Iraq (US Crime)Updates &Breaking news

Ocean Breeze

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 5, 2005
18,399
95
48
Re: RE: Iraq (US Crime)Updates &Breaking news

jimmoyer said:
Tuesday, December 6, 2005 Posted at 12:17 PM EST

Associated Press

Baghdad — Two women strapped with explosives blew themselves up at Baghdad's police academy on Tuesday, killing 27 people and wounding 32, the U.S. military said, while Al-Jazeera broadcast a video, purportedly from insurgents, of a kidnapped U.S. security consultant.

The women blew themselves up in a classroom filled with students, the statement from Task Force Baghdad said. No U.S. forces were killed or wounded in the attack, it said.

would this be happening if the USR had not invaded , destroyed and destabilized the country to the point of what it is now.

Maybe the anger that is being expressed at the invasion is one of long standing rage at the US too. Iraq has suffered for a long time and this is just the straw that has broken the camels back.

Would the kidnapped US citizen have been kidnapped and killed if it were not for the insanity of bush's obsession.
 

jimmoyer

jimmoyer
Apr 3, 2005
5,101
22
38
69
Winchester Virginia
www.contactcorp.net
Personal responsibility for your actions should always trump your need to kill your own kind in order to defy your enemy.

Somehow a western liberal will find a rationale, but the Iraqis who knew those killed people certainly don't give the insurgents such a high honor.

Such an attack has really diluted the purpose of the insurgents.
 

Ocean Breeze

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 5, 2005
18,399
95
48
Somehow a western liberal will find a rationale, but the Iraqis who knew those killed people certainly don't give the insurgents such a high honor.

NOTHING in this disastrous scenario is about honor-----on 'their " side or the USR side.

The poor average Iraqi is just caught in the middle ......and hopes each day he survives the insanity. (an insanity created by HUMAN choice............not nature, not an industrial accident......but HUMAN MALICIOUS INTENT. )===malicious because it is based on the fundamental human factor of GREED. (for power, resources, fame and notoriaty, sense of importance , control.& a big fat ego.....)
 

jimmoyer

jimmoyer
Apr 3, 2005
5,101
22
38
69
Winchester Virginia
www.contactcorp.net
Military can't keep a secret?
How did you know?


Iraqis cooperate after insurgents slay tribal chief

By Antonio Castaneda
ASSOCIATED PRESS
Published December 5, 2005

SAMMARA, Iraq -- After keeping their distance for months, Iraqis in this Sunni Arab city suddenly began cooperating with U.S. troops, leading them to insurgents and hidden weapons caches. The reason: anger over a local tribal chief's assassination by insurgents.

"That's when they decided to make a stand," said Capt. Ryan Wylie of Lincoln, Neb., commander of Bravo Company, 3rd Battalion, 69th Armored Regiment. "They definitely had an idea of the terrorists and where they hang out."

U.S. commanders cite other reasons for a lull in violence in this city 60 miles north of Baghdad. They include construction of an 11-mile berm around the city to block gunrunners and a greater reliance by the military on covert monitoring positions.

But almost everyone agrees that the biggest reason for the reduction in violence here was the public backlash against the insurgents after the Oct. 11 assassination of Sheik Hikmat Mumtaz al-Bazi, chief of one of the area's seven tribes.
 

Ocean Breeze

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 5, 2005
18,399
95
48
Re: RE: Iraq (US Crime)Update

Colpy said:


come on colpy........ ;-)

I didn't SAY they WERE.......I merely postulated the possibility......

Apparently , the "latest" is that the USR is considering bringing home 30.000 of their military........but no time frame has been set. Wonder if this is to appease the public...
 

Ocean Breeze

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 5, 2005
18,399
95
48
After December 15, Iraq will be at mercy of US corporations
Michael Arvey, Online Journal Contributing Writer



December 14, 2005



If George W. Bush's policies on Iraq are mystifying, fret not -- there's a method to his organized chaos after all.

Bush's recent unveiling of a "plan" for victory in Iraq projected an exercise in utterly hollow rhetoric, unless it's understood to whose victory he is really referring. After the upcoming December 15 parliamentary elections in Iraq, victory will rest securely in the pockets of corporatists and their partners in the administration.

