got his side arm and got the job done. Unlike the coward that butchered a man with a cleaver, the only fatality here was the terrorist
 

Corduroy

Senate Member
Feb 9, 2011
6,670
2
36
Vancouver, BC
Over the past hundred years, since there have been records kept, baby names have diversified in English families. Traditional names come and go and every few years a new name is more popular. But one point these "most popular name" statistics often miss out is that it's not so much that different names are popular but that more names are popular.The most popular names today aren't as popular as the most popular names 50 years ago were at the time. That's to say, if John was the most popular boy's name in 1950 and Ethan is the most popular now, there were many many more Johns named then than there are Ethans named now.

As is this a trend among English speakers, it has the effect of pushing up the apparent popularity of non-English names used in families that aren't so obsessed with yoonique baby names. It seems like there's a tidal wave of Mohammads, but as Muslim families very frequently name their children Mohammad, and English families are essentially splitting the vote, the racist implications Blackleaf and others are drawing is simply a lie of statistics.
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
48,574
1,687
113
... And he was shot down like the pig he was... He had a 5 second trial and the judge, jury and executioner did their jobs.

We don't fukk around here BL, the Speaker of the House went and got his side arm and got the job done. Unlike the coward that butchered a man with a cleaver, the only fatality here was the terrorist

Come off it. He wasn't executed. He'll be out of a cushy Canadian liberal prison within ten years.
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
48,574
1,687
113
Over the past hundred years, since there have been records kept, baby names have diversified in English families. Traditional names come and go and every few years a new name is more popular. But one point these "most popular name" statistics often miss out is that it's not so much that different names are popular but that more names are popular.The most popular names today aren't as popular as the most popular names 50 years ago were at the time. That's to say, if John was the most popular boy's name in 1950 and Ethan is the most popular now, there were many many more Johns named then than there are Ethans named now.

As is this a trend among English speakers, it has the effect of pushing up the apparent popularity of non-English names used in families that aren't so obsessed with yoonique baby names. It seems like there's a tidal wave of Mohammads, but as Muslim families very frequently name their children Mohammad, and English families are essentially splitting the vote, the racist implications Blackleaf and others are drawing is simply a lie of statistics.

The fact that Mohammed has topped the UK baby name's list is a tragedy. British, Christian culture must be preserved and I hope sanity prevails and Jack or some other great British name returns to the top of the boys' names list next year.