Implosion? Their results have yet to be overturned and they were vindicated by repeated investigations.
Death knell for AGW
- Thread starter Walter
- Start date
Implosion? Their results have yet to be overturned and they were vindicated by repeated investigations.
P.S. Why does the timeline of pole movement perfectly overlap with the temperature rises? The biggest leaps in pole movement, perfectly fit the biggest jumps in temperature.
WHY?
To ignore the most dramatic change to the most powerful system earth has to offer is a result of retardation of epic magnitude or psychic hypoxia from too much CO2 on the mind.
Well, which gas excited and heated by solar radiation produces your favourite aurora displays?
O2 or N?
Debunk me!
Last edited:
Probably just a wee coincidence.... Maybe it's time to change the name from Climate Change to Anthropogenic Pole Migration Thingy
The admission of fraud was in the many emails
It doesn't. There's a significant lag. It's clear in geologic samples, which are obviously much slower and longer than the current changes we're witnessing.
I see you ignored the evidence you asked for. Historical climate of the Quaternary shows low geomagnetism, coincides with cold and dry climates. That is the opposite of what is occurring now.
I don't have to, the answer you asked for, and that I linked to does. Try reading the manual before calling tech support.
Debunked?
What year did AGW start? What year did pole movement start?
50% of movement has been the period from 1972 to 2001
When did AGW allegedly start to heat things up? Early-mid 1970s?
YES or NO?
Try commenting again that there is no match to the timeline of movement.
NO MATCH???
Debunk me!
INteresting quesitons. UNfortuantely, your model fails to account for rising CO2 concentrations. If they aren't coming from anthropogenic sources, then what is driving them up? It's find to offer alternate conjectures, but to make it a theory you need to develop the full model.
Now the polar bears are obese and blind.
CO2 is not an issue AT FVCKING ALL! Non, zero, nada, kaput, zip zant doodly squat, sweet fvck all NO!
Can you charge a consumption tax on geomagnetic polar movement and the climate and weather changes it delivers to fund natural gas development and it's infrastructure like you can with CO2?
Last edited:
Tornado spike in 2011 attributed to climate change. So what to make of this year’s tornado drought?
Tornado spike in 2011 attributed to climate change. So what to make of this year’s tornado drought? | SciGuy | a Chron.com blog
Tornado spike in 2011 attributed to climate change. So what to make of this year’s tornado drought? | SciGuy | a Chron.com blog
2011 T-Storm season wasn't linked to climate change. It was linked to the Pacific Oscillation but that doesn't fit with the lie.
That's a good article. I'm kind of surprised to see a couple of the boards AGW deniers don't have beefs with it. It's mainstream stuff.
I take it you're not a fan of Grenhouse Gas Theory in general then? The idea of CO2 molecules abosrbing light of certian wavelengths and re-emittin git?
Monckton challenges the IPCC – suggests fraud – and gets a response
The IPCC fraud case (but not the planet) hots up
Guest essay by Christopher Monckton of Brenchley
Two weeks ago I reported the central error in the IPCC’s Fourth Assessment Report (2007) to its secretariat. After the contributing scientists had submitted their final draft report, the bureaucrats and politicians had tampered with the HadCRUt3 graph of global instrumental temperatures since 1850 by adding four trend-lines to the anomaly curve and drawing from their relative slopes the unjustifiable and statistically indefensible conclusion, stated twice in the published report, that global warming was “accelerating” and that the “acceleration” was our fault.
Global warming is not accelerating. The planet is not hotting up. There has been no warming for 17 years on any measure, as the IPCC’s climate-science chairman now admits. That includes the Hadley/CRU data. There has been no warming for 23 years according to RSS satellite dataset.
more
Monckton challenges the IPCC – suggests fraud – and gets a response | Watts Up With That?
The IPCC fraud case (but not the planet) hots up
Guest essay by Christopher Monckton of Brenchley
Two weeks ago I reported the central error in the IPCC’s Fourth Assessment Report (2007) to its secretariat. After the contributing scientists had submitted their final draft report, the bureaucrats and politicians had tampered with the HadCRUt3 graph of global instrumental temperatures since 1850 by adding four trend-lines to the anomaly curve and drawing from their relative slopes the unjustifiable and statistically indefensible conclusion, stated twice in the published report, that global warming was “accelerating” and that the “acceleration” was our fault.
Global warming is not accelerating. The planet is not hotting up. There has been no warming for 17 years on any measure, as the IPCC’s climate-science chairman now admits. That includes the Hadley/CRU data. There has been no warming for 23 years according to RSS satellite dataset.
more
Monckton challenges the IPCC – suggests fraud – and gets a response | Watts Up With That?