Although the national discussion revolves around exit strategies, democracy, torture, suicide bombers, et. al., it would appear that Bush's underlying intention is to stall until after December 15 before he'll openly ponder, with furrowed brow, any nod toward a military withdrawal. What will happen after December 15? U.S. corporations will have a headlock on Iraq's economy, most importantly its oil reserves, even though we were led to believe that oil, as a primary motivation behind the invasion, was conspiratorial nonsense, as with all inquiries that Bush wishes to avoid and dismiss.

As soon as the new Iraqi government provides the appearance of democratic legitimacy, major oil contracts known as Production Sharing Agreements (PSAs) between U.S. corporations and the newly minted, U.S.-friendly Iraqi government will be signed and sealed. Bush's ultimate invasion goal will be a fait accompli -- victory for the forces of privatization over an entire, towed-away nation. When Bush says that "rebuilding a nation devastated by a dictator is a large undertaking," he demonstrates, once again, his projective skills.

The Global Policy Forum explains how the above scenario will probably unfold: "The new Iraqi constitution of 2005, greatly influenced by U.S. advisors, contains language that guarantees a major role for foreign companies. Negotiators hope soon to complete deals on Production Sharing Agreements that will give the companies control over dozens of fields, including the fabled super-giant Majnoon, but no contracts can be signed until after the elections when a new government takes office."

Furthermore, according to a November 22, 2005, Reuters UK report, "For international oilmen, deprived of access to vast Iraqi reserves for decades, long-term PSAs offer the ability to book reserves, protection from future adverse legislation and healthy profits during low oil prices." Any poor and vastly deprived oilmen's names come to mind?

Along with Bush's unilateral March 2003 Executive Order No.13303, which seized full control of Iraq's oil revenues, Paul Bremer, former head of the Coalition Provisional Authority, concocted 100 Orders designed to control Iraq's economy and daily life. An August 5, 2004, Los Angeles Times story, for example, reports that Bremer's Order No. 39 carries an economic wallop: "(1) privatization of Iraq's 200 state-owned enterprises; (2) 100 percent foreign ownership of Iraqi enterprises; (3)'national treatment' -- which means no preferences for local over foreign businesses; (4) unrestricted tax-free remittance of all profits and other funds; and (5) 40-year ownership licenses."

Consider, too, Order No. 49, which "drops the top tax rate on corporations from a high of 40 percent to a flat 15 percent," and Order No. 40, which "allows banks to purchase up to 50 percent of Iraq's banks." Do any of these sound like diktats to shift Iraq's economy to a privatized one, and who exactly would such a forced shift benefit? Certainly not the citizens of Iraq for whom Bush weeps crocodile tears.

The plan from the onset was always clear: plunder and privatize, privatize. And as demagogic Bill O'Reilly says, "That's what ah'm talking about."

Interestingly, when U.S. soldiers invaded Baghdad, they named their initial bases Camp Shell and Camp Exxon -- even then they knew it'd eventually be a gusher of a war. And on December 15, just in time for Christmas, Bush's mission will be accomplished.

Copyright © 1998-2005 Online Journal


so as of this "election".......... mission accomplished??? US puppet in place ......US remains in "control" of Iraq......and running things via corporations . Largest military bases ever going ahead as planned.

Welcome to the NEW US.= IRAQ.

(of course NONE of this reality will be stated as the US sensationalizes the Iraqi elections. It is where they put their verbal emphasis........and what the sheeple will buy into.

and the rich get richer off the blood of a foreign nations population...(and their own)

"evil" is the only word for this.....
 

Colpy

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 5, 2005
21,887
848
113
70
Saint John, N.B.
I was extremely amused, and pleased I have to say, to note that Lt Colonel Daryll Mills is second in command of the anti-insurgency effort in Baghdad and the surrounding area.

He has held this job for over a year, according to the CBC National News.

Lt-Col. Mills is a member of the Canadian Armed Forces.
 

Jo Canadian

Council Member
Mar 15, 2005
2,488
1
38
PEI...for now
 

no1important

Time Out
Jan 9, 2003
4,125
0
36
57
Vancouver
members.shaw.ca
RE: Iraq (US Crime)Update

U.S. President to address nation on Iraq Sunday

A teaser:

WASHINGTON — President Bush will address the nation about Iraq on Sunday evening, his first speech from the Oval Office since he announced the beginning of the U.S.-led invasion in March 2003.

