Has he got an agenda ? Is he a registered Democrat ? Does a Yale degree automatically convey credibility honesty and trust ? Do you feel the same about all Ivy League schools ?
Is Trump FIT (Mentally, emotionally, ethically ) FIT for the JOB???
- Thread starter Ocean Breeze
- Start date
why not ask him about any "agenda.?? Or does everyone have some underhanded agenda ?? suspicious/ ulterior motives??.....in your mind..
Medical staff .....when dealing with clinical cases of any type ...... do NOT involve politics. Unethical and biased. Would you give a damn what political affiliating your orthopedic Dr....... has if you have a broken leg?? It is just as applicable to the field of psychiatry. if not more so.
But totally unethical to diagnose someone from a distance. He should lose his license.
WRONG...... and just plain silly.
No one is claiming to formally DIAGNOSE anyone. If the average person had more psychology schooling in their background......they too would be able to assess dysfunctional behavior ......and encourage seeking help. Maybe they would then be able to recognize the signs of mental disorder.......and get hep before someone goes on a shooting escapade. (for an obvious example)
the problem is that far too many still want to live in the dark ages and shun the idea of mental unhealth. The whole idea of psychology ...... and understanding human nature ....is too scary for to many..... they would rather just stay ignorant.
Strange how these same folks have no problem JUDGING others ......
BTW......one CAN diagnose from a distance. Physicians do it all the time. Via video consultations etc..
Last edited:
The Goldwater rule is the informal name given to section 7 in the American Psychiatric Association's (APA) Principles of Medical Ethics,[1] which states that it is unethical for psychiatrists to give a professional opinion about public figures whom they have not examined in person, and from whom they have not obtained consent to discuss their mental health in public statements.[2] It is named after former US Senator and 1964 presidential candidate Barry Goldwater.[3][4]
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goldwater_rule
Right, as usual.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goldwater_rule
Right, as usual.
The Walter Rule is the informal name given to the syndrome which causes a person to adore a man who raw-dogs porn stars while his wife is recovering from giving birth to his son, and still claim to be a Christian.
wonder if he would adore this bloke if he were poor (with the same behavior) or even "average" income level.(with the same behavior and attitudes. )
being awe struck with the one percent and power is a character flaw with inherent biases.
wait for it...............(a reddie to appear )
Probably wouldn't adore him, but Walter'd approve of him for his hatred, racism, misogyny, homophobia, jingoism, and xenophobia all the same. And why not? They'd agree on every issue.
interesting. So it is the character traits they share as opposed to wealth and power. (the wealth and power are an added bonus ) Makes sense.
Wow just asked , I believe the president Of the United States also graduated from a so called Ivy League Institution . Just saying ?
But you would accept his undiagnosed opinion because he is from Yale . Would you accept the same judgement from a third year psychology student at Boise State ?
That went totally over my head . Is it worth my time to research this? Thanks in advance .
Typical prog response, if you don’t like the message attack the messenger. Ad hominem is a poor argument.
Wow. You've raged for 2.5 years straight because a canidate in a foreign country lost an election and then you fell for a massive conspiracy theory claiming that another foreign Govt interfered.
What do you believe amateurs, novices and professions think of that kind of behaviour?