I saw a bumper sticker :
IF YOU CAN'T STAND BEHIND OUR TROOPS
THEN
STAND IN FRONT OF THEM
I want this bumper, really really bad!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I saw a bumper sticker :
IF YOU CAN'T STAND BEHIND OUR TROOPS
THEN
STAND IN FRONT OF THEM
Anyway, all polls show that the majority of Canadians do not support this mission. Do you guys really think that will change in a couple of years? Canadian troops will be coming home in 2009.
Noam Chomsky is a fool and you sound like Hugo Chavez pawning off Chomsky's BS..A good quote from Noam Chomsky,
"...the point of public relations slogans like "Support Our Troops" is that they don't mean anything [...] that's the whole point of good propaganda. You want to create a slogan that nobody is gonna be against and I suppose everybody will be for, because nobody knows what it means, because it doesn't mean anything. But its crucial value is that it diverts your attention from a question that does mean something, do you support our policy? And that's the one you're not allowed to talk about." Noam Chomsky
Why is Noam Chomsky a fool? You say things without backing it up. You sound like Anne Coulter.
If you ask the question in a staight forward way, yes they do support the mission.
The polls that indicated the negative, were missleading questions at best, at worsed, they were devised to produce an incorrect answer.
You actually believe anything the US government says??? You gotta be blind!
The men and women of the Canadian Forces have demonstrated time and again that they will rise to any challenge. Let your Canadian Forces members know you appreciate their service by sending a message using this monitored message board.
http://www.forces.gc.ca/site/Community/Messageboard/index_e.asp
Latest information for families
Mission Information Line
If you would like to get an up-to-date situation report about any mission involving Canadians, you can call the Mission Information Line at
1-800-866-4546
This page is continually under review and will be updated as new information is received.
This page was last updated on June 17, 2004 8:05 AM
Military Family Resources Centre
Quick Links
http://www.army.forces.gc.ca/38cbg_hq/Headquarters/Family_Sp/Family_Support.htm
Noam Chomsky is a fool and you sound like Hugo Chavez pawning off Chomsky's BS..
Noam Chomsky is a fool and you sound like Hugo Chavez pawning off Chomsky's BS..
The Verdict is In: TV News is Bad for Your Brain
[SIZE=+3]A[/SIZE] study has revealed that people who rely on television to get their news are more likely to be misinformed on the facts about Iraq, WMD's and Iraq's ties to 9/11 than those who get their news from other sources or even who don't follow the news at all.
The study polled over 3,000 people on their perceptions about international support for the Iraq War, ties of Saddam Hussein to the events of 9/11, and the Discovery of WMD's in Iraq. What they found, incredibly, though not surprising, was that the more people got their news from TV, the higher the frequency of their misperceptions
Out of all the news networks, of course, Fox News ranked highest among misinformed viewers. The lowest was PBS.
Bush's support tied to misperceptions
Another angle of the poll was to group by Bush supporters or Democratic candidate supporters. Naturally, the vast majority of the misinformed were Bush supporters. This included Democrats that supported Bush.
http://americanassembler.com/issues/media/
The impact of Bush linking 9/11 and Iraq
March 14, 2003
American attitudes about a connection have changed, firming up the case for war.
By Linda Feldmann
Staff writer of The Christian Science Monitor
WASHINGTON – In his prime-time press conference last week, which focused almost solely on Iraq, President Bush mentioned Sept. 11 eight times. He referred to Saddam Hussein many more times than that, often in the same breath with Sept. 11.
Bush never pinned blame for the attacks directly on the Iraqi president. Still, the overall effect was to reinforce an impression that persists among much of the American public: that the Iraqi dictator did play a direct role in the attacks. A New York Times/CBS poll this week shows that 45 percent of Americans believe Mr. Hussein was "personally involved" in Sept. 11, about the same figure as a month ago.
Sources knowledgeable about US intelligence say there is no evidence that Hussein played a role in the Sept. 11 attacks, nor that he has been or is currently aiding Al Qaeda. Yet the White House appears to be encouraging this false impression, as it seeks to maintain American support for a possible war against Iraq and demonstrate seriousness of purpose to Hussein's regime...
http://www.csmonitor.com/2003/0314/p02s01-woiq.html
...Public opinion polls taken in the Islamic world in recent years provide considerable insight into the roots of Muslim hostility toward the United States, indicating that for the most part, this hostility has less to do with cultural or religious differences than with US policies in the Arab world...
...The issue that arouses the most hostility in the Middle East toward the United States is the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and what Muslims perceive as US responsibility for the suffering of the Palestinians...
...if the United States is serious about winning the so-called “war on terror,” then resolution of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict should be among its top priorities in the Middle East...
...the Bush administration’s war on terror has been a major reason for the increased hostility toward the United States. The Pew Center’s 2003 survey found that few Muslims support this war...
...Most Muslims see the US fight against terror as a war against the Islamic world...
...Bin Laden has referred to the suffering of the Palestinians and the Iraqis (especially with respect to the deaths caused by sanctions) in all of his public statements since at least the mid-1990s. His 1996 “Declaration of Jihad” is no exception. Nonetheless, it primarily focuses on the idea that the Saudi regime has “lost all legitimacy” because it “has permitted the enemies of the Islamic community, the Crusader American forces, to occupy our land for many years.” In this 1996 text, bin Laden even contends that the members of the Saudi royal family are apostates because they helped infidels fight the Muslim Iraqis in the Persian Gulf War of 1991...
...Feelings of impotence, humiliation, and rage currently pervade the Islamic world, especially the Muslim Middle East. The invasion and occupation of Iraq has exacerbated Muslim concerns about the United States. In this context, bin Laden is seen as a heroic Osama Maccabeus descending from his mountain cave to fight the infidel oppressors to whom the worldly rulers of the Islamic world bow and scrape...
http://hir.harvard.edu/articles/print.php?article=1184
...General Rick Hillier is a Newfoundlander who combined something of John Crosbie's legendary bashfulness and tact with Sheila Fraser's notorious allergy to candour and speaking out when the occasion demands it.
In other words, dropping all irony, he's a classic straight shooter, doesn't run around issues, knows his own mind and is more than willing to share a piece of it with the press, the public, and one presumes the prime minister.
He might, for all this gift of direct speech and his loathing of politically correct embroidery, be considered an anti-politician. Consider Hillier's most famous offering on the nature of the Taliban and insurgent forces in Afghanistan. I quote, "They are detestable murderers and scumbags. I'll tell you that right up front. They detest our freedoms, they detest our society, they detest our liberties."
The clarity of that statement along with its splendid vigour or phrasing is almost a milestone in Canadian public speech. A lone lamp in a long deep fog. If there's horse manure on the plate, Hillier is not going to call it mayonnaise, which is a good thing. However much the focus groups and communication strategists teach public figures to lay on the goop and smother every hard truth with soft and evasive words, they break trust with the public and in some cases with reality itself...
Rex Murphy
http://www.cbc.ca/national/rex/rex_060420.html