The address at 9 p.m. EST comes on the heels of a two-week, four-speech blitz to build support for a war that a majority of Americans now say was a mistake.

The White House said it was asking television networks for live coverage of the president's address, expected to run less than 20 minutes.[/end of teaser]

It will be interesting what spin he will have to say.
 

jimmoyer

jimmoyer
Apr 3, 2005
5,101
22
38
69
Winchester Virginia
www.contactcorp.net
Imagine if Bush was Chavez, commandeering all TV
networks with little notice and then pondering he
might go on for 4 hours, give or take an extra hour?

Hello, my friends! A very good evening to you. National network. No time limits. We've gone back to the original strategy. We'd made a change, a curveball on the outside corner for a few weeks with the Thursday national networks, but no, tonight we're going back to the original pitch; that is, whenever it's convenient, every time it's convenient. It could be one national network a week, or three or four a week, according to the dynamic of events. Or once a month. We'll see. We'll evaluate as we go according to what might be happening in Venezuela and the world. And also, no time limit. It's nine fifteen, and I think we'll end around midnight.


www.analitica.com/bitblioteca/hchavez /cadena20010615.asp.
 

no1important

Time Out
Jan 9, 2003
4,125
0
36
57
Vancouver
members.shaw.ca
RE: Iraq (US Crime)Update

Christian aid group vows to continue work in Iraq

A teaser:

Despite the uncertainty surrounding the fate of their four colleagues who disappeared in Baghdad three weeks ago, Christian Peacemaker Teams is pledging to continue its work in violence-racked nations such as Iraq.

"We are very concerned about our four colleagues and are working for their return," stated Sheila Provencher, 33, a CPT Iraq Team member currently working out of Amman said in a written statement released Saturday.

"We also continue to be concerned about the Iraqi families who experience killing, disappearance, and imprisonment of their loved ones every day.

[/end of teaser]

I wonder what has happened to those hostages? Nothing has come out for a long time.
 

no1important

Time Out
Jan 9, 2003
4,125
0
36
57
Vancouver
members.shaw.ca
Bush to warn against early withdrawal from Iraq

A teaser:

U.S. President George W. Bush is expected to warn his nation about the perils of a premature military withdrawal from Iraq in a prime-time speech tonight.

Bush will also say that Iraq's election last Thursday won't mean the end of violence in that country, but will mark the beginning of a constitutional democracy in the Middle East.

Leaving before Iraq was ready "would hand Iraq over to enemies who have pledged to attack us," the president said in remarks prepared for delivery in an Oval Office address.[/teaser]

Basically I think he has no intention of leaving, as long as he is king err President.
 

jimmoyer

jimmoyer
Apr 3, 2005
5,101
22
38
69
Winchester Virginia
www.contactcorp.net
Basically I think he has no intention of leaving, as long as he is king err President.
----------------------------------------no1important-----

I believe it is much more complex than that.

I do believe this President very much believes in what
he is doing.

I also very much disagree with how he goes about it.

And even in my disagreement I can see how little he
values the opposition or any credibility in any criticism.
He sees the Congress and Press make a lot of politics of
grandstanding but has little respect for their more
legitimate arguments beyond the more superficial
shallow arguments made.

Being able to discern the difference between legitimate
criticism and kneejerk criticism is a great failing of
what has truly become an Imperial Margerine President.

Not to respect opposition or even to look at any
credibility in the opposition tasks even the most
fairest of minds.

Even the neocons who are just about dead politically
(outsiders don't know this yet), certainly do feel
the deadly reaction and fallout of many of their wrong
predictions.

I believe of all critics, John McCain, has gotten through
this President's hard core resolve.

Most critics who actually reach over the divide do
so in a way that sees a little bit of both sides.


And John McCain had to do it in a very wise, passionate
maverick way.
 

