COVID-19 'Pandemic'

[Danbones]

Oh, using the 90% inaccurate PCR that the inventor, a major manufacturer and even that tard fauci, the cdc, AND the W.H.O. have said is totally inaccurate the way it is used are you?

I doubt you have a clue at all by the looks of things.

So bright boi, please point me to someone who is in possession of an isolated sample of the real covid 19 virus, or a so called "vaccine" that contains a version of it.

More likely you work for the hedge fund types that just had their @$$e$ whipped in the Gamestop shortselling fiasco.

Why does the WHO Now Admit that the PCR COVID Tests are Not Accurate? So They Can Claim the Vaccine is Working?​

Why does the WHO Now Admit that the PCR COVID Tests are Not Accurate? So They Can Claim the Vaccine is Working? - Medical Kidnap

The World Health Organization released a guidance memo on December 14th, warning that high cycle thresholds on PCR tests will result in false positives. While this information is accurate, it has also been available for months, so we must ask: why are they reporting it now? Is it to make it...

medicalkidnap.com

Anthony Fauci Admits Chances Of Getting Accurate Results From COVID PCR Tests Are ‘Miniscule’​

Anthony Fauci Admits Chances Of Getting Accurate Results From COVID PCR Tests Are 'Miniscule' | Greek News On Demand / ΕΛΛΗΝΙΚΑ ΝΕΑ ΤΩΡΑ

Anthony Fauci Admits Chances Of Getting Accurate Results From COVID PCR Tests Are ‘Miniscule’…

greeknewsondemand.com

Fauci, FDA, WHO All Now Admit False Results From PCR Tests

Fauci, FDA, WHO All Now Admit False Results From PCR Tests - Headline Health

Zero Hedge – The FDA on Monday joined The WHO and Dr. Fauci in admitting there is a notable risk of false results from the standard PCR-Test used to define whether an individual is a COVID “Case” or not. [Full FDA statement below.] This matters significantly as it fits perfectly with the ‘fake...

headlinehealth.com

Gee, maybe you should have used the word "IDIOT" on yourself.

 

[Danbones]

...I'll wait for that isolated Virus dearie...feel free to post a link anytime!

 

[Blackleaf]

Now woke politics is screwing up the vaccination programme​

How our race-obsessed elites have caused black people and Muslims to fear vaccination.

​

BRENDAN O'NEILL​

EDITOR​

28th January 2021
Spiked

We are now reaping the whirlwind of the politics of grievance. The tragic news that many black Britons are cagey about the Covid vaccine is proof, surely, of what happens when you tell a section of society over and over again that they live in an institutionally racist country that loathes them and wants to harm them. You give rise to distrust, to suspicion, to a situation where some members of that section of society come to fear all institutions, even medical ones.

There is much handwringing over wariness of the vaccine among ethnic-minority groups in the UK. Various studies have found that black people in particular say they are probably not going to agree to vaccination. One survey found that a depressing 72 per cent of black Brits said they were ‘unlikely’ to be vaccinated.

The impact of this wariness is already being felt. A survey carried out by Oxford University and the London School of Hygiene and Medicine found that up to 13 January, just 21 per cent of black people over the age of 80 had been vaccinated. And only 30 per cent of Bangladeshi and Pakistani over-80s had been vaccinated. This compares with 43 per cent of white over-80s.

Of course there could be many reasons for this disparity, including problems of communication between the healthcare sector and certain communities, and people in difficult socioeconomic circumstances finding it harder to make or attend vaccination appointments. But the broader suspicion of vaccination among some ethnic-minority groups certainly seems to be playing a role.

There is something very striking in the survey findings about ethnic-minority attitudes to vaccination. They seem to suggest that the better integrated a community is, the more likely it is to view vaccination positively. So an Understanding Society survey found that black communities and Pakistani- and Bangladeshi-heritage communities are significantly less likely to agree to vaccination than Indian-heritage communities.

More than 70 per cent of black respondents to the survey said they were unlikely or very unlikely to be vaccinated. More than 40 per cent of Pakistani or Bangladeshi respondents said the same.

Among Indian respondents, however, only around 20 per cent said they were unlikely or very unlikely to be vaccinated. Which is very close to the response of white British people, around 15 per cent of whom expressed wariness of vaccination.

There are no doubt numerous, complex factors for these disparities in enthusiasm for vaccination. But an important one would seem to be levels of integration and attitudes towards society. It is not a coincidence, surely, that two communities that are constantly told by the identitarian elites that mainstream society and mainstream institutions are antagonistic towards them – that is, the black community and the Muslim community – should arrive at a view that it is not safe to allow the medical establishment to inject something into their arms.

2020 wasn’t only the year of Covid. It was also the year in which the politics of identity and the politics of grievance exploded like never before. In the post-George Floyd moment, the idea that Britain is an inherently racist country, stained and warped by the sins of Empire and slavery, took hold. This view of Britain as indelibly racist, as permanently prejudiced, had been growing for a long time, of course, everywhere from the academy to Guardian newspaper columns to the rump of the old left and the Labour Party. But in 2020, it went mainstream. The message we received constantly – from the political class, from figures in popular culture and from established cultural institutions – is that Britain treats its black population unfairly and horribly and probably always will. It’s in the British gene.

Anyone who questioned the truth of this, anyone who pointed to the huge decline in racist attitudes in recent decades and the wonderful successes of many ethnic-minority communities in terms of education and comparative pay, was shouted down. No message was allowed other than the one saying Britain is a hotbed of racism. Imagine the impact this has on certain communities’ view of themselves and their place in society. It nurtures victimhood, fear, trepidation, the vast majority of which is unwarranted. Vaccine scepticism seems to me to be the most tangible and destructive consequence of the woke elite’s fact-lite narratives of institutional racism and widespread hatred.

Why wouldn’t many black people and Pakistani and Bangladeshi people be wary of a mass-vaccination effort being led by Boris Johnson’s government? After all, they’ve been told, many, many times, that the government is racist, British institutions are racist, Islamophobia is rampant, and Brexit Britain is a country with a renewed loathing of its minority communities. We are now witnessing the toxic consequences of this neo-racialism, of this cynical divisiveness promoted by woke campaigners, rich identitarians and the new elites.

We need the nation to pull together right now, to ensure that as many people as possible consent to vaccination. But pulling together is clearly very difficult in a time when communities are played off against one another and when various parties, groups and influential individuals have a vested interest in maintaining a view of Britain as a hateful, dangerous country for black people and Muslims in particular.

Again we are seeing how terribly the identitarian ideology grates against social solidarity and national unity. We might discover very soon that wokeness isn’t only irritating and censorious – it possibly also kills.

Now woke politics is screwing up the vaccination programme

How our race-obsessed elites have caused black people and Muslims to fear vaccination.

www.spiked-online.com

 

[Blackleaf]

No, because I'm under the essential worker label and am risking my ass every day I work to see patients who either take it seriously or who are like you, fucking idiots who don't.

So, you are in no danger of losing your job and don't seem to be affected that much detrimentally by the lockdown.

Thanks for proving my point.

The lockdowns obviously aren't working and we should never have been put into them in the first. I've been right all along and you know that.

 

[Serryah]

So, you are in no danger of losing your job

And you assume that why?

and don't seem to be affected that much detrimentally by the lockdown.

LOLOL! Your ignorance is amazing! But for clarification - I'm not under lockdown, just Red Phase as listed by the province. It means I can't visit family or friends, I'm limited in what I can and can't do.

That doesn't mean I'm not affected. Every day I work there's a high chance of being infected with Covid despite precautions. Or I could be there when a loved one shows up to emerg and not be allowed to see them despite how bad they may be, because of the restrictions... oh but that doesn't affect people at all, right?

Thanks for proving my point.

I proved no point on your end, you keep proving mine though of your being a snowflake.

