Earth Day Aprill 22, 2015

taxslave

taxslave

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 25, 2008
36,362
4,340
113
Vancouver Island
waldo said:
obviously you don't anything about the IPCC report process. Full peer-review is reflected within the physical science and technical based reports. So-called 'gray matter' sources are accepted in other reports, most notably reports aligned with the so-called social sciences - the IPCC has had this fully documented from day 1, stating exactly how and when these types of sources are utilized... and, of course, they're fully identified as such. That error you pumped forward with... that was one of those 'gray matter' sources in a social-science focused sub-report.

but of course, being the blustering blowhard denier that you are... you haven't a clue!
Click to expand...

Peer reviewed meaning another couple of believers agree with every statement one believer makes. Typical cult programing.
 
DaSleeper

DaSleeper

Trolling Hypocrites
May 27, 2007
33,676
1,666
113
Northern Ontario,
Weirdo Says............................




But he's sh*t out of luck........lol
 
waldo

waldo

House Member
Oct 19, 2009
3,042
0
36
captain morgan said:
Run away weirdo, but bear in mind, you can't run from yourself, your disease and the fact that your Messiah has lied to you all these years.

Denying this reality will only perpetuate this immense angst that you obviously have such a great problem with
Click to expand...

no worries capstain! You keep your denying, you keep purposely conflating lie and error, you keep putting up your nothing statements and your unsubstantiated denier claims... you keep screeching those denier talking points and you keep holding to your very special self-serving and agenda driven "denier facts"! :mrgreen:
 
waldo

waldo

House Member
Oct 19, 2009
3,042
0
36
petros said:
97% of 33%....
Click to expand...

petros dance! You've been shown exactly how the consensus was arrived at... whether 75, 85, 90... or 97%! There is none of your "of 33%" BS!

captain morgan said:
Did some people attempt an intervention with you today?

That's where you had to go, right?
Click to expand...

capstain! Why are you just so confrontational... do I validate your presence here? :mrgreen:
 
waldo

waldo

House Member
Oct 19, 2009
3,042
0
36
taxslave said:
Peer reviewed meaning another couple of believers agree with every statement one believer makes. Typical cult programing.
Click to expand...

it's quite heeelarious to read deniers so coveting the peer-review label when a piece of denier schlock gets published! Denier's will so pump it up and loudly proclaim... it's peer reviewed!!! Of course, the problem for deniers is that invariably, if the "skeptic" paper actually even warrants a response from legitimate scientists, that so coveted denier trumped paper will suffer the stings and critical review of PEER RESPONSE! See lil' denier taxi... it's a 2-fold process... review and response! :mrgreen:

petros said:
Are you a gambling man?
Click to expand...

are you a dancing man?

DaSleeper said:
Weirdo Says............................

But he's sh*t out of luck........lol
Click to expand...

get over it! Take your waldo whoopin' like the trolling lapdog you are! :mrgreen:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom