Since the south magnetic pole stopped moving how is the ice cover down there?
Is Antarctica losing or gaining ice?
Since the south magnetic pole stopped moving how is the ice cover down there?
Where do you get your info. Arctic Ice this year has increased 50%.. that after the AGW publicity machine publicized we had seen the last of the Polar Ice Cover.. for ever. Almost all of their most alarming predictions of sea water rise is based on the Polar Ice melts. It's NOT happening. We've had the coldest winter in a century in North America and Europe. Not only is this not incorporated into their modeling data.. it's not even mentioned.
As for dissenters. I would love to see one honest debate about the AGW and its methods and scientific credibility on CBC or PBS with both sides represented.. but it is disallowed by its political and philosophical masters. They've deemed this proven science even though all the empirical evidence.. the foundation of the scientific method.. indicates it is a fraud.. and its proponents are liars.
AGW is a pathetic, shameless shambles now. With its proponents increasingly using smoke and mirrors illusions to make up for the contradictions in its science.
Greenhouse gas isn't the problem.
Greenhouse gasses don't drive ocean currents or jet streams.
.
We've been down this road too, if you recall. I said that if the Greenhouse Effect is wrong, if there is no blanketing effect from the atmospehere, then why doesn't the Earth decrease in temperature to -200 or so at night. Your response was that the oceans conserved heat. But if that were the case then just the oceans would stay warm, but the atmosphere would drop to -200 or so. And you never responded to that.
If you throw away the Greenhouse Effect, you have to come up with another plausible reason why the temperature doesn't plummet when there is little incoming solar radiation (i.e. night time).
What secret knowledge. 0.8C is SFA in geological terms over the Holocene Optimum.
The earths atmosphere is never electrically disconnected from the sun nor the planet. It's a complete circuit, always.![]()
Holocene-schmolocene... If that were true, the UN, IPCC, East Anglia, Gore and Suzuki would have told us by now, ergo, it simply just isn't true
I understand that theory. I need to see the math as to how that electricity is converted to heat.
Coming up, I have it somewhere. A hint----water is a good conductor so the earths blanket is electric.![]()
That explains the water. What about the atmosphere?
Wait until next winter. All the albedo is going to keep things cool this summer.Do you actually enjoy the grandstanding on half truths when it's so easy to debunk this stuff?
It's like scientists enjoy putting this stuff up because they know it will eventually lead to denier foot in mouth disease.
In September, the U.S. National Snow and Ice Data Centre reported that Arctic ice cover at its summer minimum this year was 5.1 million square kilometres. That was also up 50 per cent from last year's record low, but the sixth lowest on record. The seven lowest levels have all been recorded in the last seven years.
CBCNews.ca
That explains the water. What about the atmosphere?
Suspended particulates.
Dinah-moe
Dinah-moe
Dinah-moe
Dinah-moe
Wait until next winter. All the albedo is going to keep things cool this summer.
Watch and learn son.
You still have to read and research more. Just because an organization has the suffix ' -watch' behind their name means little these days.
Yes, by all means read and research more. It never should have meant anything to call something '______watch'...though I guess if you're swayed by Baywatch babes like Jenny McCarthy, reading Manabe is not really your cup of tea.
Try the primary sources instead of blazing roadkill blogs...that's what historians do too.
Do you actually enjoy the grandstanding on half truths when it's so easy to debunk this stuff?
It's like scientists enjoy putting this stuff up because they know it will eventually lead to denier foot in mouth disease.
In September, the U.S. National Snow and Ice Data Centre reported that Arctic ice cover at its summer minimum this year was 5.1 million square kilometres. That was also up 50 per cent from last year's record low, but the sixth lowest on record. The seven lowest levels have all been recorded in the last seven years.
CBCNews.ca
The tactics of the AGW Mob is to blind with selective and selectively expressed graphics.. essentially presenting a complex case that they assume will be beyond the understanding and therefor the scrutiny of the public.
In this case the word 'record' is used repeatedly.. but it is never defined. There was an absence of polar ice in the 1850s which would support the case that it ebbs and flows in cycles that are extremely complex and iterative, and little understood by (real) science.. but NOT related to the minute contribution of human carbon to the atmosphere.
When you consider that the prescriptions for AGW involve a massive reduction in the industrial and agricultural capacity of the world you can glean the real agenda behind the cult. It is evident that their real target is human population, since this drastic and reduction in carbon would make it impossible to support the earth's present population.
This puts it the same philosophical sphere as that of radical pagan environmentalism which proposes a eco utopia with at most 10% of the world's present population.. living in de-industrialized harmony with nature.
That is more than just nonsense.. it is dangerous. It supports all the resemblances of AGW and Radical Environmentalism to that of the occult and racist theories of Naziism
Nothing the AGW cabal puts out can be trusted. It is a criminal enterprise driven by a fanatical agenda.
To the water vapour comment - it's not a forcing, but it does accelerate warming from CO2.
Explaining how the water vapor greenhouse effect works
Said it befroe and I'll say it again--why not look through the p[ast few pages of posts and see where the fanaticism lies? You and darkbeaver seem more alarmist than, say, me and Tonington. So far I thihnk I've posted the arctic sea ice satellite record, did a quick calc on the mass of CO2 in the atmosphere versus the mass of CO2 anthropgenically emitted.
On the other hand, you and darkbeaver are throwing around words like fraud and comparing me to a Nazi.