No... but neither did the Afghanistan War.Do you think the NDP just sprang up last election?
Thanks for the evidence, though.
No... but neither did the Afghanistan War.Do you think the NDP just sprang up last election?
Then I suggest you start reading some archives and Parliamentary history.No...
What's to fold? Your silly claims? Make believe commentary that isn't in the Macleans article?
Sorry dude, I don't live in your make believe version of reality.
I don't. I'm not you, Gh or one of the other usual suspects.Well bear, Who's make believe version of reality do you live in???
I don't. I'm not you, Gh or one of the other usual suspects.
Just a word of advice there Juan, if you're going to troll, don't troll people that have historically made you cry like a baby.
Oh please pumpkin. You go crying to the Mods, and Kreskin comes along and tries to take me down a couple pegs.Show me bear where you made anyone cry, with the exception maybe of your parents
That wasn't my parents crying, that was your wife, when I turned her out on the corner.
How would you know how small juan's junk is Abtfet?Ya, she laughed so hard she started to cry after he dropped his pants.
How would you know how small juan's junk is Gh?
Rhetorical Gh, I don't really want to know.
Then you shouldn't have dragged it down there Juan.I think this topic, whatever, has sunk below the level where I want to be involved with it.
I know, I know, because you say so Abtfet.nice twist..... but still a miss.
Here's the timeline stumpy.
Also, voting against increases to the military is not showing a lack of anything. It is showing that the NDP, which I personally support, feels that our military should be for defense only and therefore does not require the moneys or hardware to go out of country.
Voting for the freeloaders explains a lot.
We're all fully aware of your MO.
How does you voting for the freeloader party, so your pogey checks keep growing and coming playing into that silly comment?Of course it does, cause we gotta be out there killing anything and anyone that doesn't think like we do.
Ya, we already know you have an invisible friend Abtfet. Hopefully this one doesn't commit suicide too.As we are yours.
How does you voting for the freeloader party, so your pogey checks keep growing and coming playing into that silly comment?
What MO is that Abtfet?and there's another example of your MO.
Yep, I'm surprised you caught that. Did Jenn point it out?and you call me an ideologue.
Are we already at that stage of the conversation Abtfet?What a fu ckin moron.
Nope, never said that. I said that picking up a Minister to fly him somewhere is not the same thing as searching for say, fisherman who capsized at position X and have been in the water for 3 hours.
I really think this is false equivalence. I really don't think the military is so inept that the choice is to train on the roles they are expected to perform, or transport a Minister in order to keep the hours up. If that is the actual dichotomy, then our government is seriously mishandling the Defense file.
Just to add, I should be clear. I'm actually fine with them using the Challenger jets, that are intended to transport VIP's. I'm not fine with flying hours on search and rescue helicopters being used for transporting VIP's.
What MO is that Abtfet?
Yep, I'm surprised you caught that. Did Jenn point it out?
Are we already at that stage of the conversation Abtfet?
Yes, yes you are lately.a waste of time.
Tacky? It's intellectually dishonest to completely evade a question, and instead use it as a mean to claim another member doesn't support the troops.
And in the larger picture, it's intellectually dishonest to equate wanting a smaller military with not supporting the troops. It's on the same level of intellectually dishonesty as calling them unpatriotic, or un-Canadian or something.