No, he hasn't. The court was too harsh on him. He doesn't deserve a jail sentence. It's time judges started showing a bit more common sense when handing down sentences.
Footballer Adam Johnson is NOT a paedophile and does NOT deserve prison
- Thread starter Blackleaf
- Start date
No, he hasn't. The court was too harsh on him. He doesn't deserve a jail sentence. It's time judges started showing a bit more common sense when handing down sentences.
You're talking through your hat again as usual Gerry. The topic is about PEDOPHILIA and even if a person has no problem fu cking a 15 year old (as you so delicately put it) he MAY be a scum bag, but if she's anatomically a WOMAN, the perpetrator is NOT a pedophile. That was my only point which YOU with all your wisdom and sagacity failed to pick up on.
As Gerry has probably already found out!
You're talking through your hat again as usual Gerry. The topic is about PEDOPHILIA and even if a person has no problem fu cking a 15 year old (as you so delicately put it) he MAY be a scum bag, but if she's anatomically a WOMAN, the perpetrator is NOT a pedophile. That was my only point which YOU with all your wisdom and sagacity failed to pick up on.
As Gerry has probably already found out!
You can come up with all the excuses in the world, it just shows what you really are.
You need help, Gerry, you're not playing with a full deck. I made a comment about people who are "involved" with 15 years, and like you usually do you had to personalize it. Time to get your mind out of the gutter!
You need help, Gerry, you're not playing with a full deck. I made a comment about people who are "involved" with 15 years, and like you usually do you had to personalize it. Time to get your mind out of the gutter!
There should be nobody 18 or older "involved" with any 15 year olds of either sex -- PERIOD. Pretty simple.
And what makes 18 sacred? Is this carved in stone somewhere? (Not to worry, Gerry, I'm not lusting)
Better questiopn is why doesn't blackie know the difference between football and soccer.
And what makes 18 sacred? Is this carved in stone somewhere? (Not to worry, Gerry, I'm not lusting)
18 is the age where a child is no considered an adult in a legal sense. But the real question is why is anybody older than 18 concerning themselves with somebody 15 (which is obviously IMHO well below this standard)? And why are you defending them?
Well, she was stalking him (which is surely a crime, yet no action has been taken against her) and she forced herself upon him.
Plus, it is possible for somebody over the age of 18 to be sexually attracted to somebody aged 15 or younger.
It's called statutory rape. The parents of the child should press charges and the guy needs to be in jail for taking advantage of a minor.
I'm sorry, but she's 15, a country deemed old enough in many - if not most - countries around the world to be able consent to sex.
Yet not Britain, Canada or the United States. And where did he do his child-rape?
Yes, but the laws in Britain and Canada and the US stink. 16 is too old to be the age of consent.
Let's face it, 15 year olds are very much physically and mentally prepared for sex. They are, biologically, prepared to have sex and reproduce at the age of 15. Yet we have laws in Britain, Canada and the US which says that they can't have sex at 15 and are not old enough to consent to sex. That's poppycock! If German and Italian and many other people around the world are deemed capable and mature enough to consent to sex at the age of 14 then it seems highly illogical that British, Canadian and American children AREN'T deemed capable of consenting to sex at that age even though, beyond almost no doubt, they are biologically prepared for sex at that age. Or is it the case that British, American and Canadian children's bodies and minds mature much slower than children in German and Italy and elsewhere? Nature intended people to be having sex by the age of 15.
Britain's age of consent should be reduced and Mr Johnson does not deserve a prison sentence. If anything, the girl should be in prison for stalking and underage drinking.
Had he chosen to take the road of a responsible adult and simply reported the 'stalking' to the police, that may be what happened. But he thought with his dick and got caught and justly imprisoned. But don't worry, I don't think they worry about consent laws in prison particularly with child molesters. I am sure he is enjoying plenty of sex at his new domicile. Justly deserved.