Atheist Group Demands That Gov. Scott Walker Delete Religious Tweet

shadowshiv

Dark Overlord
May 29, 2007
17,545
120
63
52
atheists, they so mad. :lol:

A Wisconsin-based atheist organization has demanded that that Governor Scott Walker remove a posting on the social media website Twitter that is religious in nature.

The Freedom From Religion Foundation stated Tuesday that they took exception to Walker's official account, including a tweet posted Sunday that simply read, "Philippians 4:13."

As rendered by the New King James Version, Philippians 4:13 states, "I can do all things through Christ who strengthens me."


more


Atheist Group Demands That Gov. Scott Walker Delete Religious Tweet

These atheists do realize that they don't have to be douchebags, right? How is what they are trying to do (by pushing their "beliefs" down everyone's throats) any different from what they are complaining that people that are Christian (or other religions) are doing? I am not overly religious, yet I don't find anything offensive about what he placed in his tweet. If you don't like it, don't read it! Simple.

I should add that by "these atheists" I mean the ones that complain about every little slight, not the majority of them that are just like everyone else.
 

captain morgan

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 28, 2009
28,429
148
63
A Mouse Once Bit My Sister
why do you think those atheists are liberal?

You equate "liberal" with "atheist"?

Traditionally, it is the 'liberal' movement that opens the 'rights' door so far open that it pits one person's rights against another.

In this case, the Gov apparently has no right to express their position and in doing so, the aethist group is now pushing their morals and values onto this person.

BTW - Regardless of your stance on the separation of Church and State, freedoms and rights associated and/or related to religion are outlined in the US constitution... Walker was voted in by his constitutents and in the event that the electorate is upset about his reference to religious text, they can vote him out, or conversely, reelect him based on that element of his character.
 

Dexter Sinister

Unspecified Specialist
Oct 1, 2004
10,168
539
113
Regina, SK
Re: Atheist Group Demands That Gov. Scott Walker Deletso challenge we Religious Tweet

These atheists do realize that they don't have to be douchebags, right?
Well, no, they probably don't. Douchebaggery knows no limits. I'm an atheist, but these people are pathetic. So the guy expressed a religious opinion, so challenge what he said, trying to suppress him is absolutely the wrong response. Always and forever. If free speech doesn't extend to the free expression of ideas you don't like, then you don't really believe in free speech.
 

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
61,446
10,123
113
Washington DC
BTW - Regardless of your stance on the separation of Church and State, freedoms and rights associated and/or related to religion are outlined in the US constitution...
The sum total of the "outlining:"

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof. . ."
U.S. Const., Amdt I.

Walker was voted in by his constitutents and in the event that the electorate is upset about his reference to religious text, they can vote him out, or conversely, reelect him based on that element of his character.
The whole notion of rights is that they are not subject to who is in office at the moment.
 

Cannuck

Time Out
Feb 2, 2006
30,245
99
48
Alberta
Traditionally, it is the 'liberal' movement that opens the 'rights' door so far open that it pits one person's rights against another.

In this case, the Gov apparently has no right to express their position and in doing so, the aethist group is now pushing their morals and values onto this person.

BTW - Regardless of your stance on the separation of Church and State, freedoms and rights associated and/or related to religion are outlined in the US constitution... Walker was voted in by his constitutents and in the event that the electorate is upset about his reference to religious text, they can vote him out, or conversely, reelect him based on that element of his character.

Nice speech but I don't buy it. I think you call everybody you disagree with a lib-tard.
 

Locutus

Adorable Deplorable
Jun 18, 2007
32,230
47
48
67
I should add that by "these atheists" I mean the ones that complain about every little slight, not the majority of them that are just like everyone else.

Yeah, your garden-variety atheist or theist is probably an ok person, but the loud crying ones from any side are the pains in the a s s. The school tattletales, the squealers, crybabies and such. Who needs 'em. :lol:
 

captain morgan

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 28, 2009
28,429
148
63
A Mouse Once Bit My Sister
The sum total of the "outlining:"

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof. . ."
U.S. Const., Amdt I.


The whole notion of rights is that they are not subject to who is in office at the moment.

Exactly where did Gov Walker make a law in this?

Further, he has his rights (like everyone else) regardless of whether he/she is in office or not

Nice speech but I don't buy it. I think you call everybody you disagree with a lib-tard.


It was a nice speech, wasn't it.

... And I only calls 'em likes I sees 'em.