Very obtuse observations.I only caught the highlights an hour or two ago as the Aussie media & entertainment shows made fun of most of it.... No, they made fun of just about everything including Clint Eastwood's attempt to trash an imaginary Obama that he kept turning towards.... Yet all there was when he kept turning to his left was an empty chair that he kept talking to.
Somebody either forgot their glasses or forgot their senile pills.
Glad I missed the whole thing. Seemed like much of the same crap as every other Republican Campaign / Convention and was pretty much word for word as Palin & McCain's crap.
The Aussie media summed it up pretty well though.
A lot of Obama attacks, very little substance and a complete show of obliviousness by the Republicans on who screwed everything up in the first place.
Very obtuse observations.
One of the funniest columns I've read in weeks; Dave Barry move over.Mr. Romney Reinvents History
Mitt Romney wrapped the most important speech of his life, for Thursday night’s session of his convention, around an extraordinary reinvention of history — that his party rallied behind President Obama when he won in 2008, hoping that he would succeed. “That president was not the choice of our party,” he said. “We are a good and generous people who are united by so much more than divides us.”
The truth, rarely heard this week in Tampa, Fla., is that the Republicans charted a course of denial and obstruction from the day Mr. Obama was inaugurated, determined to deny him a second term by denying him any achievement, no matter the cost to the economy or American security — even if it meant holding the nation’s credit rating hostage to a narrow partisan agenda.
Mr. Romney’s big speech, delivered in a treacly tone with a strange misty smile on his face suggesting he was always about to burst into tears, was of a piece with the rest of the convention. Republicans have offered precious little of substance but a lot of bromides (“A free world is a more peaceful world!”) meant to convey profundity and take passive-aggressive digs at President Obama. But no subjects have received less attention, or been treated with less honesty, than foreign affairs and national security — and Mr. Romney’s banal speech was no exception.
It’s easy to understand why the Republicans have steered clear of these areas. While President Obama is vulnerable on some domestic issues, the Republicans have no purchase on foreign and security policy. In a television interview on Wednesday, Condoleezza Rice, the former secretary of state, could not name an area in which Mr. Obama had failed on foreign policy.
For decades, the Republicans were able to present themselves as the tougher party on foreign and military policy. Mr. Obama has robbed them of that by being aggressive on counterterrorism and by flexing military and diplomatic muscle repeatedly and effectively.
Mitt Romney has tried to sound tough, but it’s hard to see how he would act differently from Mr. Obama except in ways that are scary — like attacking Iran, or overspending on defense in ways that would not provide extra safety but would hurt the economy.
Before Thursday night, the big foreign policy speeches were delivered by Senator John McCain and Ms. Rice. Mr. McCain was specific on one thing: Mr. Obama’s plan to start pulling out of Afghanistan at the end of 2014 is too rapid. While he does not speak for Mr. Romney, his other ideas were unnerving, like suggesting that the United States should intervene in Syria.
Mr. Romney reportedly considered Ms. Rice as a running mate, and she seems to have real influence. But Ms. Rice is a reminder of the colossal errors and deceptions of George W. Bush’s administration. She was a central player in the decision to invade Iraq and the peddling of fantasies about weapons of mass destruction. She barely mentioned Iraq in her speech and spoke not at all about Afghanistan. She was particularly ludicrous when she talked about keeping America strong at home so it could be strong globally, since she was part of the team that fought two wars off the books and entirely on borrowed money.
Ms. Rice said the United States has lost its “exceptionalism,” but she never gave the slightest clue what she meant by that — a return to President Bush’s policy of preventive and unnecessary war?
She and Mr. McCain both invoked the idea of “peace through strength,” but one of the few concrete proposals Mr. Romney has made — spending 4 percent of G.D.P. on defense — would weaken the economy severely. Mr. McCain was not telling the truth when he said Mr. Obama wants to cut another $500 billion from military spending. That amount was imposed by the Republicans as part of the extortion they demanded to raise the debt ceiling.
Ms. Rice said American allies need to know where the United States stands and that alliances are vitally important. But the truth is that Mr. Obama has repaired those alliances and restored allies’ confidence in America’s position after Mr. Bush and Ms. Rice spent years tearing them apart and ruining America’s reputation in the world.
The one alliance on which there is real debate between Mr. Romney and Mr. Obama is with Israel. But it is not, as Mr. Romney and his supporters want Americans to believe, about whether Mr. Obama is a supporter of Israel. Every modern president has been, including Mr. Obama. Apart from outsourcing his policy to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on settlements, it’s not clear what Mr. Romney would do differently.
But after watching the Republicans for three days in Florida, that comes as no surprise.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/31/o...?_r=1&nl=todaysheadlines&emc=edit_th_20120831
This was so much fun that I can hardly wait for the DNC to start. Should be interesting to see how they treat the truth.
Naming names or just spewing crap.There were even people on this forum who seemed to want Obama assassinated.
IOW, "we're going to lie as often, whenever, and about whatever we want to".Teddy - An article on Lyin Ryan.
Paul Ryan accused over errors and half-truths in Republican National Convention speech | World | News | National Post
Still, politicians and strategists have shown little regard for getting their facts wrong.
“Fact checkers come to this with their own sets of thoughts and beliefs, and we’re not going to let our campaign be dictated by fact checkers,” Romney pollster Neil Newhouse told Buzzfeed when asked about the widely-discredited welfare ad.
Sort of. All the jobs he's created were in his films.Romney did alright. Not sure how much energy will stick. The DNC is next week and they'll do their version of Hollywood.
On a side note, has anyone ever been to Carmel? There isn't a job in sight. Heck, their isn't a human in sight, or even a light, past about 7:30 pm. Clint Eastwood is hardly an expert in job creation.
lol Clint Eastwood comedy routine. Yawn
When is the election anyway?
lol A photo of the back of DOHbama's head is proof of the fact his head has a back side. Limbaugh sure likes to strrrrrrrrrrreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeetttttttcccccccccchhhhClint got under Obama's skin
I guess maybe. :lol:
Hollywood may be bashing Clint Eastwood's performance at the GOP convention, but Rush Limbaugh said Friday the reason is that he touched a nerve with leftist celebrities — and with the president himself.
Pointing to the photo the Obama camp tweeted after midnight showing the back of the president's head above the office chair in the Oval Office, Mr. Limbaugh said that proves the White House was worried. And he wondered whether it was Mr. Obama himself.
"It must have gotten to him because he tweeted at 12:30," Mr. Limbaugh said Friday on his radio program.
He also said the reason Hollywood types have panned the speech is because they couldn't find anything to shoot at in Mitt Romney's acceptance address, so they fired at whatever target they could find.
In his appearance just before Mr. Romney's formal acceptance speech Thursday night in Tampa, Mr. Eastwood held a mock conversation with the president, represented by an empty chair.
Limbaugh: Clint got under Obama's skin - Washington Times
... Everyone, including myself, has at one time or another misread a sentence from a teleprompter or from typed notes. And the liberal MSM and Obama's Chicago mafia will certainly make sure that everyone knows about Rubio's gaffe. But everyone knows exactly what he meant to say and why and many of us also know that he is an excellent speaker who has a reputation for wowing the crowds all over Florida and usually without the crutch of a teleprompter or even notes. The important thing is that taken as a whole the Rubio speech was first class and a fitting introduction of the party's new leader Mitt Romney.
- Eastwood is naturally a laconic, laid back guy and he is 82 years old and he was working without a script. Yes, he sometimes took awhile to get to the point and seemded to ramble a bit but he did get to the point several times as, for example, reminding people that the politicians are their employees and that Americans are part of an exceptional nation and that when someone can't do the job, especially the job of president, then it is time to cut him loose and that businessmen make better leaders of organizations than lawyers do and that Romney and Ryan are up to the job and deserving of the chance. Most of all, Clint delivered exactly what the GOP really wanted from him which was to ensure that millions of people who are not political junkies and are not strongly partisan would tune in to the networks at 10 o'clock just to see Dirty Harry the Hollywood legend ilive and in the flesh and most of these viewers would linger on after Eastwood finished his schtick and thereby hopefully get to know Romney a little more and be more inclinded to vote for him than they were before.
- For me, overall, it was a magnificent convention that faced squarely and demolished every one of the viscious fears and smears that the Donkey People - desperate to talk about anything but their dreadful record - have spent over a hundred million dollars in the past few months running TV commercials about.
- The phony War on Women was debunked by featuring women as at least half of the speakers on the first two nights and they were governors and congresswomen and others of real accomplishment with interesting personal stories to tell and persuasive reasons for being Republicans (the comments by the New Mexico governor were both effective and funny as she told about her and her husband as long time Democrats leaving a dinner with two senior Republicans and she leaning over to her husband and saying "You know, we're Republicans!"). Indeed, arguably the best and most thoughtful speech of the entire convention was delivered by a woman, Condi Rice, who didn't make Rubio's mistake because she was the only speaker there who didn't use a teleprompter and relied on her genius and a few brief points on a piece of paper.
- The bogus bull**** about the Republicans as racists and exclusionary was debunked because the majority of the speakers were women or blacks or latinos or a combination thereof and again these were not token Republicans but governors and senators and congressmen and other movers and shakers in the party. I particularly was impressed with Arturo Davis's speech directed towards independents and disaffected Democrats (as he was, having evolved from being dubbed the Alabama Obama and seconding Obama's nomination in 2008 to joining the GOP and campaiging for Romney in 2012).
- The blatant bullcrap about all business people and particularly venture capitalists and especially Romney being crooks and predators who were out to screw their customers and employees and everyone else and as quickly as possible was debunked last night by several speakers who had either worked with Mitt at Bain Capital or whose businesses were financed by Bain and who testified that Romney was far more than jut a financeer to them and their businesses and just the folks who spoke for Mitt last night on stage or on video represented successful companies employing some 200,000 jobs that would not exist today without Romney and Bain Capital.
- The Donkey People's downplaying and distorting of Romney's sterling record in rescuing the 2002 olympics and in turning around Taxachussetts was debunked by a line up of gold medal winning olympians and several of them knew Romney from 2002 and one of them even lived with the Romneys for awhile and all of them raved about his leadership in salvaging and making successful the 2002 olympics while his record as governor was extolled by the woman who served as his Lt. Governor and a black woman who served in his cabinet. The Lt. Governor praised Mitt's leadership in slaying the deficit, cutting taxes and encouraging job creation as governor and mentioned as an aside that Romney took no pay for his four years servfing his adopted state. (Can you imagine a Democrat, especially that cheap bastard Biden who usually gives .2% or less of his income to charity working as a governor or senator or anything else for nothing?) The black woman who served in Mitt's cabinet was especially compelling inasmuch as she declared herself to be both a life long liberal Democrat and a supporter of Romney both as governor and as candidate for president. She also noted that Romney was chosen in an independent study as being the top governor in the country in ensuring that women had access to top government positions. (If Romney is really engaged in war on women as repellent swine like Debbie Wassrerman Schultz contend, he is certainly losing the war.)
- Finally, the Democrats' dissembling and deceptions about Romney being a cold, unfeeling, selfish, uncaring, out of touch person who cannot relate to or want to help the average person were demolished by three non-political speakers who told of Mitt's really extraordinary compassion and support and friendship in very trying personal crisis. Perhaps the most poignant of these speakers were the elderly couple who told of how Mitt some thirty years ago befriended them and their 14 year old son who was dying of cancer, how he visited and comforted the kid in the hospital for many weeks and bought him a pricey fireworks display because the boy loved fireworks and he helped him with his will because the kid asked him to and then at the end he delivered the ulogy because the boy wanted Mitt to do so. There were many moist eyes in the audience before this story was finished!
- Bottom line, the GOP convention demolished the bankrupt Demcrats bogus bull**** about Romney and the GOP and the speeches landed some very heavy blows on Obama and the Donkey People and also laid a foundation for the battle of ideas that is still to come as Romney and Ryan with help from Rubio and Christie and others began to lay out an alternative vision for the country that will bemuch more appealing than the current situation of drift and despair not to mention the year end situation of falling off the economic and fiscal cliff. The Romney-Ryan ticket will lead and they will not avoid the major problems and they will focus on five priorities to restore business confidence and investment.
- As you have surmised, I am delighted with the way the GOP convention went and on the premis that Romney and Ryan win most of the debates and the recovery continues to be weak and a desperate Obama and his Chicago Mafia don't declare martial law and suspend the elections I hereby predict that the election is Romney`s to lose and that he might very well win very, very big.