It's Time to Upgrade Free Speech to Fair Speech

spilledthebeer

Executive Branch Member
Jan 26, 2017
9,296
4
36
No one reads long posts.


HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! OF COURSE PEOPLE READ LONG POSTS! LIE-berals read long posts looking frantically for any mistake or slip up- no matter how small- in a frantic and fruitless effort to their FAILED policies!

And other people read long posts put up by LIE-berals- looking for the weasel words buried in the post that will trip them up if they do not fully study LIE-beral policy
 

Walter

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 28, 2007
34,887
126
63
HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! OF COURSE PEOPLE READ LONG POSTS! LIE-berals read long posts looking frantically for any mistake or slip up- no matter how small- in a frantic and fruitless effort to their FAILED policies!

And other people read long posts put up by LIE-berals- looking for the weasel words buried in the post that will trip them up if they do not fully study LIE-beral policy
That’s better.
 

spilledthebeer

Executive Branch Member
Jan 26, 2017
9,296
4
36
That’s better.

Here is an old post to remind us of the LIE-beral weasel words that LIE-berals are trying to use to rig our elections in their favour:

We’ve been hearing an awful lot lately about the federal government’s proposed Fair Elections Act.
Mostly, we’ve been hearing complaints, and mostly, the complaints have been about the Conservatives’ intention to ban the practice of vouching for voters lacking proper identification on election day.
Vouching means that if you can’t prove where you live, you can have someone else swear an oath that you’re the person on the voter list.
About 120,000 Canadians use it, mostly elderly or aboriginal. Several provinces, including Ontario, have banned the practice in provincial elections.
I’ve yet to meet any ordinary citizen whose eyes don’t glaze over when you mention vouching, but opposition politicians, Elections Canada and the media all care a great deal about it and so week after week, the complaints flow.
But considering the uproar, I haven’t heard of anyone interviewing people who actually do the work on Election Day — the army of temporary Elections Canada employees who hand you your ballot.
I was one of them during the last federal election and let me be the first to tell you vouching stinks. It’s an open invitation to voter fraud. The sooner they ditch it, the better.
Case in point: Charlie. He limped in to the small-town, three-poll church hall, leaning heavily on the arm of a taxi driver who steered him over to me, the deputy returning officer for his poll. Charlie was 95 and had no identification. He didn’t know he needed it and didn’t have any.
I said I needed ID. People started getting mad.
“This is Charlie,” someone said. “Everybody knows Charlie. He’s been voting here for 70 years.” “Fine,” I said, “But I don’t know who he is and I’m the one who needs to know.” By that time, everyone in the place was shouting. So I asked for someone to vouch for him.
Suddenly, things got very quiet. Seconds dragged by; the lineup behind Charlie got longer and longer. Finally, the taxi driver said he’d vouch for him.
Now here’s the thing about Elections Canada’s temp staff: The DROs are chosen from a list provided by the party who won the election the last time. The poll clerks who assist them come from the party that finished second.
My poll clerk was a Liberal. Maybe she was deliberately causing trouble or maybe she was genuinely confused but in the end, no paperwork was done.
Charlie voted, but there’s no record of what transpired.
Had the election been in dispute, or had Elections Canada chosen to check my riding for potential fraud, there was no trail to follow.
To this day, I don’t know for a fact if Charlie was really Charlie.
The same scene played out several times that day, one involving a woman who appeared to be out of it and whose son may have voted for her. Again, no paperwork.
This could be one reason Elections Canada says there’s no evidence of widespread voter fraud. It may in fact happen, but there’s no evidence there was a problem in the first place.
A handful of votes in my poll, multiplied by several hundred polls in my riding, becomes a lot of votes.
In big cities? In those condo canyons where no one knows anyone? Voter fraud could happen quite easily.
There are other voting day problems the Fair Elections Act could correct but vouching is the big one.
Get rid of it and let voters use their voter identification cards instead.
 

Hoid

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 15, 2017
20,408
4
36
That means twit listers should be able to say their special things about everything and be treated like adults, instead of like idiots. Thats fair speech. Stupid people are not excluded. Its very timely.
 

Walter

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 28, 2007
34,887
126
63
That means twit listers should be able to say their special things about everything and be treated like adults, instead of like idiots. Thats fair speech. Stupid people are not excluded. Its very timely.
If people say stupid things they should be ridiculed, that's free speech.
 

Hoid

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 15, 2017
20,408
4
36
Where have I advocated for anything at all?

Is that just another one of those words you use without knowing what they mean?
 

Walter

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 28, 2007
34,887
126
63
That means twit listers should be able to say their special things about everything and be treated like adults, instead of like idiots. Thats fair speech. Stupid people are not excluded. Its very timely.
This is what is called advocating.
 

Murphy

Executive Branch Member
Apr 12, 2013
8,181
0
36
Ontario
You have a nasty mouth for a 14 year old. You need to be put to work at a farm. Some honest, manual labour will help discipline your mind. :)
 

spilledthebeer

Executive Branch Member
Jan 26, 2017
9,296
4
36
You know sarcasm as well as Sheldon Cooper does.
Here is an article illustrating that newly minted NDP leader Jagmeet Singh is political dead meat even before an election! It`s what happens when you follow LIE-beral values! As for |Our idiot Boy Justin- the latest polls show he would \L|OSE an election held today! And that is BEFORE we start counting the cost of his stupid trade war with Trump! Our idiot Boy could have avoided the fiscal hit simply by recognizing that a lot of people on both sides of thd birder are nervous about Muslim terror- with good reason! The article has some comments of my own in brackets):

Jagmeet Singh, the Trudeau Liberals’ new best friend

From Mark Bonokoski. Published: January 5, 2018. Updated: January 6, 2018 6:19 PM EST

Filed Under: Toronto SUN/ Opinion/ Columnists

Related

Editorials
EDITORIAL: Toronto can't solve homeless crisis on its own
Columnists
WALLACE: Business and insurance companies Wynne big with free drugs
Columnists
GOLDSTEIN: Trudeau doesn’t understand nature of evil

Even as the last gasps of the year wheezed from the lungs of 2017, NDP leader Jagmeet Singh was already a spent political force.

