LMAO!!!
You know nothing about North American history, except for what you were fed is erroneous British history books.
It's time for you to stop listening to North American historians, who tend to romanticise North American history and give North Americans a sense of victimhood.
The reality is that the British looked after the Native Indians and gave them their own reservations to live in outside our North American colonies.
When the Yanks stole our colonies off us, creating the USA, they then weren't content with stealing British land and wanted to move their borders westwards. "Manifest Destiny" they called it. This push westwards encroached onto the Native Indians lands which had been granted to the Native Indians by the generous British. So what happened? The Yanks took the Native Indian lands, incorporating them into the fledgling USA, and massacred many of the Indians in the process. There's a reason why so many Indians tried to massacre Yanks in the old cowboy movies.
Many Americans and Canadians seem to forget that vast numbers of Native Indians were allied to the British in their fight against American nefariousness. It was you lot many of them hated. They quite liked us British, though.
Ya, it seems our head of state really didn't give a flying fu ck about the First Nations people.
It wasn't canada's Head of State which didn't give a **** about them. It was Canada's Head of Government, whom you lot elected.
You really need to start learning how the Canadian governmental system actually works.
We are so glad you feel that way. Like I said we keep how nice Canada is a secret to keep the riff raff out.
It is precisely because the US has an elected head of state that makes them so much more democratic than Canada where for some reason we are stuck with an unelected inbred foreigner for head of state.
Nazi Germany was a republic with an elected Head of State, but you'd be daft to point to that as a shining beacon of democracy.
Have you ever noticed that it seems to only ever be republics which become dictatorships? It never happens to constitutional monarchies.
The fact of the matter is that the US is NOT very democratic. As not only Tober, but also myself, have pointed out, Canada is far more democratic than the US is. So too, for that matter, is Britain.
In fact, most of the top ten most democratic countries in the world in 2012 are constitutional monarchies, and four of the top five most democratic nations in the world - Norway, Sweden, Denmark and New Zealand - are constitutional monarchies. I doubt this is a coincidence. I think they are very democratic precisely because they are constitutional monarchies.
And how does the "great democratic republic" the United States fair well on the Democracy Index? It ranks as the 21st - yes, the 21st - most democratic nation in the world, behind even countries like Uruguay and Mauritius.
France, that other supposed beacon of great republican democraticness, fairs even worse than the USA. It ranks as only the 28th most democratic nation in the world, just behind Cape Verde. So much for the Revolution.
Most Democratic Nations 2012 (CM = constitutional monarchy) (R = Republic)
1) Norway (CM)
2) Sweden (CM)
3) Iceland (R)
4) Denmark (CM)
5) New Zealand (CM)
6) Australia (CM
7) Switzerland (R)
8 ) Canada (CM)
9) Finland (R)
10) Netherlands (CM)
11) Luxembourg (CM)
12) Austria (R)
13) Rep of Ireland (R)
14) Germany (R)
15) Malta (R)
16) UK (CM)
17) Czech Rep (R)
18 ) Uruguay (R)
19) Mauritius (R)
20) South Korea (R)
21) USA (R)
Democracy Index 2012 - knoema.com
Four of the top five most democratic nations are constitutional monarchies, and so are seven of the top ten. Nine of the top twenty are constitutional monarchies, which is very good whenyou consider most countries in the world are republics.