 

[Blackleaf]

And you assume that why?



LOLOL! Your ignorance is amazing! But for clarification - I'm not under lockdown, just Red Phase as listed by the province. It means I can't visit family or friends, I'm limited in what I can and can't do.

That doesn't mean I'm not affected. Every day I work there's a high chance of being infected with Covid despite precautions. Or I could be there when a loved one shows up to emerg and not be allowed to see them despite how bad they may be, because of the restrictions... oh but that doesn't affect people at all, right?



I proved no point on your end, you keep proving mine though of your being a snowflake.

Thanks for blatantly proving my point again - you aren't affected by lockdown and that's why it doesn't bother you.

You may have a rather different view if you were on furlough on 80% pay like me or have lost your job.

 

[Serryah]

Thanks for blatantly proving my point again - you aren't affected by lockdown and that's why it doesn't bother you.

So... you assume I'm not affected by any of this because I'm not on YOUR version of a lockdown. Got'cha.

You may have a rather different view if you were on furlough on 80% pay like me or have lost your job.

Likely I would. Likely I'd be pissed... but I also know I wouldn't be doing stupid shit to keep the country being locked down, like pretending this is all a hoax and ignoring the rules. Then, as now, I'd be pissed at people like you who keep pushing us into these lockdowns and be screaming more at you and yours to smarten the fuck up.

 

[Danbones]

​

The probability that said result is a false positive is 97%!!!​

​

​

​

You shouldn't have used the word idiot on anyone but yourself beardie!​

As predicted now that Bidet is president:

Lower Cases Imminent As WHO Drops The Charade Of Erroneous PCR Test Protocol​

It’s possible we are witnessing the unsubtle upending of what has been a response driven more by political positioning than data-based public health policy.

Several recent moves made by public health experts and government officials indicate the stage is being set for a steady, ramping down of the Covid19 saga. Let’s review.

January 2020. The world was just rubbing the sleep from its eyes, trying to understand that the pending response to a virus that seemed to be barreling down upon them in ways that could potentially alter their lives in unimaginable ways.

That same month, Virologists Victor M. Corman, Christian Drosten and others published research in the journal Eurosurveillance, titled Detection of 2019 Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by Real-Time RT-PCR.

The paper’s authors claimed the test to be validated – a robust diagnostic methodology for use in public-health laboratory settings.

Except it wasn’t. Not even close.

With zero accountability, the World Health Organization (WHO) endorsed the Corman-Drosten protocol, leading to its global streamlining as the go-to testing methods to detect SARS-CoV-2.

A November 2020 re-examination of the Corman-Drosten protocol by a group of international researchers and scientists found ten fatal flaws in the WHO-endorsed methods. A primary flaw was the number of amplification cycles recommended – Corman-Drosten WHO-protocol recommend 45. However, the re-examination spotlighted a red flag, stating the following:

“In case of virus detection, >35 cycles only detects signals which do not correlate with infectious virus as determined by isolation in cell culture [reviewed in 2]; if someone is tested by PCR as positive when a threshold of 35 cycles or higher is used (as is the case in most laboratories in Europe & the US), the probability that said person is actually infected is less than 3%, the probability that said result is a false positive is 97%”

…The probability that said result is a false positive is 97%!!! It was known to be erroneous, yet escaped simple correction!

The researchers concluded their paper, while calling for a retraction by Eurosurveillance, with the following statement:

“In light of our re-examination of the test protocol to identify SARS-CoV-2 described in the Corman-Drosten paper we have identified concerning errors and inherent fallacies which render the SARS-CoV-2 PCR test useless.”

….That’s right…USELESS.

Lower Cases Imminent As WHO Drops The Charade Of Erroneous PCR Test Protocol - The HighWire

By Jefferey Jaxen It’s possible we are witnessing the unsubtle upending of what has been a response driven more by political positioning than data-based public health policy. Several recent moves made by public health experts and government officials indicate the stage is being set for a...

thehighwire.com

useless: just like a beardie on the little girls team.

