Let's pick on Hillary (Her Thighness)

Cliffy

Standing Member
Nov 19, 2008
44,850
193
63
Nakusp, BC
A bombshell study released by Stanford University confirms evidence of election fraud during the 2016 Democratic Party primaries.

According to a paper released this week entitled, “Are we witnessing a dishonest election?,” a state comparison based on the voting procedures used during the election reveals endemic election fraud within the system.


Stanford University Confirms Democratic Election Fraud

As if we didn't know. Almost every election in the US for decades has been fraudulent but this one is so blatant, it makes one wonder why there is no rioting in the streets.
 

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,198
113
There have been enough actual vote fraud convictions of one type or another to negate at least the last 4 US federal elections
 

Locutus

Adorable Deplorable
Jun 18, 2007
32,230
47
48
66
She can’t help herself. Even yesterday, with the political world fixated on her meeting with FBI agents, Hillary Clinton had her flack mislead the public.

A spokesman said she gave a “voluntary” interview, which is true only because she agreed to talk instead of waiting to be subpoenaed. The flack also said she was “pleased” to assist the gumshoes.

Who believes she was “pleased” to be interviewed by the FBI in a criminal investigation that could upend her life?
But that’s the way the Clintons roll.

Wherever they go, whatever they do, ethics are trashed and suspicions of criminal conduct follow them like night follows day.

It’s who they are and it’s self-delusional to believe another stint in the White House would make the Clintons better people.

Power exacerbates rather than cures an absence of integrity.

Yet there’s another dimension to their chronic crookedness, and it gets insufficient attention even though it might be more important to the nation’s well-being.

It is that, in addition to being personally corrupt, the Clintons are corrupters. They are piggish users, with the people and institutions around them inevitably tarnished and sometimes destroyed even as the Clintons escape to their next scam.

Monica Lewinsky is a prime example, and Loretta Lynch is the latest. The attorney general’s dumbfounding decision to meet privately with Bill Clinton while the FBI investigates Hillary’s handling of national secrets stained Lynch’s reputation and added to public mistrust of the Justice Department.

Lynch didn’t create that mistrust — she was supposed to be the antidote. Her predecessor, Eric Holder, was a left-wing activist who used his role as the nation’s chief law-enforcement officer to further his and Obama’s political agenda.

That role earned Holder an undesired distinction. His refusal to cooperate with Congress on the disastrous Fast and Furious gun sting led to a bipartisan vote in the House holding him in criminal contempt, the first time in history a sitting Cabinet member ever faced such a censure.

Lynch, as his successor, was handily confirmed by the Republican-controlled Senate, with her steady, firm demeanor and solid record as a prosecutor carrying the day.

Yet her lifetime of good work and the hope for a fresh start at Justice are now overshadowed. She acknowledges the meeting with Bill Clinton was a mistake, and pledged to accept the recommendation of FBI agents and career prosecutors on whether Hillary should face charges.

That’s not enough, not nearly enough, given the circumstances and stakes.

While Lynch offers no explanation as to why in the world she agreed to the 30-minute meeting on a plane in Phoenix, perhaps she felt she owed the former president something. Remember, he first nominated her to be the US attorney in Brooklyn in 1999, a promotion that changed her life.

After his presidency, she went to a top private law firm, and became a member of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Bill Clinton had been very, very good to her, and without his boost, she probably wouldn’t even have been a candidate to replace Holder.

And now her patron wanted a private meeting. Both had to know it was wrong, but he had nothing to lose and didn’t care about her reputation or the Justice Department’s.

That was her responsibility. And it doesn’t really matter if they didn’t discuss the case. Just his being there was reminder enough that she owes him.

Lynch also had to know that an FBI agent who socialized with the spouse of a suspect in a criminal case probably would be investigated and fired. Yet she agreed to the meeting anyway.

Despite Lynch’s vow to let others make the call, her refusal to recuse herself means she will remain in charge. That was never ideal because Obama endorsed Hillary and all but exonerated her, but there seemed no way to argue for a special prosecutor without more evidence that the outcome was rigged. There was also FBI Director James Comey’s reputation as an independent straight shooter to provide some reassurance that the case would be handled on the merits.

Now Lynch has broken that fragile confidence, and the need for a special prosecutor is obvious.

The explosive result shows the Clintons haven’t lost their touch for leaving destruction and chaos in their wake. The remarkable events also serve as a clear reminder that while the Clintons enriched themselves over the years, they were helping to bankrupt the public trust in its government and institutions. And they won’t stop until they’re stopped.


From Monica To Loretta - The Clintons Corrupt Absolutely | Zero Hedge

america will really get what it deserves now given that the press is willing to let this slide. I'm stunned by their decision that this is ok.
 

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
38,848
3,569
113
'We have one shot, one moment'; Activists plan to eat beans and hold ‘fart-in’ at Democratic Convention
Postmedia Network
First posted: Wednesday, July 13, 2016 06:44 PM EDT | Updated: Wednesday, July 13, 2016 07:06 PM EDT
Politics stinks, but not usually like this. Anti-poverty activists are planning a "fart-in" at the Democratic National Convention in Philadelphia to protest Hillary Clinton's nomination.
Members of the Poor People's Economic Human Rights Campaign will be collecting cans of beans to distribute the needy. They also plan to eat plenty of beans themselves before heading into the Wells Fargo Center to gas up the convention.
"We're going to surround the Democratic National Convention and have a national fart-in, as a final expression of what we think of this whole process," group leader Cheri Honkala told Newsworks, a daily public radio program based in Philadelphia.
"The government is great at making us disappear. We have one shot, one moment, to figure out a way to have the rest of the world understand. That's how we intend to protect people here."
'We have one shot, one moment'; Activists plan to eat beans and hold ‘fart-in’ a
 

Mowich

Hall of Fame Member
Dec 25, 2005
16,649
998
113
76
Eagle Creek


'A real gas’: Activists plan to eat beans and hold ‘fart-in’ for Clinton’s speech at Democratic Convention

A group of political activists are planning to raise a stink about Hillary Clinton’s Democratic nomination — by eating can after can of beans.

The Poor People’s Economic Human Rights Campaign, an anti-poverty group, will be holding a bean supper on July 28 — the third day of the Democratic National Convention in Philadelphia — for what it says are hundreds of expected participants, including Bernie Sanders delegates. Stuffed with beans, the delegates will head to the convention at the Wells Fargo Center and when Clinton takes the stage for a speech, they’ll let her know exactly what they think of her by passing gas.

“Because we think (Clinton) stinks, we’re going to hold a fart-in,” Cheri Honkala, the event’s organizer, said. “We’re expecting this thing to be a real gas.”

While the Sanders delegates are participating in the fart-in from inside the Wells Fargo Center, the remaining members will participating from across the street.

Sanders officially endorsed Clinton for the Democratic nomination Tuesday, but Honkala said that won’t stop the bipartisan group from staging the fart-in. Honkala, who has been accepting donations of cans of beans, said it’ll probably boost their cause instead.

“After (Sanders’) announcement to endorse (Clinton), I think the cans of beans are going to quadruple,” Honkala said.

More than 100 cans of beans — and even a US$500 cheque to buy more cans — have poured in from across the country, Honkala said. Confirmed participants are coming from as far as Florida.

Sanders himself even received an invite.


More: ‘A real gas’: Activists plan to eat beans and hold ‘fart-in’ for Clinton’s speech at Democratic Convention | National Post

 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
I do say.... this Sander's crowd does give the Democrat Establishment fits. They simply won't get in line!