Ocean Breeze

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 5, 2005
18,399
95
48
Iraqis Glad 2005 Over, Dim Hopes for 2006

*Inter Press Service*
Dahr Jamail and Arkan Hamed

*BAGHDAD, Dec 20 (IPS) - Despite the parliamentary elections last week
and temporary ease in violence, Iraqis remain bitter about the outgoing
year, and sceptical of 2006.*

"As a doctor I usually travel daily from home to college," said Um
Feras, a doctor of physics at Baghdad University who asked that her last
name be changed for her protection. "2005 was a terrible year, and now
it has become unacceptable for me to leave my house to go teach due to
the troops, who always where sunglasses even on gloomy days, aiming
their rifles at everyone like they are gangsters."

The majority of Iraqis in Baghdad now fear the security forces, as
dozens of people each week are "disappeared" by police and soldiers
around the city and new torture chambers have been discovered recently.

Dr. Feras told IPS that the daily chaos on the streets of Baghdad, such
as closed roads and bridges, always caused her to be late, as well as
most of her students.

"Nothing is good in Iraq now," said the doctor. "Torture, detained
friends, pillaging of houses, seeing neighbors suffering from poverty,
no electricity, no water and gun fights everywhere. We have no relief
from this suffering now."

Electricity in Baghdad remains far below pre-war levels, with most
houses enjoying 3-5 hours per day. Meanwhile, oil exports in December
have sunk to a two-year low while up to 22 percent of the 21 billion
dollar set aside by the U.S. government for reconstruction projects in
Iraq has been diverted to security, according to Dan Speckhard, the
director of the Iraq reconstruction management office, who made the
announcement to reporters earlier this month.

Asked about her hopes and expectations for 2006, the doctor says: "I
only want a normal life far away from the interests of those bastards
who invaded our country. I don't care about the elections and politics
and the new political parties because these are just a small part of the
strategy of the invaders."

The doctor began to cry then added: "My dream for the coming year is
that the invaders pull out, we have Iraqis who love one another to
govern Iraq, we build something related to civilization and have
emotions towards our land and lives in order to get back to the
situation where each of us loves the other and we feel the good will of
God."

She paused for reflection before saying, "But I can't say this will happen."

Other Iraqis, like 40 year-old leather worker Ismael Mohammed feel
similarly.

"2005 was worse than 2004 because the coalition forces are still
handling everything tightly in their hands and nothing has changed
except the faces of the governors," he told IPS in Baghdad, "They are
trying to get everything they can from Iraq, meanwhile financially it is
getting worse, fuel [availability] is worse and the roads are worse."

His feelings about the infrastructure are common around Baghdad, as Iraq
is suffering an unemployment rate of over 50 percent, oil exports remain
below pre-war levels, and the infrastructure remains in shambles amidst
the broken promises of the Bush Administration.

"Democracy? Where is our democracy?" asked Mohammed who said his best
day of 2005 was when one of his cousins was released from Abu Ghraib,
"Freedom? People shout with no one to hear. Everything goes with a bribe
now. You want to be a professor-easy, just give me the money and you are
a professor."

Mohammed told IPS he remains sad and perplexed as to why his cousin was
recently killed. "We are Shia. Yet he was killed."

And he asks: "Who profits from this constitution because we already had
one? Who is profiting from all of this? Iraqi leather used to be the
best all over the Middle East, but now it even seems as though the rain
has stopped falling in Iraq, as my trade has stopped growing. Now we
even have to import leather!"

According to the Institute for Policy Studies, a Washington-based think
tank, the value of Halliburton stock, U.S. Vice President Dick Cheney's
old military company to which he still has financial ties, has increased
138 percent since March 2003. Halliburton has been awarded at least 10
billion dollar in contracts for their operations in Iraq.

Meanwhile, U.S. citizens aren't benefiting from the occupation either.
The average monthly cost of the Iraq war for the U.S. is 5.6 billion
dollar for a total of over 225 billion dollar thus far, pushing their
national debt over 8 trillion dollar, according to the U.S. Department
of Treasury. For 2006, Mohammed voiced the dreams of many Iraqis.

"To get rid of the invaders and have God give back blessings to the
people of Iraq," Mohammed told IPS. "We want good people in positions of
authority who will compensate Iraqis who have suffered. I would like to
see Iraqis work as one unit, putting the good of the country ahead of
divisions between them and to go on dealing as humans."

Mohammed added: "We need a lot of work to obtain true sovereignty and to
cure the problems brought by the invaders, as independence isn't so easy
that we can get it in one year. Democracy cannot be given as simple as
that; we have to work hard for it and educate people to get it."


wanna bet the "INVADERS" are the biggest obstacle for Iraq to move forward?? But they intend to stay ......and maintain control.........while painting a fairy tale for the duped /brainwashed american population..........that is so isolated now , it has no comprehension about what is going on in the rest of the world due to their "elected" idiot leader.......who spins nothing but lies and fairy tales.
 

jimmoyer

jimmoyer
Apr 3, 2005
5,101
22
38
69
Winchester Virginia
www.contactcorp.net
The above article in previous post
made much of a very legitimate view of 2 or 3
Iraqis, but the BBC which has exposed a lot
of wrongdoing about this war conducted
6000 interviews.

See the results--------


Survey finds hope in occupied Iraq

An opinion poll suggests most Iraqis feel their lives have improved since the war in Iraq began about a year ago.
The survey, carried out for the BBC and other broadcasters, also suggests many are optimistic about the next 12 months and opposed to violence.

But of the 2,500 people questioned, 85% said the restoration of public security must be a major priority.

Opinion was split about who should be responsible, with an Iraqi government scoring highest.

Creating job opportunities was rated more likely to improve security effectively than hiring more police.


However on various issues, there were stark differences of opinion according to region or ethnic group.

About 6,000 interviews were carried out in total, half in Autumn last year and half this Spring, in a project run by Oxford Research International.


Seventy per cent of people said that things were going well or quite well in their lives, while only 29% felt things were bad.

And 56% said that things were better now than they were before the war.

Th poll company's director Dr Christoph Sahm, said Iraqis trained as interviewers travelled around the country to speak to randomly selected people in their homes.

The survey reflected Iraq's distribution of population, balance between men and women, and religious and ethnic mix.




Dr Sahm said: "I would call it very extensive; It is a national survey and it is also representative... the key finding is that Iraqis don't want to break up the country."
Meanwhile, an ICM poll of British attitudes about the Iraq war for BBC Newsnight's special programme, One Year On - Iraq, reveals that 48% of those questioned thought taking military action was the right thing to do; 43% thought it was not.

There is an almost even split on whether the war was legal, while 34% of interviewees believe the war has contributed to the security of the UK against 55% who believe it has not.

US 'will take heart'

In the poll of Iraqis, nearly 80% favoured a unified state with a central government in Baghdad; only 14% opted for a system of regional governments combined with a federal authority.


BRITISH OPINION POLL


The majority was even bigger among Iraqi Arabs, but for the Kurdish minority, the situation was reversed, with more than 70% backing a federal system.

There is an existing Kurdish regional government in the north, the powers of which were recognised by Iraq's interim constitution, signed last week.

BBC diplomatic correspondent Barnaby Mason says the American and British governments will take some comfort from the results.

The survey shows overwhelming disapproval of political violence, especially of attacks on the Iraqi police but also on American and other coalition forces.

But among Arabs, nearly one in five told the pollsters that attacks on coalition forces were acceptable.

About 15% say foreign forces should leave Iraq now, but many more say they should stay until an Iraqi government is in place or security is restored.


Looking back, more Iraqis think the invasion was right than wrong, although 41% felt that the invasion "humiliated Iraq".

But by ethnicity, only one in three Arabs believed their country was liberated - compared to four out of five Kurds.

Safety conscious

Dan Plesch, a security expert at Birkbeck college in London said that the poll was good news for the leaders of countries who began the invasion a year ago this week.


IRAQI OPINION POLL


"This poll indicates that Iraqis strongly support a unified country with strong leadership. They don't want to see the country divided up and they don't want to see an Islamic government."

Regaining security is rated as by far the highest priority at 85%, followed by holding elections for a national government (30%), ensuring the majority of Iraqis can make a decent living (30%) and reviving the economy (28%).

And only just over a third of people report that their electricity supply is good.


A key concern for the Americans as they prepare to hand over power in June is the unpopularity of the people they are putting in place.

Leaders unloved

Their favoured son Ahmed Chalabi had no support at all, while Saddam Hussein remains one of the six most popular politicians in the country.

Dr Mustafa Alani of the Royal United Services Institute said that the Iraqis wanted a strong leader, but had not found one yet.

"The main point is that the Iraqis are now looking for a strong leader who can save the day.

