"What is removed is usually blatantly inflammatory and companies wouldn't want to risk an uproar if it isn't."
So what happens if a gay or even non-gay gov't bureaucrat thinks that disagreeing with gay marriage is 'blatantly inflammatory'?
See where I'm going here?
I told this joke yesterday on the forum...
Did you hear about the native lady who drank too much Red Rose?
She drowned in her own tea-pee.
Is this humorous, or hateful? Who will decide this? Would it be okay for me to be fined for telling this joke?