I think the jury was suckered and that they didn't keep their eye on the ball.
If the jury is feeling sick over their verdict, they knew that something is wrong with their decision. Why didn't they put more time into the task and ensure that they were confident in their decision?
You know what is kind of sad ... Ms Anthony doesn't seem to understand how much the general public disagrees with the verdict. She showed up for sentencing half believing that she would walk out of court that day. She was as dolled up as she could be given that she's been living in solitary confinement for 3 years. I half suspect that, in her world, she expects to emerge from the jail as some sort of celebrity to the cheers of the crowds. She may even think that all the fuss that will be put into safely removing her from the jail is an attempt to thwart her moment of glory.
As long as people are commenting on this disgusting skag, she will be under the impression she is some kind of celebrity.
She is a celebrity; that's the American dream, to be on television.
It doesn't matter if you're on tv because you're being tried for murder, or if you are in a **** competition to get married, as long as you're on tv.
But she's not a celebrity.
I don't believe everyone is that shallow.
Of course she's a celebrity, you can't stop talking about her.
Of course she's a celebrity, you can't stop talking about her.
Maybe not everybody, but look at the ratings of court tv, 'the bachelor/bachelorette', maury povich, etc etc etc.
There seems to be a huge number of people who want to be on these reality shows, and a bigger number of people who want to watch them.
I think she expects to waltz out of prison holding her head up high as a victim of the justice system. I think the extra days on her sentence are to assimilate her out of the jail without her being like Alex, in Clockwork Orange, who could not survive in the world that he so eagerly exploited and indulged in prior to imprisonment.
In this case, too many people want to punch Ms Anthony.
I don't believe everyone is that shallow.
I have to disagree that the jury took the time they needed to arrive at a verdict that they could live with. We've heard that the jury was sick over the verdict, and that the foreperson was uncomfortable with putting his signature on the verdict sheet.
She is a celebrity; that's the American dream, to be on television.
It doesn't matter if you're on tv because you're being tried for murder, or if you are in a **** competition to get married, as long as you're on tv.
Making the RIGHT . LAWFUL decision is not always a happy one. Would they have been happier declaring her guilty without the evidence to support it??? Is THAT right??
The EMOTIONS have gotten control of far too many now........and those emotions are preventing folks from being logical / objective as the law requires.
Woud you have felt better if they took a much longer time and came up with the same verdict?? Would it have made any significant difference??
If the jury is returning a verdict, but they are feeling sick about their decision, then it suggests to me that they are not comfortable with their decision. I think they should have continued to deliberate until such time that they could deliver a verdict that they felt comfortable with.
I think the strangest thing I've heard from a juror is that the case was circumstatial so the prosecution didn't present a case. They were very definitely waiting to see a video of the murder.
I have to disagree that the jury took the time they needed to arrive at a verdict that they could live with. We've heard that the jury was sick over the verdict, and that the foreperson was uncomfortable with putting his signature on the verdict sheet.
Sorry to disappoint, but I have no ability to turn some trashy, talentless, murderous, angry high school drop out into a celebrity.