THAT is giving benefit of the doubt?? I don't think you quite understand the phrase.
There is a huge gray area between indications of certain desires and actual violation of the law.
I promise you, my brother would report actual exploitation of a child in a heartbeat.
And the anecdote is true.
And you should have some basis before you suggest that someone is a liar.
Actually I DIDN'T call your brother a liar. I said you were full of BS because if what you said was true then - to be blunt - your brother likes checking out porn sites of men and kids, or it never happened. If you brother has seen such things and reported it, then good, but he really should stop going to such sites.
And yeah, that is me giving you the benefit of the doubt. If I wrote what I felt, I WOULD have called you a liar, like Gerryh did. Instead I'd rather just assume you made the story up to try and prove your point.
From your link:
HUH???????? I'm sorry, sexual abuse of a male by a male IS homosexuality
From that link
"Offenders are most commonly heterosexual men, even if the victim is a boy."
Once again, male on male IS homosexuality.
In fact, each of your links depends on that same illogical explanation of adult male to male child sexual exploitation...........
So much for that!!!
[/FONT][/FONT]
Uh, WRONG. Male on male child exploitation is NOT homosexual and, as Gerryh mentioned, most men in these cases ARE attracted to adult women. Hell, some of them are even MARRIED with kids of their own. So really what's your excuse and your outrage for those people?
Adult on child abuse is not about sex, it's about POWER. Some prefer the power over girl children, some prefer it over boy children, and some just don't care, a child is a child that they can control, they can own, possess, etc.
Those links don't negate my point that ANY adult, be they heterosexual OR homosexual, that abuses a child makes them a PEDOPHILE. To me, THAT is their "sex" and in either case it's wrong, evil, vile, etc. These people - men and women both - are not straight, they're not gay, they're pedophiles.
As you said, "So much for that!!"
That's right. Which homosexuality is, lol.
Yes it is. Even the studies you would forward about monkey's, sheep and whatnot, say the same thing.
Even geneticists studying the genetic aspects of call it an anomaly.
Even those that claim it's caused by nurture, call it an anomaly.
It is out of step with the natural process of procreation in all species, except asexual, and is anomalous. Ergo unnatural.
Bonobos.
Sorry Bear but Bonobos actually disprove your claim. Bonobos partake in not just homosexuality but are in essence bisexual. They'll get together with anyone for pleasure, for stress, to settle arguments. It's all natural. Not an anomaly, it's not unnatural, it's how they live. Homosexuality does have a purpose, we're only just seeing/looking for it because it's only recently people actually gave a crap enough to want to look for it. Same with why "suddenly" so many people seem gay; it's not a sudden thing but rather the time has made it more likely that being gay isn't the death sentence in some places it was.
