They scramble interceptors from cold lake because their always ready to go,that cant happen in the arctic(I worked on the cold lake range this spring,very interesting and a bit scary getting buzzed by jets breaking the sound barrier) and hercs land anywhere as its easy to build a strip for them on any lake(did that too)as they need only a mile or less to land.
I never saw anyone traveling in cammo after one day at rankin inlet at minus 50,they usually traded for fur as soon as possible,the cold weather military gear just doesnt cut it.
and who really cares if theres subs cruising under ten feet of ice,russian or otherwise?
If someone's gonna nuke us or the usa it will be a full blown attack from more places then a couple subs
Far as sovereignty go's there are Canadians living there so it's ours.
Once again your factually wrong.
I am really not trying to pick on you and I agree with lots of your other posts but be aware when you claim to know whats going on in a certain place the possibility exists
that others have equivalent or greater experience in the locale.
I have been schooled a quite few times on this forum, happens all the time.
Back to the debate at hand.
You said there were no subs in the Arctic.
I pointed out there are hordes of them.
Now you don't care.
You said the military in the Arctic seems primitive.
I pointed out many parts of Canada's military in the north are extremely high tech.
I told you that there is a massive American airbase in Thule and now you are saying planes cannot fly in the Arctic and can only fly out of Cold Lake.
Your flat wrong.
Dude at 45,000 feet its always really cold.
There is on this forum a guy named Juan.
I totally disagree with his politics but when it comes to flying planes in Canada I would pass on arguing with him personally.
My guess is he will confirm planes fly in really cold weather.
Granted a problem exists in maintaining, servicing and safety starting up planes in cold weather but its do-able.
You were in Rankin Inlet.
In the greater scheme of things that's really not very far north.
Check it out on google maps.
Alert on Ellsmere is thousands of kilometers north of Rankin.
And so is Thule, Greenland.
The reality is you were in the deep south when it comes to really high Arctic latitudes.
And way up there different nations have planes, bombers, choppers, subs and god knows what all.
It's a massive pain in the ass to do and maintain but it can be done.
And as for swapping out cold weather gear for furs in Rankin.
Come on.
I was thousands of miles north of you and we wearing high tech, state of the art cold weather gear.
And so does the military.
And it isn't furs.
Nothing wrong with with native cold weather gear.
I am aware how caribou and seal furs have hollow insulating hairs.
And how durable and warm it is.
But have you ever seen a climber on Everest in furs?
No?
Ever seen a National Geograpic show on researchers on the south pole with people dressed in furs?
No?
Same deal up north.
And I mean way, way up north.
Further north than where the Inuit hang out.
The high tech stuff works just fine.
It just needs wolverine fur hood trim to prevent frosting up.
Your statement about cold weather military gear "not cutting it" is completely wrong.
The Canadian military has access to the same gear that goes up mountains and crosses the poles.
It works pretty good all things considered.
The Canadian military's machine guns shoot.
The planes fly.
The subs skulk about (of course they are not Canadian subs).
And so forth and so on.
I just don't think your an expert on it.
Nor am I really.
I think I just saw some things you haven't.
Trex