atheists, they so mad. :lol:
A Wisconsin-based atheist organization has demanded that that Governor Scott Walker remove a posting on the social media website Twitter that is religious in nature.
The Freedom From Religion Foundation stated Tuesday that they took exception to Walker's official account, including a tweet posted Sunday that simply read, "Philippians 4:13."
As rendered by the New King James Version, Philippians 4:13 states, "I can do all things through Christ who strengthens me."
more
Atheist Group Demands That Gov. Scott Walker Delete Religious Tweet
why do you think those atheists are liberal?
You equate "liberal" with "atheist"?
Well, no, they probably don't. Douchebaggery knows no limits. I'm an atheist, but these people are pathetic. So the guy expressed a religious opinion, so challenge what he said, trying to suppress him is absolutely the wrong response. Always and forever. If free speech doesn't extend to the free expression of ideas you don't like, then you don't really believe in free speech.These atheists do realize that they don't have to be douchebags, right?
The sum total of the "outlining:"BTW - Regardless of your stance on the separation of Church and State, freedoms and rights associated and/or related to religion are outlined in the US constitution...
The whole notion of rights is that they are not subject to who is in office at the moment.Walker was voted in by his constitutents and in the event that the electorate is upset about his reference to religious text, they can vote him out, or conversely, reelect him based on that element of his character.
Traditionally, it is the 'liberal' movement that opens the 'rights' door so far open that it pits one person's rights against another.
In this case, the Gov apparently has no right to express their position and in doing so, the aethist group is now pushing their morals and values onto this person.
BTW - Regardless of your stance on the separation of Church and State, freedoms and rights associated and/or related to religion are outlined in the US constitution... Walker was voted in by his constitutents and in the event that the electorate is upset about his reference to religious text, they can vote him out, or conversely, reelect him based on that element of his character.
I should add that by "these atheists" I mean the ones that complain about every little slight, not the majority of them that are just like everyone else.
The sum total of the "outlining:"
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof. . ."
U.S. Const., Amdt I.
The whole notion of rights is that they are not subject to who is in office at the moment.
Nice speech but I don't buy it. I think you call everybody you disagree with a lib-tard.
Of course. Only Christians would be smart enough to be conservatives.
I would have used the word dose instead of case.You mean now I gotta get a case of religion to go with my great brain?