Gun Control is Completely Useless.

[Decapoda]

Hey Hoid is this another case of not the Gangbangers fault?

Deadly two days: Regina police now confirm three homicides

The gun did it...the illegal, prohibited, sawed-off .22

Also interesting that the accused killer was himself previously shot in the face with "duck shot" from a sawed-off 12 gauge. Why do I get the feeling this guy was not into duck hunting....and wonder when duck hunting is going to be banned now.

 

[Twin_Moose]

3 of the 4 are drug related, not sure about the young lady, but I'm willing to bet it was over drugs as well.

 

[Hoid]

The main thing is to just make sure all these duck-hunting gang bangers have free and easy access to any sort of weapons they might need.

 

[Twin_Moose]

The main thing is to just make sure all these duck-hunting gang bangers have free and easy access to any sort of weapons they might need.

And that is the fault of law abiding Pal holders?

 

[Decapoda]

The main thing is to just make sure all these duck-hunting gang bangers have free and easy access to any sort of weapons they might need.

Well since these are all long-guns being used which are legal to posses that are being sawed off by criminals, it would seem that the best solution by liberal logic would be to ban hack saws.

 

[Decapoda]

And that is the fault of law abiding Pal holders?

No..

 

[Hoid]

Well since these are all long-guns being used which are legal to posses that are being sawed off by criminals, it would seem that the best solution by liberal logic would be to ban hack saws.

Or long guns...

 

[Decapoda]

Or long guns...

...Or maybe criminal behavior.

Maybe if Trudeau and the libs put 1 tenth of the effort and money into youth programs and helping support screwed up kids and their screwed up families as we do grabbing shit from innocent law abiding people, maybe we would actually be moving towards solving a problem. I thought progs loved their big fat government social programs. the profound ignorance and stupidity of the left knows no bounds.

 

[AnnaEmber]

It would result in the criminalization of possession of assault weapons.

Like I said, thickheaded. Firstly, assault rifles are already illegal as they are automatic (also conversions are illegal), and secondly it's already been pointed out the only difference between what you call an assault rifle and a hunting rifle is the rifles' shapes. Semiautos are semiautos. DUH

 

[Hoid]

If they are already illegal then why is anybody upset about it?

You can define anything you want to define by simply writing down it's name on a piece of paper, We do it all the time. DUH

For instance - are skateboards and scooters with electric engines on them "motor vehicles"?

Hint: they are if we say they are and put them in the list of things that are.

 

[AnnaEmber]

Or long guns...

.... or just keep idiots like you from owning guns, sharp objects, poisons, pencils, vehicles, screwdrivers, and whatever else one can kill with..

 

[AnnaEmber]

If they are already illegal then why is anybody upset about it?

You can define anything you want to define by simply writing down it's name on a piece of paper, We do it all the time. DUH

For instance - are skateboards and scooters with electric engines on them "motor vehicles"?

Hint: they are if we say they are and put them in the list of things that are.

You're the one that wants to ban guns that are already illegal. And "assault rifles" is already defined. DUH
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assault_rifle

 

[Decapoda]

If they are already illegal then why is anybody upset about it?.

Finally, a reasonable question from you...if they are already illegal then what the hell is Trudeau and Bill Blair getting all f***ing twisted up about? Wish I could help you with that one, sport.

 

[Hoid]

Yes because it isn't you that is getting all twisted up it's them.

 

[Hoid]

You're the one that wants to ban guns that are already illegal. And "assault rifles" is already defined. DUH
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assault_rifle

You are the one who is against banning something that is already illegal and any definition can be refined.

For instance a word like "motor vehicle" could be refined in definition to include certain electric powered vehicles that did not exist or were not even imagined at the time "motor vehicle" was first defined in law.

 

[DaSleeper]

And that is the fault of law abiding Pal holders?

You heard the saying "Never argue with an idiot"?


I'm sure they were referring to Hoid/Waldo!

 

[Decapoda]

Yes because it isn't you that is getting all twisted up it's them.

Correct, they are getting so twisted up they're spending millions of tax dollars on studying something that's already illegal, and billions into a proposed confiscation that solves precisely nothing. It's mental, isn't it? Really glad to see the light bulb is finally starting to flicker in your head.

 

[Hoid]

Kaboom

 

[AnnaEmber]

You are the one who is against banning something that is already illegal

No, you pathetic blunder. I am against you morons redefining assault rifles and then banning them on that basis.
haha I suggest you lay off the illegal drugs and get clean.

 

[Hoid]

No, you pathetic blunder. I am against you morons redefining assault rifles and then banning them on that basis.
haha I suggest you lay off the illegal drugs and get clean.

You look at every single weapon and decide if it fits your criteria.

It isn't difficult to do.