Actually, “force” is too strong a word. He’s more of a spent thought.

With four recent byelections seeing federal NDP support sink even lower than the wading-pool depths of 2015, it is becoming more apparent that average Canadians are not quite ready yet to embrace the new NDP leader, even one as photogenic, flashy and fluently bilingual in both official languages as the non-MP from Toronto.

Yes, there’s that, too. Singh doesn’t have a seat in the House of Commons and seems to see no reason yet to seek one.

And, then there is that not-so-forgotten clip following his leadership victory when Jagmeet Singh would not categorically denounce the Sikh extremism still lying within Canada that bombed Air India Flight 182 out of the sky in 1985.

(Jagmeet is a typical loonie leftie politician- trying to hunt with the hounds and run with the hare- so to speak. His evasive duplicity on the subject of Sikh extremists will NOT serve him well on a world stage - as Our idiot Boy Justin has discovered during his disastrous India trip! Indian govt is at daggers drawn with Sikhs and Jagmeet will simply fan the flames higher with his dangerous and entirely hypocrite values!)

Such non-committal over something so cowardly and criminal tends to make ordinary folks more than just a little wary, and possibly even a little suspect of one’s primary allegiances.

When the CBC’s Terry Milewski asked Singh if he would condemn the current glorification of the bombers within certain segments of the Sikh community — with heroic adulation being expressed in posters — Singh condemned the question but avoided the answer.

As he described it later, “I think it was definitely some sort of clear problematic line of thought behind that question,” he said. “It was offensive to me that that was even a question.”

(Oh sure- nuclear armed India is in a military standoff with nuclear armed Pakistan and also with Sikh terrorists adding to the tension- and Sikh Jagmeet Singh- with his not so subtle support of Sikh extremists along with his desire to be our prime minister cannot see why we ought to be uneasy with his values? How big a hypocrite is he really?)

Those who rallied to Singh’s defence claimed two things. One, that Air India was old news. And that, two, the same question would not have been asked of Justin Trudeau or Tom Mulcair.

Really?

If Trudeau or Mulcair were Sikhs, the same question would have definitely been asked of them as it was of Singh.

Air India, its main perpetrators never charged, is not something that has an expiry date simply because 32 years have passed.

(This IS standard leftist habit- hoping we have short memories and will forget much that ought to be remembered- and held against them! Recently Jagmeet told us he was in favour of “tax fairness” and wanted to spend big on infrastructure- without going to the trouble of telling us WHERE the money would come from? Should we assume that Jagmeet plans to introduce a national version of the notorious RAE DAYS that so devastated Ontari-owe? And does Jagmeet not understand that his opponent- the idiot Boy Justin has ALREADY claimed that insane tax and spend and borrow till they ban you position? Muddle headed Jag is offering us a choice between mad LIE-beral spending and really mad NDP spending! Civil service Hogs who think the entire world belongs to them WILL be pleased! Too bad it looks as if ordinary Cdns are about to come out en masse to demonstrate their rage with vote buying LIE-berals- and NDPers may get caught up too! )

Some 329 people, including 268 Canadian citizens, were killed in that bombing, so the question asked by Milewski was legit.

Let’s not forget, too, that Conservative leader Andrew Scheer was critically questioned about the depth of his Roman Catholicism, and how it would affect his policy decisions.

Jagmeet Singh’s quick descent from the new-age heir to Jack Layton’s mantle to a spent political thought could not be worse news for the Conservatives, or better news for the Trudeau Liberals.

The prime minister spent the last days of 2017 flapping around like a flounder, meeting with alleged terror captive Joshua Boyle, offering in one year-end interview that ISIS returnees will somehow contribute to Canadianism, and then embarrassingly fumbling over an answer to questions about his historic guilt regarding ethics breaches.

(Given known Turdope family hostility to what papa Pierre called “Cdn imperialism” it is a safe bet that Our idiot Boy really believes returning Isis fighters will help......HIM!)

If the Liberals were worried the NDP would be eating into their leftist ethos, thereby splitting the progressive vote in 2019, then their worries are over.

It’s Jagmeet Singh to their rescue.

If there is a time for Singh to shine, it’s when the Commons returns at January’s end. The Liberals are bogged down in mud, and the prime minister’s ethics convictions will be atop the oppositions’ playlist.

(Face it- Jagmeet is not just yesterdays man- even before he became NDP leader- he is also the man who never was and never will be KING!)

Yet there will be no Jagmeet Singh in Question Period to display what the NDP faithful and lefty swing voters hope will be a well-tuned, quick-of-wit politician brimming with charisma and confidence.

(Singh appears to be playing a careful game here- He apparently holds views that make LIE-berals look halfway sane- with Singh not wanting the general public to get a close look at him- and hoping that the Cdn “Middle Class” that has NOT gotten the shower of gravy promised by LIE-berals may turn to him in frustration! In short we can probably count on NDPers NOT to tell us their full party platform- they hunt with the hounds and run with the hare! And NDPers wonder why we don’t trust them to lead us! HAHAHAHA!!!! We expect politicians to exaggerate- we do NOT expect them to spend the entire day spinning political policy yarns! )

Singh may think he is ready, but he’s not showing it.

If he were, he would have been champing at the bit to run in the first byelection that came up, not lying in the weeds.

The Commons’ next session is going to be a hot one.

But Singh won’t be sitting in.

markbonokoski at gmail