What are you talking about? You use some of the flimsiest places to gather news, as have been consistently proven wrong, time and time again.The Guardian is far more credible than 99% of American sources. But just to make it plain to anyone reading this string that you are a hypocrite, lets take a look at the credibility of sources you didn't question:
As objective as you.Does she sound objective to you?
You would know, you would have one of the most notorious at CC.Sound like an agenda to me.
History doesn't make it unbiased.I suggest you educate yourself about The Guardian's long history (est. 1791).
History of the Observer | GNM archive | guardian.co.uk
Looking in the mirror are we?Your comment regarding The Guardian's objectiveness in the context of all the other crap you accept at face value makes you look like an hypocritical idiot.
Remember when you challenged me to read and disprove the Goldstone report?
I'm still waiting for you to acknowledge I provided substantial evidence throwing a shadow on it.
To bad their fellow Muslim neighbours weren't...When this ethnic cleansing war started back in 1947, most Palestinians were unarmed peasants.
God forbid you recognize historical fact.
Unlike your pro Palestinian sources right?I suggest you start reading The Guardian for balance, as you obviously know little more about this conflict that what you've been told by pro-Israel propaganda sources.
And again, you only afford jurisprudence to the side you support.Regarding the massacre:
Here is first hand testimony from a survivor:
LiveLeak.com - 13Yr Old al Samouni Survivor of Israeli War Crime Testimony
And yet the ICC has dismissed all claims. Go figure, even when jurisprudence dictates your stories are BS, you still can't afford Israel any respect.Not only did the IDF herd about 80 civilians into a single home before shelling it, killing most of the occupants inside, they alos block ambulances from evacualting the wounded for 4 days... acording to the International Committee of the Red Cross/Crescent:
And never heard before the ICC.This war crime and many others just like it were independently reported by Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch:
He didn't say he didn't believe Israel hasn't committed war crimes. He said you have an agenda. One so strong that you ignore reality to keep it going.Instead of condemning Israeli war crimes, you choose not to believe them and instead blame the victims.
I'd have another heart attack if you were for once.Why don't you be honest for a change.
You support neo Nazi war criminals and believe anything that paints Israel as bad. No matter the incontrovertible evidence placed before you.We both know Israel isn't finished taking more land and property from these people. We both know Israel's leaders will commit as many war crimes as they have to to take the land God gave to Jews. You support Israeli war criminals and oppose Palestinian ones. I oppose the war criminals on both sides and support innocent people on both sides who just want to live in peace.
The only hypocrite I see here, if you.