you didn't say anything of substance so there isn't any possible way you could have won anything...
good effort, actually not really.
Yes, when
you have failed, tell your opponent he did. Excellent tactic cubby.
I have sufficiently proven, that Ahmadinejad has called for Israel's destruction. You can keep ignoring the elephant in the room if you want though.
It only proves my point about the difference between legitimate criticism of Israel, and the demonization and de-legitimization thereof.
What?
no, it's fulled with verified facts.
Being fairly aware of your severe dysfunction and obviously inadequate English reading and writing skills, I'll assume that was meant to say "filled". If it was filled with verifiable facts. I wouldn't have been able to tear it apart, like I did. No to mention, if those facts were so easily verifiable. Instead of hijacking my smilies, you would have actually posted some of those verifiable facts to disprove my rebuttal.
Since all you did was, well, nothing, except post some opinion from wikiality and some silly straw man about discrimination in the West. You've simply proven that your comment "verifiable facts", is well, wrong.
Good call. Thanx for coming out cubby.
Yes, who doesn't know this besides brainless redneck dopes??
Your article for one, it can't seem to be consistent and decide who is to blame.
No , they're "so-called moderate" , but in reality they aren't very moderate at all. It sounds like you support American imperialism and oppressing citizens of other foreign countires...
Not at all. If one was educated or intelligent enough to do even the most cursory research, they would already know where "I" stand on American interference and foreign policy. But thanx for showing us you haven't the education, nor intellect to grasp the point.
Yea, this is hilarious, why would we support and help those dirty arab monkeys? HAHAHAHHAHA!
Can you name me one Arab neighbour of Israel that has a gay rights legislation, written into the human rights legislation of their very charter of rights and freedoms?
I should have skimmed over your worthless replies for intelligent content before wasting my time replying to it.. I'll be sure to do this in the future...
And that would be a change how?
.
Given it's the closest thing to a fact that has ever graced your posts, since it was contained in an article you posted, you get the credit. But I'm being generous.
Well at least you didn't embarrass yourself trying to post some other easily torn apart rage of an article. That smilie hijack is likely the safest thing you could do, when faced with something you can't understand.
I use it because someone posts something stupid, or funny. In your case the former, oft.
How you used it, is a cop out. You obviously haven't the maturity or intellect to grasp what was said in that quotation, and the only thing you could do was either ignore it. Which I would catch. Or mock it, which is what you chose.
Sadly.
but when Iran does it, its violating the freedoms of its citizens.
Ummm, you really should try a remedial reading comprehension class, or course.
You just compared 1947 Israel to contemporary Iran. Comparing Israeli protection of State secrets, to the deliberate oppression of open and uncensored communication about anything?
Quite.
Cool, anymore horribly inaccurate statistics you want to post?
Your article had none. I provided some. You deem them inaccurate, please provide some of your own, or something that says something to the contrary...
That's how this works cubby.
Nevertheless, JNF land policy has been criticized as discrimination.
[172] When the
Israel Land Administration leased JNF land to Arabs, it took control of the land in question and compensated the JNF with an equivalent amount of land in areas not designated for development (generally in the
Galilee and the
Negev), thus ensuring that the total amount of land owned by the JNF remains the same.
[173][175]
Ya, I said that. The only difference is, I didn't steal my data from a member contributed wikiality, fail to give it proper accreditation and post an
opinion as if it were
fact. Again showing your limited research and investigatory skills.
Even if wikiality was an acceptable source, you failed to say anything I didn't, other then add somebody else's opinion of the JNL and ILA.
Learn English, this gibberish is barely decipherable.
Nice cop out when you can't refute the comment. Or maybe the grammar and writing style was actually well beyond your education level. Thus rendering it incomprehensible to someone of such limited and stunted comprehension skills, such as yourself.
But being a stickler for key words, as I am. I noted you used the word "Barely". Regardless of the fact that my writing skills are beyond your capacity. That would denote that you were able to "decipher" what I wrote. And yet you still couldn't refute it. Now that is funny!
Blacks and Hispanics hold government jobs, serve in the military, hold elected positions etc,, here in the west... this clearly means we're a equitable paradise where no discrimination happens....
That would be a great comparison, if that is what your article was alluding to. But it wasn't. Your article was alluding to "oppression", not discrimination. Two completely different things, especially when you add your disingenuous comparison to the West.
That's what happens when
you operate in the realm of strawman arguments and half truths cubby.
You eventually believe the lines you blur. Your posts are a shining example of that.
Two State Hypocrisy
Daniel McGowan
Professor Emeritus
Even if I were to take apart the glaring errors and half truths contained in that Op/Ed piece. Why would I take a Liberal Arts Professor seriously, on the subject of Israel?
Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is to sell his 33-year-old car to raise money for a charity that funds housing projects for young people.
BBC News - Iran's president to sell old car for charity
Your point?
