https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7045880/
If you want to know something about the covid genome read this over.
The article that my medical journalist friend (Rosemary Frei) co-wrote doesn't seem to think that's enough to warrant being sure that Cov 2 exists. I've looked at a few comments from people who have actually read her article (something I'm not sure anyone here has done yet) and the comment that sticks out the most for me is this one:
**
The limitations of Koch’s criteria are even more obvious when we consider viral diseases, which were not yet discovered when the postulates were formulated. Thomas Rivers, who has been called the ‘father of modern virology’, wrote:
‘‘It is unfortunate that so many workers blindly followed the rules, because Koch himself quickly realized that in certain instances all the conditions could not be met. . . . Thus, in regard to certain diseases, particularly those caused by viruses, the blind adherence to Koch’s postulates may act as a hindrance instead of an aid.’’
Many viruses do not cause illness in all infected individuals, a requirement of postulate #1. An example is poliovirus, which causes paralytic disease in about 1% of those infected. Further compromising postulate #1 is the fact that infection with the same virus may lead to markedly different diseases, while different viruses may cause the same disease. Postulates #2 and #3 cannot be fulfilled for viruses that do not replicate in cell culture, or for which a suitable animal model has not been identified.
https://www.virology.ws/2010/01/22/kochs-postulates-in-the-21st-century/
**
Also, just found another one, which, in retrospect, I'm guessing one of the posters was alluding to (without actually saying it):
"Sars-Cov2 is an RNA virus. It contains no DNA."
I'll bring these things up with her.