The republicans are awash in a sea of hypocrisy, homophobia and their own rhetoric. They have no ideas to bring to the table so they shout and scream "Nazi", "Communism" and "freedom" when it was they who took away "Freedom" with the patriot act and made the US an Nazi state. The thing they count on most is that all their ranting will sway the majority of stupid people who are patriotic without a thought of their own, who have no idea what is really going on.
Christine O'Donnell vs. Chris Coons Debate on C-SPAN
- Thread starter mentalfloss
- Start date
Wow, are you ever full of hate. Please have a drink and relax. Did the rebubs kill your family, or something worse?
No, just calling them as I sees them. If anybody is full of hate it is the tea baggers and the right wing loons.
No, I'm still here.
I suppose being an anarchist is left of left. Politics is a fools game, a movie they play to convince the deluded that they have some rights, that their vote counts when in fact you only have the right to chose which puppet the ruling class chooses to rule over you. Democracy is an illusion.
You mean like the way he opened Obamacare to sincere and thoughtful debate? O wait, it was deemed, I forgot. Nevermind.
lol I've never met an anarchist who wouldn't be food within the first few days of real anarchy.
Darn post merging.
In all fairness, Christine O'Donnell is far better prepared to be a Senator, than Obama ever was to be President.
Furthermore, while it is possible that - if elected - she could and would learn on the job, while seeing how stubburn and obtuse Obama is, that is impossible to hope for.
Furthermore, while it is possible that - if elected - she could and would learn on the job, while seeing how stubburn and obtuse Obama is, that is impossible to hope for.
Sure thing Jack. Glad you would vote for a president who doesn't even know the constitution, lol
Republican Senate nominee Christine O'Donnell, who has said she would make decisions in Washington based solely on the Constitution, suggested in an interview today that she doesn't believe the founding document calls for a separation between church and state.
"Where in the Constitution is separation of church and state?" an incredulous O'Donnell asks her Democratic opponent, Chris Coons. The audience is heard laughing in the background. "Let me just clarify, you're telling me that the separation of church and state is found in the First Amendment?"
"Government shall make no establishment of religion," Coons responds.
"That's in the First Amendment," O'Donnell says.
Later, O'Donnell was asked if she would support repealing the 14th, 16th and 17th amendments. She knew the 17th Amendment, but could not remember the others. "I'm sorry, I didn't bring my Constitution with me… Fortunately, senators don't have to memorize the Constitution. Remind me of what the other ones are."
On Politics: Covering the US Congress, Governors, and the 2010 Election - USATODAY.com
YouTube - Christine O'Donnell ignorant of the Constitution (go to 2:37)
Last edited:
I wonder if she just got confused like a lot of people are with the name "Constitution" and " the bill of rights" which is in fact the first ten amendments of the constitution...???
Some might refer to it as the first bill of rights....???
Some might refer to it as the first bill of rights....???
At least she never insisted, like your false idol, that America has 57 states.
And - again - unlike your false "god" she never needed a teleprompter to take breath.
lol
Poor Jack. It's gotten so bad that you are actually defending a politician who doesn't even know the constitution. Kind of silly to munch on the party line so fervently when even bad republicans are good republicans to you. I bet if someone asked her about nullifying the 10th amendment, she wouldn't even know why.
Poor Jack. It's gotten so bad that you are actually defending a politician who doesn't even know the constitution. Kind of silly to munch on the party line so fervently when even bad republicans are good republicans to you. I bet if someone asked her about nullifying the 10th amendment, she wouldn't even know why.
mentalfloss, your god, Obama knows the Constitution so well, that he is willing to falsify it at every chance he's got. He pretends to dazzle his sycophants by "quoting" The Declaration of Independence, The Bill of Rights, etc. always conveniently omitting words from them, that he vehemently hates, because he does not know the meaning of. You know, like "Creator" and "God". Safe to say, that if it was "Allah" he would be repeating it time and time again.
BTW, there is nothing in the U.S. constitution that reads: 'separation of church and state'.
BTW, there is nothing in the U.S. constitution that reads: 'separation of church and state'.
Government making 'no law respecting an establishment of religion' is widely accepted to signify a separation of church and state. This is both on a federal and local basis. In fact, the Supreme Court makes explicit reference to that separation in association with the first amendment.
Which is extremely ironic, because, if you recall correctly in that earlier debate, O'Donnell couldn't come up with one solitary issue had with the Supreme Court. One would think that a principle that she is so staunchly against - the separation of church and state - which is also the same principle promoted by the Supreme Court, would move her to bring that up. I guess not -- despite the fact that one of her 'constitutional beliefs' is that the educational system should be teaching creationism. Well, I'm sure glad she stands for something: a stupid contradiction.
Whatever. If you want to put faith in someone that dumb, that's your loss.
Which is extremely ironic, because, if you recall correctly in that earlier debate, O'Donnell couldn't come up with one solitary issue had with the Supreme Court. One would think that a principle that she is so staunchly against - the separation of church and state - which is also the same principle promoted by the Supreme Court, would move her to bring that up. I guess not -- despite the fact that one of her 'constitutional beliefs' is that the educational system should be teaching creationism. Well, I'm sure glad she stands for something: a stupid contradiction.
Whatever. If you want to put faith in someone that dumb, that's your loss.
Last edited:
Fine and dandy, mentalfloss, but I am still waiting for you addressing the fact that your god, Obama willfully and callously falsified - by obvious omission - the documents America was based upon, and he has the unmimitigated nerve to claim that he is an expert, you know, professor of.
Compared to this phoney, Christine O'Donnell is a genuine article of honesty.
Compared to this phoney, Christine O'Donnell is a genuine article of honesty.