 

[Blackleaf]

'I understand Brexit better now!' Peston lifts lid on EU-Oxford row with bombshell tweet!​

 

[Danbones]

So... you assume I'm not affected by any of this because I'm not on YOUR version of a lockdown. Got'cha.



Likely I would. Likely I'd be pissed... but I also know I wouldn't be doing stupid shit to keep the country being locked down, like pretending this is all a hoax and ignoring the rules. Then, as now, I'd be pissed at people like you who keep pushing us into these lockdowns and be screaming more at you and yours to smarten the fuck up.

Pretending?

It's YOU who is pretending dearie...just like a beardie in the little girls room.

 

[taxslave]

So... you assume I'm not affected by any of this because I'm not on YOUR version of a lockdown. Got'cha.



Likely I would. Likely I'd be pissed... but I also know I wouldn't be doing stupid shit to keep the country being locked down, like pretending this is all a hoax and ignoring the rules. Then, as now, I'd be pissed at people like you who keep pushing us into these lockdowns and be screaming more at you and yours to smarten the fuck up.

This is a problem. WHen some people have lost their jobs/ businesses and government employees get a raise while sitting at home the people losing everything are bound to be mad. Politicians and senior government officials going on sunshine vacations with little repercussions while the rest of us are told to stay home doesn't help. Makes it hard to believe what the government is telling us.
The lockdown hasn't affected me too much since I am semi retired and work in heavy construction, but my wife(younger) is now in the midst of a career change for which Covid is partly responsible. Our current provincial government is a smaller part of the problem. I can live with a face diaper for the small amounts of time I am in a store, but there is no way I would wear one all day. I would however wear my half mask all day, as I often use it for extended periods and find breathing much easier. ALso doesn't tend to fog my glasses as much. We were wearing them for medical calls but now some bureaucrat has decided we have to put a diaper on the exhaust port. Doesn't really work.

 

[Blackleaf]

Farage reacts as EU panic unfolds​

Britain has the upper hand. Let’s use it to our advantage.

 

[Danbones]

And you assume that why?



LOLOL! Your ignorance is amazing! But for clarification - I'm not under lockdown, just Red Phase as listed by the province. It means I can't visit family or friends, I'm limited in what I can and can't do.

That doesn't mean I'm not affected. Every day I work there's a high chance of being infected with Covid despite precautions. Or I could be there when a loved one shows up to emerg and not be allowed to see them despite how bad they may be, because of the restrictions... oh but that doesn't affect people at all, right?



I proved no point on your end, you keep proving mine though of your being a snowflake.

Still waiting for a link to the isolated covid 19 virus...if you or goober can't provide one ( and NOT to the fakenews computer approximation), you will look like dishonest idiots forever...
Even more than you two do now.
:0
Here is your chance to shine.

 

[Danbones]

PS:​

Irish Government Admits: COVID-19 Does NOT Exist​

After months of painstaking freedom of information law requests the government of Ireland has finally come clean and admitted that it has no scientific proof that the SARS-CoV-2 virus (COVID-19) exists. Which other nations are going to be next and admit this pandemic was a scam?

“AS PART OF OUR LEGAL ACTION we had been demanding the evidence that this virus actually exists [as well as] evidence that lockdowns actually have any impact on the spread of viruses; that face-masks are safe, and do deter the spread of viruses – They don’t. No such studies exist; that social distancing is based in science – It isn’t. it’s made up; that contact tracing has any bearing on the spread of a virus – of course it doesn’t. This organisation here – is making it up as they go along.” – Gemma O’Doherty

Irish Government Admits: COVID-19 Does NOT Exist | Principia Scientific Intl.

After months of painstaking freedom of information law requests the government of Ireland has finally come clean and admitted that it has no scientific proof that the SARS-CoV-2 virus (COVID-19) exists. Which other nations are going to be next and admit this pandemic was a scam? "AS PART OF OUR...

principia-scientific.com

..and don't try this crap either, you'll just em bare @$$ yourself.