"As long as the governing council is considered illegitimate and illegal in Iraq, I think they will have to work hard to find something more legitimate and more legal before they disengage from the country."

Help with PDF files


Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/middle_east/3514504.stm

Published: 2004/03/16 19:02:28 GMT

© BBC MMV
 

jimmoyer

jimmoyer
Apr 3, 2005
5,101
22
38
69
Winchester Virginia
www.contactcorp.net
Killing of Iraq Kurds 'genocide'

A court in The Hague has ruled that the killing of thousands of Kurds in Iraq in the 1980s was an act of genocide.

The ruling came in the case of Dutch trader Frans van Anraat, who was given a 15-year sentence for selling chemicals to Saddam Hussein's regime.

He was found guilty of complicity in war crimes over a 1988 chemical attack that killed more than 5,000 people, but acquitted of genocide charges.

It is the first trial to deal with war crimes against Kurds in Iraq and Iran.



'Intent to destroy'

Dozens of ethnic Kurds gathered in the packed courtroom to hear the verdict.


The court has no other conclusion than that these attacks were committed with the intent to destroy the Kurdish population of Iraq
Court ruling

Before van Anraat could be convicted, the judges had to decide whether the 1988 attack on Iraqi Kurds in Halabja amounted to genocide.

According to the 1948 Geneva Convention, genocide is defined as "acts committed with the intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial or religious group".

The Dutch court said it considered "legally and convincingly proven that the Kurdish population meets requirement under Genocide Conventions as an ethnic group".

"The court has no other conclusion than that these attacks were committed with the intent to destroy the Kurdish population of Iraq," the ruling said.

However, observers say the Dutch court's decision may not have much influence on the Iraqi tribunal, which is hearing the trial of Saddam Hussein.

The court is believed to be preparing a case against him for the use of chemical weapons in Halabja in northern Iraq.

'Contribution'

Van Anraat was not in court to hear the verdict.


He was charged with supplying thousands of tons of raw materials for chemical weapons used in the 1980-1988 war against Iran, and against Iraqi Kurds.
The court found him guilty of aiding war crimes, as "his deliveries facilitated the attacks".

"He cannot counter with the argument that this would have happened even without his contribution," the presiding judge said.

However, the judges ruled that van Anraat was not aware of the genocidal intentions of the Iraqi regime when he sold the ingredients for poison gas.

Victims' relatives clapped when the sentence was read out, while dozens danced in a circle to drums outside the court.

Defence lawyers said they would appeal against the sentence, which was the maximum that could be imposed for the charge.

The 63-year-old was arrested in 1989 in Italy at the request of the US Government.

He was later released and fled to Iraq, where he remained until 2003.

He was arrested in December 2004 at his Amsterdam home.


Send us your comments using the form below.

This decision is historic because it recognizes at least one act of genocide against Kurds perpetrated in Iraq by the regime of Saddam Hussein. There are of course other genocidal campaigns in Iraq but this is justice for those innocent victims and a legal recognition of an act of genocide against Kurds. As a Kurd who has lost some dear relatives in the deadly attack of Halabja in 1988, I'm grateful for the Dutch court for its unbiased and conscientious verdict. The next step should be compensation of living relatives of Halabja victims.
Dr Nazhad Khasraw Hawramany, Basel, Switzerland

Perhaps a timely reminder to those who like taking a swipe at the American and British leaders. Maybe people should reflect on this when they start comparing freely elected Western leaders with Saddam or when considering whether he has a "fair" trial.
Peter, Provincia di Treviso, Italy

It's about time someone recognized at the world level that the Kurds have been persecuted and harassed ever since the UK artificially drew country lines in that region. I supported the Kurds during the first Iraq War to get them safely back to their homes in Kirkuk among others.
Tony Carey, Edgewater, USA

Well done the Dutch! This is a momentous day indeed. As a lawyer, and more particularly as a Kurd, the War Crimes' Court's finding of genocide today is a watershed. Hopefully it will be the first of many cases to try those "businessmen" suppliers of nefarious weaponry to Saddam's regime. This is only the beginning of course.
Azad, UK, Edinburgh





Name
Your E-mail address
Town & Country
Comments



Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/europe/4555000.stm

Published: 2005/12/23 17:01:30 GMT

© BBC MMV