Is Jesus A Prophet According To The Old Testament?

Spade

Ace Poster
Nov 18, 2008
12,822
49
48
11
Aether Island
Like if it is important to know much about science!

From an essay by Bertrand Russell
Quote:
If everything must have a cause, then God must have a cause. If there can be anything without a cause, it may just as well be the world as God, so that there cannot be any validity in that argument. It is exactly of the same nature as the Hindu's view, that the world rested upon an elephant and the elephant rested upon a tortoise; and when they said, "How about the tortoise?" the Indian said, "Suppose we change the subject."
 

SirJosephPorter

Time Out
Nov 7, 2008
11,956
56
48
Ontario
Religious faith has no place only in lunatic asylums but scientific arenas may well be a type of lunatic asylums.

If that is the kind of logic you want to employ, go for it. But the fact remains that religious faith, superstition has no place in science.
 

SirJosephPorter

Time Out
Nov 7, 2008
11,956
56
48
Ontario
Dear Cliff,
Can the swine flu be cast into pigs?
Cousin Spade

Spade; are you familiar with what they did in Cairo? They were convinced that Swine flu comes from swines, so they killed off all the pigs in Cairo. But pigs were very effective, very efficient garbage disposals, they used to eat the organic waste, and people (mostly Christians) then would eat the pigs.

But the government killed all the pigs, and now garbage is piling up in Cairo, there is a big stink in Cairo these days. We are going to visit Egypt and Jordan in January and I am not looking forward to it (luckily, we stay in Cairo for only two days).
 

SirJosephPorter

Time Out
Nov 7, 2008
11,956
56
48
Ontario
Like if it is important to know much about science!

You are right, big, it is not important to know anything about science. Average person gets along just fine without knowing anything about science.

And if you want to go through life without any curiosity as to how the universe works, what formed the stars, planets, etc., that is your right. The problem comes when people who know next to nothing about science try to dictate to scientists as to what scientists should and should not believe. Like Creationists trying to force Creationism down the throat of scientists.
 

ironsides

Executive Branch Member
Feb 13, 2009
8,583
60
48
United States
A constant force, acting on a particle of mass m, will produce a constant acceleration a. Let us choose the x-axis to be in the common direction of F and a. What is the work done by this force on the particle in causing a displacement x? We have, for constant acceleration, the relations a = ( V - v ) / t and x = ½ ( V + v ) t. Here v is the particle's speed at t = 0 and V is its speed at time t. The the work done is W = F x = m a x = m ( ( V - v ) / t ) ( ½ ( V + v ) ) t = ½ m V² - ½ m v². We call one-half the product of the mass of a body and the square of its speed the kinetic energy of the body. If we represent kinetic energy by the symbol K, then K = ½ m v². We may then state the above equation in this way: The work done by the resultant force acting on a particle is equal to the change in the kinetic energy of the particle, and thus the universe came into being.
 

AnnaG

Hall of Fame Member
Jul 5, 2009
17,507
117
63
A constant force, acting on a particle of mass m, will produce a constant acceleration a. Let us choose the x-axis to be in the common direction of F and a. What is the work done by this force on the particle in causing a displacement x? We have, for constant acceleration, the relations a = ( V - v ) / t and x = ½ ( V + v ) t. Here v is the particle's speed at t = 0 and V is its speed at time t. The the work done is W = F x = m a x = m ( ( V - v ) / t ) ( ½ ( V + v ) ) t = ½ m V² - ½ m v². We call one-half the product of the mass of a body and the square of its speed the kinetic energy of the body. If we represent kinetic energy by the symbol K, then K = ½ m v². We may then state the above equation in this way: The work done by the resultant force acting on a particle is equal to the change in the kinetic energy of the particle, and thus the universe came into being.
Nah, whatchamacallit said, "abrakazam" and POOF! There it was, the universe.
 

AnnaG

Hall of Fame Member
Jul 5, 2009
17,507
117
63
If that's true then science should have nothing to do with this thread.
 

Dexter Sinister

Unspecified Specialist
Oct 1, 2004
10,168
539
113
Regina, SK
Like if it is important to know much about science!
That attitude sure explains a lot about you. :roll: Science is the only reliable way we've ever found for testing the truth content of empirical claims. You can't call yourself educated if you're ignorant of its methods and findings.