Interesting to see people tripping over each other to be politically correct while jumping to conclusions simply over the title of a thread........Fascinating

"He feels very strongly that that should be something that's legal," Moriarty said. "He feels those relationship with his dogs are equivalent to a marriage-type relationship and that's not the case in Canada, thank goodness, and it can impact the welfare of the animals."
You just know he'd be such a dog around the ladies....As long as there is no offspring... A beagleman would just be wrong!
Big frackin deal. That makes just as much sense as comparing bestiality to hetero marriages, too. And in some cases I'm pretty sure some hetero marriages and bestial marriages would be pretty similar to each other. More so than homosexual marriages.The person screwing his dog made the point.. I just picked up on the comparison.. if you read the article..
He compared it to marriage, not gay marriage.The person screwing his dog made the point.. I just picked up on the comparison.. if you read the article..
Big frackin deal. That makes just as much sense as comparing bestiality to hetero marriages, too. And in some cases I'm pretty sure some hetero marriages and bestial marriages would be pretty similar to each other. More so than homosexual marriages.
Right.He compared it to marriage, not gay marriage.
Ok. I'll spell it out for you. Some hetero people are barely human.HUH? :banghead:
Ya think, Sherlock? Like the belief in gods and gremlins, for instance?I read somewhere that some idiosyncracies although abnormal in the individual are normal in the species!
.... all the while implying that there's something wrong with gay marriage. I got that part.Holly Sh!t!! The PC's here!!
I'm comparing it to the NEXT fight for legalization, and the last or in some states still being fought is same-sex-marriage.
So a guy, behind closed doors, loves his dogs, literally.
It's non of your business, and it doesn't effect you personally.
What's your problem?
I was the proud owner of a beautiful M'Lute Wolf cross, sled dog, because she said "NO, I will not team up.".Can a Dog say "yes" or "no" to the act?
It's not OK for me.I mean seriously, does anyone here really think that it's o.k. to have sex with your dog??
.... all the while implying that there's something wrong with gay marriage. I got that part.
The fact that in your title, you are equating sex with another consenting adult (regardless of gender) to sex with an unwilling, helpless member of another species pretty much dictates where your stance is on this "issue". That you seem to want to make light of it with the picture at the end, just reinforces it.
Cutteridge is a sick man. Zoophilia isn't quite as bad as pedophilia but it shares too many traits for me to think that it should ever be legalized. Conversely, homosexuality is a much different situation, which is much more similar to heterosexuality between adults than anything else (its really only SOME of the mechanics that differ). People that mock this type of situation are damned near as bad as the ones doing it, in my opinion too.
Childish comment.Jesus dude, pull your head out your ass and read my post at the top of this page!!!!
So now you say that this nutbar is the one equating gay marriage with bestial marriage. However, nothing in the article you posted compared gay marriage to bestialtiy nor did anything in the vid from the link you posted. But your thread title did. That means you imply the relationship between the two completely different issues.No I don't care about Gay Marriage, however this idiot did reference that bestiality was more normal that gay marriage and I referenced as the next legal battle for Canada.
I did.Draw you own bloody conclusions from their.
That's nice. Religions don't have a copyright on the term "marriage", though, so "gay marriage" is just as allowable as "gay civil union" or "hetero marriage". But that's a different issue.Personally, I think in both the USA & Canada gay marriage should be legal as far a civil unions done by the courts. I would not force a religious institution to preform the marriage unless that wanted too.