I don't think Amanda will ever serve any more time for this murder but I do think she was involved. The Italian
justice system, to an outside observer, might leave something to be desired, but it is one of the parents of the
American system. I'd still like to see more of the evidence.
-------------------------------------
Hi Juan,
I hope Amanda and Raphael wont serve anymore time, and hope this latest twist, will end in finding them both innocent.
If they are found guilty, it is hard to say what will happen in terms of the Extradition, as the legal question of whether or not they were acquitted, or if their original trial was thrown out, needs to be determined.
If it is determined that that tey were actually acquitted, then the double jeopardy claus would rule in favor of Amanda. If it is legally determined that the trial was thrown out, then double jeopardy would not spare her from extradition.
This question would likely take years of legal battling to conclude and sadly could leave Amanda's life hanging in the balace for still more years to come. As for Raphael, he is in Switzerland where their extradition laws are similarily unclear for him.
There has never been a US case like this so it is all new ad speculative and uncertain. How sad!
Jaun, you say that you believe she was involved and you say you would like more evidence...
I am curious about what gave you the idea (what evidence) that she was ever involved in this heinous sad crime?
Analysis: Knox case could pit extradition treaty against U.S. Constitution | Reuters
They'll try her in absentia, I'm sure. I really didn't follow that whole trial, I have no idea if she's guilty or not guilty, but I have come to the conclusion, pretty much just from this article alone, that the Italian legal system seems to be quite the farce.
Actually I do recall hearing some reports of her behaving "weird" when they were initially questioning her which is I'm sure what made them suspicious of her in the first place. But I will also never forget how many times I heard that same thing about Guy Paul Morin as well, and eventually he was proven innocent.
-------------------------------------------------
Hi SLM,
I too agree that LE became convinced only by behavior which as you pointed out, is very unreliable.
I suspect most people would agree that it would be inappropriate to kiss your boyfriend outside the crimescne where a roomate was murdered.
The problem is that "odd behavior" is considered enough in too many cases, to get convictions where it is unreliable at best.
I believe that physical evidence is getting further and further removed as a requirement in too many cases. "odd behavior" and gut feelings are coming in to more courtrooms every year, and so are more wrongful convictions. The sad truth is that the average time a wrongfully convicted person spends behind bars is 16 years.
The sad truth is that many have been executed or die in jail, where there was never any physical evidence against them to begin with. which is just like this case. The idea that neither Amanda or Raphael, left one stitch of dna or prints where Meredith was killed, is unbelieveable given the space in Meredith's tiny room. I doubt Amanada and Raphael could get away with not leaving their dna behind, and taking Merediths with them is too hard to believe.
Rudy Guede the thug who left his DNA and prints behind, as well as having Merediths defensive wounds all over him, carries the logical explaination that he acted alone. His dna and prints told the story and his prior charges of breaking in through windows, stealing and having a knife in his possession, explains in my opinion that he acted alone. Sadly the prosecutions crazy theory (of Amanda and Raphael's involvement) helped Rudy the thug, appeal and have his sentence cut in half because of the craziness Mignini spews.