Maybe so ... but either way he wouldn't be homelessIf Mcmillan had been limited to Canadian health care, he would have had to surrender his house.
To his heirs.
Maybe so ... but either way he wouldn't be homelessIf Mcmillan had been limited to Canadian health care, he would have had to surrender his house.
To his heirs.
Well done, you. You've put up a spirited defence of Canada's "let them die" health care system. You will perhaps forgive us if we decline to adopt it.Maybe so ... but either way he wouldn't be homeless
Well done, you. You've put up a spirited defence of Canada's "let them die" health care system. You will perhaps forgive us if we decline to adopt it.
Maybe we should adopt Germany's. . . nah, we'd just have Canadians flooding over the border trying to live.
...the difference being nobody in the Health Care industry profits off someone else's misery ... as in the Untied State of Arrogance
No, I put that down to the well-known phenomenon that "only the good die young."That would explain why we live longer on average than you guys do.
That's right. This is the kind of "fact" that makes the health-care debate so much fun!That makes no sense whatsoever. You think everyone in health care works for free, and all the medical supply companies are non profits?
...amd you have given an excellent example of "look over there" in defense of letting the less fortunate sufferWell done, you. You've put up a spirited defence of Canada's "let them die" health care system. You will perhaps forgive us if we decline to adopt it.
Maybe we should adopt Germany's. . . nah, we'd just have Canadians flooding over the border trying to live.
Difference is I want to implement an effective health-care system. You just want to sneer at Americans and turn your eyes away from the problems in yours....amd you have given an excellent example of "look over there" in defense of letting the less fortunate suffer
Of course they do. And in Canada, they set up a gigantic, incredibly expensive bureaucracy to keep people from dying of cancer, and people die of cancer.
Post #55, where you not only turn your eyes away, but in your haste to bash Americans you actually make the preposterous claim that in Canada nobody profits from other folks' suffering."...and all men are created equal..."
Put up the link where I actually turn my eyes away from the problems, troll
That makes no sense whatsoever. You think everyone in health care works for free, and all the medical supply companies are non profits?
If the profits are so great, why are they subsidized? The point is, nobody needs cash up front or private health insurance. Don't tell me what I think.
Feel free to interpret as you wish. Then you can be as wrong as you want. Has anyone ever done a credit check on you before you are admitted ... or visit the doctor? Have you ever had to mortgage the house come birthing time?
Sure, there are limits on what public health care will do - and they who can afford it can go where the care is more to their liking. We all know you know there are less fortunte people in this country - just the same as the rest of the world. We've all heard the griping about "my tax dollars"
Post #55, where you not only turn your eyes away, but in your haste to bash Americans you actually make the preposterous claim that in Canada nobody profits from other folks' suffering.
Of course they do. And in Canada, they set up a gigantic, incredibly expensive bureaucracy to keep people from dying of cancer, and people die of cancer.
Difference is I want to implement an effective health-care system. You just want to sneer at Americans and turn your eyes away from the problems in yours.
...a response to trollish sarcasm on post before. Your shit is scent-free Bones?
BTW.... Cancer research isn't a Canada-only phenomenon - and people still die of cancer
Still trolling? May I have an opinion without clearing it through you first?Still standing on your "nobody profits from peoples' suffering" claim?