That's my point, I can point at the searing blinding climate regulator with my finger, and you're claim is supported by invisable benevolent harmless gas. I am dim but you're blind.
How the GW myth is perpetuated
- Thread starter Walter
- Start date
That's my point, I can point at the searing blinding climate regulator with my finger, and you're claim is supported by invisable benevolent harmless gas. I am dim but you're blind.
So CO2 is a climate regulator----given-----at .008 or so leaving the bulk of the regulating to the sun at 99.9 and a bit. Furthermore if the sun is blotted out entirely thee planet frezzes if the CO2 gets adjusted as recommend, fok all happens, I bet in the next feww yeaars global warming freaks will disappear almost entirely, most of them having been frozen
Oh Boy, is a subject that no one in the world knows the exact correct answer really worth causing bickering and hard feelings? For myself I'd be content to err on the side of safety and be conservative in my use of energy!
That's not true, I can say with absolute confidence that the sun controls the climate of this planet. I have no bad feelings, I have only funny feelings about this subject and the controversy surrounding the nutty argument.
OK, you pretty well paraphrased what I said!
It's called hedging your bets!
"invisable benevolent harmless gas"??? Uhhh... ok, so you don't accept the greenhouse effect... is that right? I guess there's no point in challenging you to provide evidence of direct and indirect solar influences accounting for the most relatively recent global warming of the past century and more pointedly over the last 30-40 years.
Steve Goddard @SteveSGoddard Climate science is easy to understand. If you want government funding, you deliver the answer the government wants.
hasn't your affinty for that guy burned you enough already? Since Goddard has never formally published a damn thing in his life, he certainly is an authoratative souce to speak of funding grants!... oh snap, is that why he refuses to publish... he can't get any! 8O C'mon Locutus, clue your guy in... with some of the denier preferred new online journal targets, the "pay to publish" kind, Goddard just needs to come up with some minimal scratch and they'll publish it for him... and it's cheap, like borscht!
Professor Emeritus Hal Lewis Resigns from American Physical Society
"For reasons that will soon become clear my former pride at being an APS Fellow all these years has been turned into shame, and I am forced, with no pleasure at all, to offer you my resignation from the Society."It is of course, the global warming scam, with the (literally) trillions of dollars driving it, that has corrupted so many scientists, and has carried APS before it like a rogue wave. It is the greatest and most successful pseudoscientific fraud I have seen in my long life as a physicist. Anyone who has the faintest doubt that this is so should force himself to read the ClimateGate documents, which lay it bare. (Montford's book organizes the facts very well.) I don't believe that any real physicist, nay scientist, can read that stuff without revulsion. I would almost make that revulsion a definition of the word scientist.
"So what has the APS, as an organization, done in the face of this challenge? It has accepted the corruption as the norm, and gone along with it.
"So what has the APS, as an organization, done in the face of this challenge? It has accepted the corruption as the norm, and gone along with it.
jeezaz that's old news! He did get his shot in though... before he died! Is this significant to you? I could take one group, say the AGU, and counter with a throw down of thousands of names/cv's of the most prominent scientists in the world... or even within APS itself. But of course, that wouldn't count... cause there's "Hal Lewis" (or at least his ghost) in your corner! :lol: