I think it's time we did start considering that with 7 billion people on the planet there is a slight possibility that the population might be contributing to a rise in temperature. Put 7 people in a room and the temperature rises.
Heat wave smashes records around the world — a look at the sizzling temperatures
- Thread starter mentalfloss
- Start date
No. Not at all. Shake off the brainwashing.
Annual global temperature is 1C. Just a **** hair above freezing.
Annual global temperature is 1C. Just a **** hair above freezing.
We have no impact on geomagnetics or the sun.
Because boreal spruce and feather moss work together ensure the fires spread far and wide in order to renew the forest. They basically commit suicide.
Thanks to fire fighting and aged weak trees they can't or even possibly won't produce their own rain.
Why do the scientists find this so difficult to understand? Idiots!
As every sensible person is!
There are plenty in the geomagnetic/sun spot camp but how do you tax people to fund industry to go with abundant, dirt cheap natural gas and drastically cut grid maintenance costs when you can't blame it on them and guilt them out of their money?
If they cranked up GST, people would scream bloody murder.
Abstract
Recent studies have shown that, in addition to the role of solar variability, past climate changes may have been connected with variations in the Earth’s magnetic field elements at various timescales. An analysis of variations in geomagnetic field elements, such as field intensity, reversals, and excursions, allowed us to establish a link between climate changes at various timescales over the last millennia. Of particular interest are sharp changes in the geomagnetic field intensity and short reversals of the magnetic poles (excursions). The beginning and termination of the examined geomagnetic excursions can be attributed to periods of climate change. In this study, we analyzed the possible link between short-term geomagnetic variability (jerks) and climate change, as well as the accelerated drift of the north magnetic pole and surface temperature variations.
The results do not rule out the possibility that geomagnetic field variations which modulate the cosmic ray flux could have played a major role in climate change in addition to previously induced by solar radiation.
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S0016793212080063
Résumé:
Understanding climate change is an active topic of research. Much of the observed increase in global surface temperature over the past 150 years occurred prior to the 1940s and after the 1980s. The main causes invoked are solar variability, changes in atmospheric greenhouse gas content or sulfur due to natural or anthropogenic action, or internal variability of the coupled ocean-atmosphere system. Magnetism has seldom been invoked, and evidence for connections between climate and magnetic field variations have received little attention. We review evidence for correlations which could suggest such (causal or non-causal) connections at various time scales (recent secular variation similar to 10-100 yr, historical and archcomagnetic change similar to 100-5000 yr, and excursions and reversals similar to 101-10, yr), and attempt to suggest mechanisms. Evidence for correlations, which invoke Milankovic forcing in the core, either directly or through changes in ice distribution and moments of inertia of the Earth, is still tenuous. Correlation between decadal changes in amplitude of geomagnetic variations of external origin, solar irradiance and global temperature is stronger. It suggests that solar irradiance could have been a major forcing function of climate until the mid-1980s, when "anomalous" warming becomes apparent. The most intriguing feature may be the recently proposed archeomagnetic jerks, i.e. fairly abrupt (similar to 100 yr long) geomagnetic field variations found at irregular intervals over the past few millennia, using the archeological record from Europe to the Middle East. These seem to correlate with significant climatic events in the eastern North Atlantic region. A proposed mechanism involves variations in the geometry of the geomagnetic field (f.i. tilt of the dipole to lower latitudes), resulting in enhanced cosmic-ray induced nucleation of clouds. No forcing factor, be it changes in CO2 concentration in the atmosphere or changes in cosmic ray flux modulated by solar activity and geomagnetism, or possibly other factors, can at present be neglected or shown to be the overwhelming single driver of climate change in past centuries. Intensive data acquisition is required to further probe indications that the Earth's and Sun's magnetic fields may have significant bearing on climate change at certain time scales. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Are there connections between the Earth's magnetic field and climate? | INSTITUT DE PHYSIQUE DU GLOBE DE PARIS
Recent studies have shown that, in addition to the role of solar variability, past climate changes may have been connected with variations in the Earth’s magnetic field elements at various timescales. An analysis of variations in geomagnetic field elements, such as field intensity, reversals, and excursions, allowed us to establish a link between climate changes at various timescales over the last millennia. Of particular interest are sharp changes in the geomagnetic field intensity and short reversals of the magnetic poles (excursions). The beginning and termination of the examined geomagnetic excursions can be attributed to periods of climate change. In this study, we analyzed the possible link between short-term geomagnetic variability (jerks) and climate change, as well as the accelerated drift of the north magnetic pole and surface temperature variations.