1. HEALTH /
2. CORONAVIRUS

The Covid-19 virus has been isolated many times​

OUR VERDICT​

This is untrue. Covid-19 has been isolated many times. It does not need to adhere to Koch’s postulates as it is a virus, and Koch’s rules have been widely disregarded now. Covid-19 PCR tests are generally very accurate.

The Covid-19 virus has been isolated many times - Full Fact

Claims that the Covid-19 virus has not been isolated, and therefore tests for it do not work, are unfounded.

fullfact.org

HAHA, see post #13,208 above, where the science is, as well as the legal challenge the genocidal Irish government couldn't meet above, in this post.

 

[Twin_Moose]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1354814901483573261

 

[Blackleaf]

 

[Twin_Moose]

 

[Danbones]

Ask the DR if it contains a version of the virus...

When they say no, not the covid19 virus mNRA "vaccine", you tell him then it isn't even a vaccine.

If Pfizer and BioNTech’s trial continues to go well, their vaccine could be the first of its kind to reach the market. Unlike many other available vaccines, it’s not a live virus that has been weakened, a virus that has been killed, nor a signature viral protein that can dupe cells into producing protective antibodies. Instead, this vaccine relies on messenger RNA (mRNA for short), a type of genetic material that our cells can use as an instruction manual to kick off the process of building virus-busting antibodies. The exciting aspect of this mRNA vaccine—besides its likely efficacy—is that it opens the door for more vaccines like it that can be brought to market.

Broadly, the vaccines available today fall into three buckets. The very first vaccines were made from live viruses that have been weakened or inactivated. These have historically generated some of the strongest immune protection—especially the weakened versions—because they have the most in common with actual pathogens. Examples include vaccines against the measles, mumps, and rubella; the chickenpox vaccine and polio vaccine work the same way, too. Because they’re similar to infectious viruses, developers take extra caution in testing them for safety—especially when confronting a novel virus like SARS-CoV-2.

Then there are protein subunit vaccines, which recreate just one portion of the virus. These still generate an immune response, but they pose no risk of infection. Subunit vaccines like the hepatitis B vaccine and the HPV vaccine can enter the body via all kinds of cellular delivery systems—including genetically repurposed, non-infectious viruses.

The problem with both these kinds of vaccines, however, is that they can take a decade or more to research, develop, and test in clinical trials. But the pressure of the pandemic led researchers to finally execute a third class of vaccine: a nucleic acid vaccine based on mRNA.

Nucleic acid vaccines work by providing the instructional genetic code for the body to make non-infectious viral bits and bobs that kick off an antibody response. So far, the only approved nucleic acid vaccine is for Ebola, which the FDA approved late last year; it uses a form of recombinant DNA to eventually generate immunity against the virus.

The Pfizer/BioNTech uses another kind of nucleic acid called mRNA. As Quartz previously reported, mRNA vaccines provide a different bit of code for our cells to translate into bits of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, which then solicit an immune response. It sneaks those instructions into our bodies using lipid nanoparticles that mimic other types of proteins our cells are used to letting through their membranes.

Pfizer’s vaccine candidate would be the first of its kind

Unlike many available vaccines, Pfizer's is not a live virus that has been weakened or a virus that has been killed.

qz.com

Definition of vaccine
a: an antigenic preparation of a typically inactivated or attenuated (see ATTENUATED sense 2) pathogenic agent (such as a bacterium or virus) or one of its components or products (such as a protein or toxin)

Definition of VACCINE

a preparation that is administered (as by injection) to stimulate the body's immune response against a specific infectious agent or disease: such as… See the full definition

www.merriam-webster.com

WHO Changes Definition of Herd Immunity​

WHO Changes Definition of Herd Immunity

www.theepochtimes.com

 

[Blackleaf]

It's illegal in England and Wales to give someone a vaccine against their will.

 

[Blackleaf]

A walk through a snowy central London, January 2021.

The city of 9.5 million just seems so deserted...