It's REALLY Evident on here.
- Thread starter Tygerbright
- Start date
So...you're going to whinge and tantrum or tell us how to make our system better without making folks pay?
You arent proud. You are externalizing your unease on to us as a bullshit method of propping up your faltering ego.
There is a word for raging and battling against nonexistent enemies in your head - schizophrenia.
:lol: :lol: :lol: The polarity switch? Oh do tell when that happened? Was it when Johnson signed the Civil Rights Act into law and stated, "That'll keep the ni**ers voting for us for another 50 years."? Was it when Joe Biden came up with the idea of a Drug Czar, re-classified crack separately from powder and pushed for the penalty for possession to be much harsher? And of course guess which community was the predominant crack user.
Or how about when Joe Biden was instrumental in helping create the for-profit prison system (his idea even) which saw a F*CK-ton of innocent Black people railroaded into the system. Even more so than under the previous system
Or how about the Democrats showing up to a memorial wearing kente cloth. Yeah yeah, you're gonna tell me that it has more historical significance than just African slavers helping out the Europeans in getting slaves in exchange for firearms. But again, it's no surprise the racist Democrats would don that garb instead of other African garb that has NO connection to African slavers. They just can't hide their racist roots no matter how many times they try to dye them.
Nice try toots but the leftist moral relativism and history revision doesn't work on me. Some of us figured out that education is a lifetime commitment, not just somebody else's job to do for you for 13-20 years of your life.
Well that was certainly Trumplike in it's all over the placeness and non connectivity.
Current politics Republicans are the lead party of racism, sexism as well as bigotry.
Don't cry to me because your comprehension levels suck. So, you're problem was with my syntax and not the racist policies of the Democrats. Man, the left-wing extremists are going to eat you alive.
You babbled, you literally babbled and I laughed.
I'll take all the chances I want with the left-wing "extremists" given most are just centerists.
Babbled huh? What's the matter toots, did I use too many multi-syllable words for your tiny mind to comprehend?
:lol: :lol: :lol: No such thing as a "centerist".
You are totally clueless. Most of us are centralist. The garbage you call centralist are left wing extremists. AKA FASCIST.
Oh that's a load of crap. Most of you are Centralist? More like right of centre at least.
For "centralist" or suggesting that the left-wing can be fascist? In the case of the latter, there is such a thing. Anti-Stalinist Russians called Stalin a red fascist because in reality, that's exactly what he was. Khrushchev, same thing. Mao, same thing. Jinping, same thing. Communism/socialism is mere window dressing in an attempt to bullshit the masses.
Being a moderate and remaining unrelentingly silent while extremists from "your" side do their shit is the exact same thing as BLM's claim that "White silence is violence".
How many "moderates" in nazi Germany simply accepted what was going on? The difference is, if you got a little too outspoken about Hitler and/or his policies, you and your family were are serious risk. What's the excuse of the so-called left-wing moderates today? Are they that fearful of retribution? Have they helped create a monster they can't control?
Facism is a right of center authoritarian regime. Different than a left of center authoritarian regime. I'm not going to argue with anyone about it. Believe what you want.
Left-wing fascism and left fascism are sociological and philosophical terms used to categorize tendencies in left-wing politics otherwise commonly attributed to the ideology of fascism.
No belief, fact. Are you going to seriously suggest that Stalin wasn't really a fascist?
Many leftists in the 1930s and 1940s became disillusioned by and estranged from the Soviet Union, condemning it for its rigid authoritarianism. Otto Rühle, a German left communist, wrote that "the struggle against fascism must begin with the struggle against bolshevism", noting the possible influence the Leninist state had on fascist states by serving as a model. In 1939, Rühle further professed:
Russia was the example for fascism. [...] Whether party 'communists' like it or not, the fact remains that the state order and rule in Russia are indistinguishable from those in Italy and Germany. Essentially they are alike. One may speak of a red, black, or brown 'soviet state', as well as of red, black or brown fascism.[
I gotta go with Jin on this one. The best definition of "fascism" I've seen is "A governmental philosophy of unitary control by an executive of all governmental, judicial, and economic factors of the country, with little or no regard to legal standards or legislative authority." That's independent of "left" and "right," whatever those terms even mean these days.
Two very prominent forms of fascism are totalitarianism, as practiced by Germany during the Nazi period and most communist countries during the Cold War period, and thugocracy, as practiced by Russia under Putin and, increasingly, the United States under Trump, wherein advancement in the thugocracy depends on:
1. Identifying some action of which you think the bosses will approve.
2. Expending your own resources to accomplish that action.
3. Hoping and working to bring it to the attention of the bosses.
If they approve, you move up, sometimes drastically, with attendant rewards of money and power. If they disapprove, you can end up dead or in prison. If they're indifferent, you do not get the expended resources back.
Two very prominent forms of fascism are totalitarianism, as practiced by Germany during the Nazi period and most communist countries during the Cold War period, and thugocracy, as practiced by Russia under Putin and, increasingly, the United States under Trump, wherein advancement in the thugocracy depends on:
1. Identifying some action of which you think the bosses will approve.
2. Expending your own resources to accomplish that action.
3. Hoping and working to bring it to the attention of the bosses.
If they approve, you move up, sometimes drastically, with attendant rewards of money and power. If they disapprove, you can end up dead or in prison. If they're indifferent, you do not get the expended resources back.