I think Justin would be very wise to pay close attention to Trump and try to absorb some of his wealth of knowledge (and put his camera away while doing so.)
Canadians overwhelmingly disagree with Trump victory
- Thread starter mentalfloss
- Start date
I think Justin would be very wise to pay close attention to Trump and try to absorb some of his wealth of knowledge (and put his camera away while doing so.)
Flossy's overwhelming majority in the thread header must be the same overwhelming majority of 39.5% that Trudeau won with at the last election, versus Harper barely squeaking in with 39.62% in 2011.....
Typical Leftard mathematics......
Typical Leftard mathematics......
She got less votes than a Black guy with a Muslim middle name from Kenya. That speaks volumes about her likeability......
He has run one of the lousiest presidential campaigns ever. In saying so I am not referring to his much-criticized business practices or his vulgar remarks about women. I mean this in a purely technical sense: this man fractured his own party. His convention was a fiasco. He had no ground game to speak of. The list of celebrities and pundits and surrogates taking his side on the campaign trail was extremely short. He needlessly offended countless groups of people: women, Hispanics, Muslims, disabled people, mothers of crying babies, the Bush family, and George Will-style conservatives, among others. He even lost Glenn Beck.
She was the Democratic candidate because it was her turn and because a Clinton victory would have moved every Democrat in Washington up a notch. Whether or not she would win was always a secondary matter, something that was taken for granted. Had winning been the party’s number one concern, several more suitable candidates were ready to go. There was Joe Biden, with his powerful plainspoken style, and there was Bernie Sanders, an inspiring and largely scandal-free figure. Each of them would probably have beaten Trump, but neither of them would really have served the interests of the party insiders.
https://www.theguardian.com/comment...ld-trump-white-house-hillary-clinton-liberals
There's a big problem with the criteria of the popular vote. It only concern # of people. It has no consideration with any of the other aspects. To bear this out just remove one large city from the mix eg. N.Y. or L.A or Chicago and it may tell a different story. I think quibbling over 0.31% is both petty and childish if you are going to ignore the other factors. Popular vote favours large densely populated areas.
then seek help and quit yer bitchin'.
maybe volunteer with the nice senior citizens or at a sick kids ward at the hospital. that'll get you out of your poor-me funk there cuck.
Where the hell did I say anything even approaching that? That Trump (or Hillary) was anywhere near the best choice? If you had read anything I've written on trump, you'd know I agreed that he is "a bigoted, misogynistic, self admitted sexual predator" and a liar and a moron to boot. But he is now the President, fairly elected, and one should for a moment stand back and let him work. You can jump all over him if/when he screws up.
Gerry.....attack me for what I say, fine. I would, however, appreciate if you would refrain from putting words in my mouth that I never said, and that I strongly disagree with, and then attacking me on that basis.
So triggered your syntax and grammar have now gone out the window....and you still haven't taken me up on that bet...
Grow up.
Indeed but there is one thing everyone is overlooking, he is a builder.
Everyone agrees there is a desperate need for infrastructure.
Trump knows the price of concrete, rebar, aggregates, equipment and labour to cost jobs.
America could be getting the most bang for their buck and a faster cheaper return to "greatness".
Trump knows the price of concrete, rebar, aggregates, equipment
Now, if he'd only pay his suppliers for them, now and again ...