Re: Is the insurgency in Iraq being faked?
Is the insurgency in Iraq being perpetrated by the Americans just to continue the occupation?
http://tinyurl.com/8zta2
He is writing about a kidnapped victim in Iraq. The group of "terrorists" who got him doesn't seem real somehow, and the author figures it means the acts of terrorism in Iraq, the insurgency, is being perpetrated by the Americans just to continue the occupation.
To make more sense of it, read from the link, but you get the gist of it. I don't doubt it, we've been hearing this for awhule now.
There is no reason to stay, just as there was no reason to go invade Iraq in the first place., other than for corporate protection and opportunity in Iraq, which is just part of the agenda of the oil-Elite Bush cabal in controlling oil supply.
More on Iraq invasion agenda:
http://tinyurl.com/csepk
Is the insurgency in Iraq being perpetrated by the Americans just to continue the occupation?
http://tinyurl.com/8zta2
He is writing about a kidnapped victim in Iraq. The group of "terrorists" who got him doesn't seem real somehow, and the author figures it means the acts of terrorism in Iraq, the insurgency, is being perpetrated by the Americans just to continue the occupation.
In Bushzarro world, where Pentagon black ops are conducted in the name of the Iraqi resistance, it makes perfect sense to abduct and threaten to kill an engineer who worked to bring clean water to the Iraqi people.
[Their other] goal—to make the resistance out to be blood-thirsty savages, demented Islamic fanatics determined to kill as many people as possible
To make more sense of it, read from the link, but you get the gist of it. I don't doubt it, we've been hearing this for awhule now.
There is no reason to stay, just as there was no reason to go invade Iraq in the first place., other than for corporate protection and opportunity in Iraq, which is just part of the agenda of the oil-Elite Bush cabal in controlling oil supply.
More on Iraq invasion agenda:
http://tinyurl.com/csepk
[Some] have asserted that the second Iraq war is, like the first one, a power grab aimed at assuring continued American access to Middle Eastern oil.
In the end, all war is about economics, but it is overly simplistic to attribute the US strategy in the Middle East to a single cause, or more to the point, a single commodity.
This war is not about security, democracy, or the ending of tyranny or even terrorism; the war in Iraq is the first salvo of a trade war. It is the first in what will eventually be a series of wars whose purpose is to establish the security necessary for the United States to dominate the agenda and process of globalization