Obama = highest corporate profits since 1900
You're confusing corporate profits with Corporate Welfare..
Besides, corporate profits tanked to the bottom during Obama presidency, where else can they go after they hit rock bottom.
Obama = highest corporate profits since 1900
I don't think any of our presidents wined and dined them with the type of fanfare Ford used for the genocidal Suharto or Reagan did for Rios-Montt.
Except Carter had the country's fiscal shape in order. When Reagan started running up debt I remember Carter warning about the long term implications. Welcome to the long term implications.![]()
Now that Obama is President... LOL
After you read his writings you'll realize he was a very bright man.
When? 1945 and 1953, as soon as hostilities ceased?
Only one candidate, Romney, competed against BHO.Probably because odds are that he/she will be crooked and incompetent. Look at the pi$$ poor candidates and wingnuts they had to compete with Obama.
That means that for 10 years after hostilities ceased the US kept 1000's of troops in Japan and US troops are still there.![]()
Japan returned to sovereign self government in 1955,Walt
Only one candidate, Romney, competed against BHO.
That means that for 10 years after hostilities ceased the US kept 1000's of troops in Japan and US troops are still there.
Had the GOP chosen a conservative, such as Palin, they would have easily won. Romney was too progressive and not aggressive. Also the GOP establishment didn't want to be seen chastising a "black" man for his incompetence.My point exactly. Of all the bad potentials they had to pick the worst one. Possibly second worst if you consider Palin as a contender.
It is likr the republicans wanted to loose.
Had the GOP chosen a conservative, such as Palin, they would have easily won. Romney was too progressive and not aggressive. Also the GOP establishment didn't want to be seen chastising a "black" man for his incompetence.
Had the GOP chosen a conservative, such as Palin, they would have easily won. Romney was too progressive and not aggressive. Also the GOP establishment didn't want to be seen chastising a "black" man for his incompetence.
You forgot to whimper about how Obama isn't a citizen.Had the GOP chosen a conservative, such as Palin, they would have easily won. Romney was too progressive and not aggressive. Also the GOP establishment didn't want to be seen chastising a "black" man for his incompetence.
And that's certainly grounds for impeachment.I understand that the POTUS is quite an accomplished golfer
And that's certainly grounds for impeachment.
And that's certainly grounds for impeachment.
I'm sure he'll release his handicap to show how brilliant he is as soon as he releases his school records to show how brilliant he is.I understand that the POTUS is quite an accomplished golfer
Libya, Yemen, Syria, Egypt... None having anything to do with BHO of course.Interesting. I don't profess to know anything about American politics, but it seems that if a president doesn't start any new wars, or bomb anybody new, he is obviously a poor choice for president. Carter was obviously a loser.....so too is Obama. GW Bush could have been great, if only he wasn't so stupid.
What about his real, Kenyan birth certificate, Walmart?I'm sure he'll release his handicap to show how brilliant he is as soon as he releases his school records to show how brilliant he is.