Income splitting helps fewer than 1 in 6 families, PBO says

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,817
471
83
Better than 0 I guess.


Income splitting helps fewer than 1 in 6 families, PBO says

Budget watchdog says famliy tax cut will cost $2.2 billion this

The parliamentary budget officer says the family tax cut announced last year will cost the federal government about $2.2 billion this year and will benefit fewer than one in six households.

Stephen Harper announces family tax cut, child care benefit boost
8 things you need to know before claiming new family tax cut
Doubling TFSA limit will only help wealthy, study argues
The program is meant to fulfill the Conservatives' 2011 election promise to bring in income splitting for families once the budget was balanced.

"The FTC [family tax credit] benefits about two million households, or 15 per cent of the Canadian total," a newly released report by the PBO says.

It goes on to say "middle and middle-high income households benefit most because they are more likely to have a family income and income tax structure conducive to FTC gains."

Opposition critics have complained since the scheme's unveiling that it is inherently unfair because its benefits are skewed toward the wealthy.

That criticism seems to be in line with what a former finance minister concluded last year.

The late Jim Flaherty, while he was still in the finance portfolio, denounced his own government's plan as one that "benefits some parts of the Canadian population a lot — and other parts of the Canadian population virtually not at all."

Since that time, the government significantly modified the original promise and turned outright income-splitting into a non-refundable federal tax credit — and capped it at $2,000.

At the time of the announcement, Prime Minister Stephen Harper acknowledged "concerns had been raised" about the original, unrestricted promise as being simply too expensive.

Finance minister reacts

In addition to the family tax credit, the government also expanded the universal childcare benefit — boosting the monthly payment to families with children under age 6 to $160 from $100.

It also introduced a new payment for children aged 6 to 17 of $60 a month.

In response to the parliamentary budget officer's report, Finance Minister Joe Oliver defended the program.

"Under our Conservative government, the tax burden on Canadians is at the lowest level in more than 50 years," he said in a statement. "The family tax cut and enhanced universal child care benefit will benefit 100 per cent of families with kids — the vast majority of benefits going to low- and middle-income families."


Share this story

http://www.cbc.ca/m/news/politics/i...fewer-than-1-in-6-families-pbo-says-1.2997972
 

taxslave

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 25, 2008
36,362
4,340
113
Vancouver Island
Welfare benefits fewer than 1 in 6 households too. Perhaps we should eliminate that too.

I always get a kick out of the pretend indignation of the left about the wealthy getting tax cuts. Who do they think should get tax cuts? The people that pay taxes or the people that already pay no taxes. If they truly wanted to make things equal the poor should pay 50% income tax as well.
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
548
113
Vernon, B.C.
Welfare benefits fewer than 1 in 6 households too. Perhaps we should eliminate that too.

I always get a kick out of the pretend indignation of the left about the wealthy getting tax cuts. Who do they think should get tax cuts? The people that pay taxes or the people that already pay no taxes. If they truly wanted to make things equal the poor should pay 50% income tax as well.

Eggs Zachery! :) :)
 

DaSleeper

Trolling Hypocrites
May 27, 2007
33,676
1,666
113
Northern Ontario,
Just for the hell of it the other day I figured out our taxes...both ways with income splitting and without ( you have to remember that only my company pension is eligible , not CPP or OAS
It's easy to do...you look at the numbers before and after you choose income splitting on the tax program.
The results... a little over $2000 more payable jointly without income splitting. It might have been more if we hadn't cashed in a spousal RRSP.....
 

tay

Hall of Fame Member
May 20, 2012
11,548
1
36
Better than 0 I guess.


Income splitting helps fewer than 1 in 6 families, PBO says

Budget watchdog says famliy tax cut will cost $2.2 billion this

The parliamentary budget officer says the family tax cut announced last year will cost the federal government about $2.2 billion this year and will benefit fewer than one in six households.



At the time of the announcement, Prime Minister Stephen Harper acknowledged "concerns had been raised" about the original, unrestricted promise as being simply too expensive.



Share this story

http://www.cbc.ca/m/news/politics/i...fewer-than-1-in-6-families-pbo-says-1.2997972




Mobile links don't work .........




Stephen Harper's ex-speechwriter blasts income splitting as "socialism for the wealthy"






It seems Stephen Harper can't even get people who used to work for him to get behind income splitting.


The late Finance Minister Jim Flaherty expressed his concerns last year, saying the scheme needed a rethink because"there are some people who benefit and lots of people who don't in that world of income splitting."


We also heard from the conservative-minded C.D. Howe Institute, who criticized income splitting for shutting out "single parents — those in greatest need of such help — and little or none for lower-earning couples with children."


Now former Harper speech writer Michael Taube has taken to the Toronto Sun to speak out against the scheme:
"When you really think about income splitting, it’s the equivalent of state-run socialism for the wealthy. A few of us will shift income to get a tax credit directly from the government, paid for by taxpayers."
Taube added that the criticism is "coming a from a right-wing conservative, folks. Think about that."

Taube lists three main criticisms of Harper's income splitting scheme:

1. "Income splitting is a lousy political strategy"

He says income splitting "looks like we're favouring the wealthy, paying lip service to the middle class, and thumbing our noses at the poor."

2. "85% of hard-working Canadian families will never see a dime"

But they will "pay for this multibillion-dollar program through their income taxes."

3. Savings from income splitting are "minimal" for ordinary families

He says that contrary to popular belief, many Canadian families "don't have huge disparities in their annual salaries," so they can't benefit based on the structure of the scheme. "Hence, they'll collect very little of the $2,000 tax credit."


The Conservatives have tinkered with their original income splitting plan by placing a $2,000 cap on it, but a report released this week by the Parliamentary Budget Office highlighted that income splitting only benefits 15% of Canadian households, with the wealthiest Canadian families as its greatest benefactors.


"The eligibility rates for households in the bottom 20 per cent of income are near zero," says the report.


And according to a detailed PBO analysis looking at which familes get what in the $2.2 billion program, families with primary income earners make $100,000 or more will receive $750 million in tax breaks from Harper's Conservatives -- over a third of the total benefits alone.


more




Stephen Harper's ex-speechwriter blasts income splitting as "socialism for the wealthy" | Press Progress
 

Angstrom

Hall of Fame Member
May 8, 2011
10,659
0
36
It helped me a whole lot.

I fall in the category of:

Of parents who decided to have one stay at home to raise our young kids.

Parents who send their kids to daycare are already getting tax cut via expenses deduction for cost of daycare.

The title should read income split finally helps parents that chose to raise their own children, unlike daycare sending parents that were already getting government help. Parents who had one stay at home was not being compensated with any tax credit at all.

5 out of 6 parents were getting government help via daycare expenses deduction. 1 in 6 was not getting nothing.

Thank you Harper for recognizing the unfair inequality.
 

B00Mer

Make Canada Great Again
Sep 6, 2008
47,127
8,145
113
Rent Free in Your Head
www.canadianforums.ca
How many times does Flossy need to post and repost this story?

 

Angstrom

Hall of Fame Member
May 8, 2011
10,659
0
36
How many times does Flossy need to post and repost this story?

He will repost it until his little lefty brain understands that 5 out of 6 parents are already getting a tax exemption for daycare costs. And that the 1 in 6 that were staying at home and losing income from that decision will finally get a equivalent tax deduction to the rest of the 5 in 6 parents.

How anyone can be against a tax credit to help parents raise their own children blows my mind right out of the water. I guess it's really too conservative to think one parent would stay at home, for a liberals or a neo democrats mind.

Only rich people would make a decision like that!!!!
Or people that actually love their children more then their careers.