How many straw man arguments can you string together?It's a biased right that can be used for screwball purposes like spite, revenge, monetary gain or worse.
If a woman decides she wants to produce babies for cash adoptions for tremendous financial gain by being an easy hosebag, what percentage would the male who was unknowingly being used as breed stock be entitled to if he found out?
The fact that it's based on the "straw man of the Person" and not the reality of which is a Human Right to Life is very flimsy
It's a very manipulative term.
You stand by the Human Right to Life when it's used to justify military actions and trade blockades, why not fully?
Corporations and Governments are Persons too.
How do you go about getting one them aborted when you can't afford one, aren't ready for one, one will make you fat or you just don't want one?
Your right to walk the street might be used for all those purposes too.