So if one person has a bad reaction to a vaccine or medication that can save millions, it should be banned?
Like penicillin?
I wouldn't think so but I think that there's no way it should be mandatory for everyone to take penicillin just because some people might catch whatever.
But then I'm against seat belt laws being mandatory for everyone. I can see them being a law for parents to buckle up their kids but once they are of age to decide for themselves then it should be an individual's choice on whether to wear one or not. I would be dead today had I been wearing my seat belt on 9/9/81. The seat belt law had just come into effect a few months previous and I so wanted them to charge me for not wearing one, because to see pictures of the wreckage there's no way anyone would have lived through that. But for it being a new law I suppose they didn't want any Sensational and controversial cases in the news, back when news agencies actually reported the news, so I suppose they thought better of laying a charge on someone who would be a corpse otherwise.
Legislators will often cite, "if it saves one life it's a good law", but I say no, if it kills one life it's a bad law.
The fact that lawmakers have been misled by Pharmacy funded media to push their drugs on everyone is a damn shame. But they need to go after the orchestrators of the whole fucking scamdemic and leave those who rightfully chose not to get a vaccine or social distance or wear a mask, which had no effect whatsoever but were only imposed to hype the fear, the fuck alone!
