European Parliament to vote on reviving 'dirty' label for oilsands

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,817
471
83
European Parliament to vote on reviving 'dirty' label for oilsands

Like a movie monster from the black bog, a European Union directive that would stigmatize "dirty" imports of Canadian bitumen refuses to die.

A vote Tuesday in the European Parliament could reject a compromise draft bill and revive tough fuel quality directive labelling that would target unconventional crude, specifically Alberta's oilsands.

The vote of the full plenary was prompted earlier this month when the European Parliament's environment committee flatly rejected a deal worked out after more than two years of lobbying by Canada.

Natural Resources Minister Greg Rickford and International Trade Minister Ed Fast met last week with 25 European Union representatives in advance of the vote.

"He reiterated Canada's position that any measure that provides separate, more onerous treatment for oilsands crude relative to other crude with similar or higher (greenhouse gas) emission intensities is discriminatory and adverse to the FQD's intent," Chris McCluskey, Rickford's spokesman, said in a release.

Under European emissions rules, that dirty oil designation would make Canadian oilsands imports deeply unattractive to Europe's refineries.

"EU legislation requires a reduction of the greenhouse gas intensity of the fuels used in vehicles by six per cent by 2020," using 2010 as a baseline, says the European Commission web site.

http://www.cbc.ca/m/news/politics/e...n-reviving-dirty-label-for-oilsands-1.2874090
 

Goober

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 23, 2009
24,691
116
63
Moving
Read this.
BBC News - Inside Europe Blog
The EU may scrap plans for legislation on air pollution and waste in a drive to boost the economy, according to a leaked document seen by BBC News.

In its draft workplan, the European Commission says the priorities are creating jobs, reducing public debt and increasing industrial competitiveness.
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,817
471
83
They'll probably call it dirty oil again.

Shouldn't they be called tar sands anyway?
 

Goober

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 23, 2009
24,691
116
63
Moving
Not so much anymore.

They will be importing US - Canadian shale gas in the next few years. The US - Canada has more than enough supply to satisfy all their energy needs. And from a reliable and stable source.
We just need more pipelines as the BC LNG projects are tentative at the best.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
118,605
14,561
113
Low Earth Orbit
yabut, yabut, yabut - they would never, ever stoop to using 'dirty' oil?... Would they?

There are several ssources.

 

captain morgan

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 28, 2009
28,429
148
63
A Mouse Once Bit My Sister
Hopefully they will!


That leaves them the wonderful opportunity to negotiate with the Russian producers.... Hasn't worked out to well in the past, only one or 2 invasions of neighbouring countries, but hey, maybe it's different this time, right?

There are several ssources.


Well, there's a problem with the oil from North and South America.... Dirty oil from Canada... Yankee oil from the USA (the EU is all snotty towards the Americans) and the Orinoco basin is dirty oil too.

Those po folks just don't have any real options I guess
 

taxslave

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 25, 2008
36,362
4,340
113
Vancouver Island
They'll probably call it dirty oil again.

Shouldn't they be called tar sands anyway?

Maybe if it was actually tar. But it is not.So no it should not be called tarsands.
In any event even EU member countries don't care much what the EU says so why should we? If they don't like our oil they can always wait until the commies overrun Europe and then they can have whatever oil putin decides to give them.