But you do of course realize, don't you, that there are more prosaic explanations for the epiphany you described than the one you've chosen to give it?
Well Dex as long as you believe what I said happened is the actual way it happened I don't care what label you apply to it.
Your post just before this one would lead me to believe pray would be pretty much useless to you at any time but at the same time there are words to the effect that you will still be counted, or at least be given the opportunity, to reverse that position. That sort of puts your view about God into conflict with the words you have used so far to describe Him.
Now I would certainly say that if we put somebody in the grave we are guilty of a sin that we cannot undo. Is that the case with God, He can bring somebody back from the grave. Now if that person was sent to the fiery Lake then they could not be brought back from there, ever.
Your lack of understanding about what (and why) took place back in the OT was only to show (that would include those who only read about those events) that what God determines will be done actually gets done, and on schedule if one is provided.
Your sorrow for those who were killed is justified because you have a verse handy that says none of those lives will ever be restored. This verse below would seem to say that everybody who dies, good or bad, has their breath of life return to God, the very same place it came from in the first place.
Ec:3:20:
All go unto one place;
all are of the dust,
and all turn to dust again.
Ec:12:7:
Then shall the dust return to the earth as it was:
and the spirit shall return unto God who gave it.
hehe
And don't forget that according to the Bible, this god, his son, and the spook are one in the same. This is one of the reasons I am as close to being positive as one can get without actual proof that it was a bunch of relatively unintelligent, neurotic people that invented this god; because it is relatively unintelligent and neurotic.
That is what happens when you start to believe men over believing what the Bible actually says. You blindly assume such a theory is true but you can't find it anyplace in the Book. If it is in the Bible then what verse actually says that? There are hundreds of verses that point to God and Christ being separate.
If a verse like this doesn't clear that issue up what hope is there that you will understand the more difficult parts?
Joh:20:17:
Jesus saith unto her,
Touch me not;
for I am not yet ascended to my Father:
but go to my brethren,
and say unto them,
I ascend unto my Father,
and your Father;
and to my God,
and your God.
Now L I'm not how old you are but Dex has some gray in his whiskers so he should have some knowledge but in this area these verses would seem to cover his actual knowledge and not his own conceived notion about how much he actually knows about what is written about God, Christ and the Holy Spirit. (let alone why some events took place at all)
1Co:3:2:
I have fed you with milk,
and not with meat:
for hitherto ye were not able to bear it,
neither yet now are ye able.
Heb:5:12:
For when for the time ye ought to be teachers,
ye have need that one teach you again which be the first principles of the oracles of God;
and are become such as have need of milk,
and not of strong meat.
Heb:5:13:
For every one that useth milk is unskilful in the word of righteousness:
for he is a babe.
1Pe:2:2:
As newborn babes,
desire the sincere milk of the word,
that ye may grow thereby: