You got that right TS. Maybe these idiots should take a look at what "Nazi" looks like!
Charles Day Palmer's photographs reveal World War II horror | Daily Mail Online
Fed up with Neo Nazis Yet???
- Thread starter mentalfloss
- Start date
You got that right TS. Maybe these idiots should take a look at what "Nazi" looks like!
Charles Day Palmer's photographs reveal World War II horror | Daily Mail Online
Some background on Trump's head Nazi...
In college, Trump aide Stephen Miller led controversial 'Terrorism Awareness Project' warning of 'Islamofascism'
(CNN)White House senior policy adviser Stephen Miller has garnered attention in recent weeks as one of the chief architects behind President Donald Trump's executive order temporarily banning travel from seven Muslim-majority countries.
The 31-year-old aide's hardline views on Islam and terrorism took shape while he was still a student at Duke University. It was there, in the 2007 spring semester of his senior year, that Miller helped launch and run the "Terrorism Awareness Project," an initiative, Miller wrote at the time, that was aimed at educating students about the risk of "Islamofascism."
A CNN KFile review of Miller's comments on TV and on his blog for the project, which is available on the Web archive, reveal Miller's belief that the US and western civilization are at war with Islamic jihadists. Miller did not respond to multiple requests for comment from CNN's KFile for this story.
In college, Trump aide Stephen Miller led 'Terrorism Awareness Project' warning of 'Islamofascism' - CNNPolitics.com
In college, Trump aide Stephen Miller led controversial 'Terrorism Awareness Project' warning of 'Islamofascism'
(CNN)White House senior policy adviser Stephen Miller has garnered attention in recent weeks as one of the chief architects behind President Donald Trump's executive order temporarily banning travel from seven Muslim-majority countries.
The 31-year-old aide's hardline views on Islam and terrorism took shape while he was still a student at Duke University. It was there, in the 2007 spring semester of his senior year, that Miller helped launch and run the "Terrorism Awareness Project," an initiative, Miller wrote at the time, that was aimed at educating students about the risk of "Islamofascism."
A CNN KFile review of Miller's comments on TV and on his blog for the project, which is available on the Web archive, reveal Miller's belief that the US and western civilization are at war with Islamic jihadists. Miller did not respond to multiple requests for comment from CNN's KFile for this story.
In college, Trump aide Stephen Miller led 'Terrorism Awareness Project' warning of 'Islamofascism' - CNNPolitics.com
ON the topic of ISIS and the 60,000 who have been killed fighting for ISIS, here is another perspective:
These countries have a standing army less than 60,000...
Active Military Manpower by Country
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_number_of_military_and_paramilitary_personnel
ISIS isn't even a country... If you aren't afraid of ISIS itself, the mechanics and rate behind their growth should show you that things can escalate fast...
Their standing army was larger than the standing armies of countries such as, Australia, Portugal, Neatherlands, etc...
While even being outnumbered by the Iraqi army more than 2 to 1 they practically wiped the **** out of the Iraqi army and had it not been for outside interferance the Iraqi army would have been soundly defeated in all its attempts to dislodge ISIS from its soil.
This should show you that an organization such as ISIS, is more potent than people like to give it credit for.
These countries have a standing army less than 60,000...
Active Military Manpower by Country
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_number_of_military_and_paramilitary_personnel
ISIS isn't even a country... If you aren't afraid of ISIS itself, the mechanics and rate behind their growth should show you that things can escalate fast...
Their standing army was larger than the standing armies of countries such as, Australia, Portugal, Neatherlands, etc...
While even being outnumbered by the Iraqi army more than 2 to 1 they practically wiped the **** out of the Iraqi army and had it not been for outside interferance the Iraqi army would have been soundly defeated in all its attempts to dislodge ISIS from its soil.
This should show you that an organization such as ISIS, is more potent than people like to give it credit for.
Wow.
The idiot Trump has an advisor that actually knows what he is talking about.
Who would have guessed?
We have been at war with Islam since before the Battle of Tours, during which Charles (the Hammer) Martel saved Christendom. That was in the year 732.
Read a little history.
ROFLMFAO AGAIN. You do come up with the stupid ones.
They must be Muslims since they seem to hate Jews.Is that your hood?
You ever found a reliable source or do you only quote ones that share your outlandish views?
Last year more than 10,000 Americans were killed in criminal homicides by other Americans.
How many were killed by Islamic terrorists?
How many were killed by Islamic terrorists?
Hysteria - one might call it.. a phobia....
Andrew Coyne: Hysteria from Conservatives over harmless motion on Islamophobia
Conservatism used to have some claim to being a coherent political philosophy. Of late it has become a series of dares. The most extreme voice will lay down the most extreme position, then challenge others to endorse it.
As often as not this has nothing to do with conservatism. It is rather a kind of moral exhibitionism, populist virtue-signalling, in which the object is to say and do the most intolerant or ill-considered thing that comes to mind — anything that might attract the condemnation of bien-pensants in the media and elsewhere, whose opposition becomes proof in itself of its merits.
The willingness to court such controversy in turn becomes the test of political purity. To demur, conversely, can only be a sign of cowardice, or worse, liberalism, a heresy that that would seem to have overcome much of the conservative movement, to judge by the ever-lengthening list of the excommunicated.
So we come to the latest of these blooding exercises, the “debate” over Motion 103, a private member’s motion introduced by Liberal MP Iqra Khalid. In the fevered imaginings of its online discussants, #M103 is decried as a bill that would forbid any criticism of Islam, if not the first step towards imposing Sharia law. I only wish I were exaggerating.
This hysteria campaign has been whipped up by exactly the people you’d expect, and pandered to by people of whom you might have expected better, including several Conservative leadership candidates. Pierre Lemieux has denounced it as “an attack on free speech.” Maxime Bernier asks whether “it is a first step towards restricting our right to criticize Islam.” Lisa Raitt, Andrew Scheer, and Erin O’Toole have all come out against it, while Kellie Leitch, bless her heart, has set up a petition to “Stop Motion 103,” complete with a blue-eyed model with a gag over her mouth.
The only candidate to say he will vote in favour of the motion is Michael Chong. For this he has been excoriated as a sellout; it rather confirms him as a man of judgment and conscience. There is simply no reasonable construction of the motion that can support the claims made of it. It is not a bill, for starters: it is a simple motion, an expression of opinion, of no legal force or effect. It does not call for any ban or restriction on speech of any kind.
It merely asks the government to “recognize the need to quell the increasing public climate of hate and fear,” condemns “Islamophobia and all forms of systemic racism and religious discrimination,” and instructs a committee of Parliament to study the matter. Yes, the motion is clumsily worded, and yes, it specifically mentions “Islamophobia.”
But the notion that this amounts to “singling out” one religion for “special privileges,” as some have claimed, is specious.
Yes, of course, all religious groups should be free of discrimination and hatred. But it does no disservice to the others to pay particular attention to one, at a time when that group is particularly exposed to both. After the slaughter of six Muslims at prayer in Quebec City, people of goodwill, not to say common sense, would understand why it might be timely for all of us to offer some assurance to members of that community.
It is, at the same time, understandable why there would be some nervousness around this subject. There is a certain school of Islam that would indeed place severe legal constraints on the right to criticize or ridicule the faith, just as there are lots of people, especially on the left, who would eagerly censor all sorts of “insensitive” speech.
This is what makes these issues so maddeningly elusive of resolution: it is not one thing or the other, but both at the same time. We live in a time both of much more widespread and open expressions of racism — thanks, internet — and of acute hypersensitivity to rude or even frank speech of all kinds. Each feeds off the other. But the alternative to “political correctness” is not bigotry and intolerance, and the answer to racism is not censorship. Indeed, we have too much of that already.
Andrew Coyne: Hysteria from Conservatives over harmless motion on Islamophobia
Even in your article the author admits that the motion is clumsily worded. The opposition asked that "Islamophobia" be removed and replaced with "condemn all forms of systemic racism, religious intolerance and discrimination of Muslims, Jews, Christians, Sikhs, Hindus, and other religious communities".
That sounds like a fair compromise to me, especially if you want equality for all religions.
The compromise would eliminate the clumsy wording and as a result the motions purpose would be clear and we can get about combating bigotry to the fullest.
Liberal MP won't remove Islamophobia reference from motion condemning discrimination - Politics - CBC News
That sounds like a fair compromise to me, especially if you want equality for all religions.
The compromise would eliminate the clumsy wording and as a result the motions purpose would be clear and we can get about combating bigotry to the fullest.
Liberal MP won't remove Islamophobia reference from motion condemning discrimination - Politics - CBC News
It's a perfectly credible motion as evidenced that it is driving you bat **** insane.
Bill Maher to Interview Alt-Right Neo Nazi Milo Yiannopoulos on 'Real Time'
Bill Maher to Interview Alt-Right Neo Nazi Milo Yiannopoulos on 'Real Time'
That's not the point. If you had to choose being being murdered by your compatriot and being murdered by a foreigner, would you not prefer that your murderer be your compatriot?
Yes of course it is, because only a cynical person would question a poorly written motion that was hastily written.
A perfectly reasonable compromise was offered but was rejected.
Pakistan now....
ISIS claims responsibility for Pakistani shrine attack - World - CBC News
You dont have that many people die for your cause without having the word, "prevalent" used to describe your organization...