The results do not rule out the possibility that geomagnetic field variations which modulate the cosmic ray flux could have played a major role in climate change in addition to previously induced by solar radiation.
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S0016793212080063
Résumé:
Understanding climate change is an active topic of research. Much of the observed increase in global surface temperature over the past 150 years occurred prior to the 1940s and after the 1980s. The main causes invoked are solar variability, changes in atmospheric greenhouse gas content or sulfur due to natural or anthropogenic action, or internal variability of the coupled ocean-atmosphere system. Magnetism has seldom been invoked, and evidence for connections between climate and magnetic field variations have received little attention. We review evidence for correlations which could suggest such (causal or non-causal) connections at various time scales (recent secular variation similar to 10-100 yr, historical and archcomagnetic change similar to 100-5000 yr, and excursions and reversals similar to 101-10, yr), and attempt to suggest mechanisms. Evidence for correlations, which invoke Milankovic forcing in the core, either directly or through changes in ice distribution and moments of inertia of the Earth, is still tenuous. Correlation between decadal changes in amplitude of geomagnetic variations of external origin, solar irradiance and global temperature is stronger. It suggests that solar irradiance could have been a major forcing function of climate until the mid-1980s, when "anomalous" warming becomes apparent. The most intriguing feature may be the recently proposed archeomagnetic jerks, i.e. fairly abrupt (similar to 100 yr long) geomagnetic field variations found at irregular intervals over the past few millennia, using the archeological record from Europe to the Middle East. These seem to correlate with significant climatic events in the eastern North Atlantic region. A proposed mechanism involves variations in the geometry of the geomagnetic field (f.i. tilt of the dipole to lower latitudes), resulting in enhanced cosmic-ray induced nucleation of clouds. No forcing factor, be it changes in CO2 concentration in the atmosphere or changes in cosmic ray flux modulated by solar activity and geomagnetism, or possibly other factors, can at present be neglected or shown to be the overwhelming single driver of climate change in past centuries. Intensive data acquisition is required to further probe indications that the Earth's and Sun's magnetic fields may have significant bearing on climate change at certain time scales. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Are there connections between the Earth's magnetic field and climate? | INSTITUT DE PHYSIQUE DU GLOBE DE PARIS
Where the heck did you get those figures??
For example, the average annual temperature for the globe between 1951 and 1980 was around 57.2 degrees Fahrenheit (14 degrees Celsius). In 2015, the hottest year on record, the temperature was about 1.8 degrees F (1 degree C)_warmer than the 1951–1980 base period. That calculation comes from NASA and NOAA.
Many science entities do it slightly different;y but the results are no more than slightly different. But hey the difference from the article you are citing was publishedin 2012. It seems the world has changed greatly in 6 years!!
Last edited:
He gets those figures by keeping temperature records just outside of his house in Saskatchewan.
Global Temperature
LATEST ANNUAL AVERAGE ANOMALY: 2017
0.9 °C
https://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/global-temperature/
The latest Annual Anomaly 2017
You know the neat little graph they posted on that site does a really great job of showing how much warmer the world is becoming. Darn hard to ignore!
TIME SERIES: 1884 TO 2017 I recommend everyone go to that site and do the time chart for themselves,
Data source: NASA/GISS
Credit: NASA Scientific Visualization Studio
1884
Time Series: 1884 to 2017, image#0
Time Series: 1884 to 2017 key
1884
You know the neat little graph they posted on that site does a really great job of showing how much warmer the world is becoming. Darn hard to ignore!
TIME SERIES: 1884 TO 2017 I recommend everyone go to that site and do the time chart for themselves,
Data source: NASA/GISS
Credit: NASA Scientific Visualization Studio
1884
Time Series: 1884 to 2017, image#0
Time Series: 1884 to 2017 key
1884
What is missing from this line "Annual global temperature is 1C. Just a **** hair above freezing" that is in your assertions?
Don't keep confirming your ignorance!! What about anomaly do you not understand!! It isn't for the whole year and was not sustained.