America at War

[jimmoyer]

Moghrabi ?

Could you please read my post on the case for AMBIGUITY ??

You gotta just change that fastball, man. Try a knuckleball or hell, even a spitball, or a changeup.

Iiiii yiii yi yi
I am a frito bandito....

uh oh...
my window of clarity gives way to the blinds drawn...

I must return to my rocking chair...

 

[moghrabi]

Re: RE: America at War

Moghrabi ?

Could you please read my post on the case for AMBIGUITY ??

You gotta just change that fastball, man. Try a knuckleball or hell, even a spitball, or a changeup.

Iiiii yiii yi yi
I am a frito bandito....

uh oh...
my window of clarity gives way to the blinds drawn...

I must return to my rocking chair...

I like it my way. It exposes the truth faster.

 

[EagleSmack]

Re: RE: America at War

Drop the crap, think not. Just because I take the time to point out the fallacies you and your ilk promote is no reason to make every post about me.

You flatter yourself, all I do is point out your narrow-mind. You take things out of context when it suits your purpose of self-promotion and self-adervtising.

The only ilk I see here, is you and whoever pays you to further your slander.

Perfect ITN... I have been trying to point that out all along.

 

[Reverend Blair]

:roll:

 

[Ocean Breeze]

Re: RE: America at War

Drop the crap, think not. Just because I take the time to point out the fallacies you and your ilk promote is no reason to make every post about me.

You flatter yourself, all I do is point out your narrow-mind. You take things out of context when it suits your purpose of self-promotion and self-adervtising.

The only ilk I see here, is you and whoever pays you to further your slander.

Perfect ITN... I have been trying to point that out all along.

:roll: :laughing5:

 

[peapod]

Well since the rev is getting paid for his twaddle by somebody 8O He should be buying the drink on friday night :lol: :lol:

 

[EagleSmack]

Re: RE: America at War

ITN: you really don't wanna play with the Rev here. If I were you, i'll think twice about it.

Just a brotherly advice.

I think ITN does very well against Rev. He is clear, makes his points, makes sense, and does not stoop to name calling or insulting. The Rev should return the curtesy.

 

[EagleSmack]

Re: RE: America at War

That's the spirit. We should have arrested Bush when he was in Canada...not on his official trip because he had diplomatic immunity on that, but one of trips up here to kill our wildlife. We were actually obligated to under international conventions.

lol.... as if.

 

[EagleSmack]

Re: RE: America at War

To the honorable Moghrabi:

Your potential for interference with muggings is highly selective. Saddam gets a bye.

To the predictable, and therefore "trusted" offshore Ocean Breeze:

Your presumptions are too numerous and would require too tedious an effort.

But here's a sampling that contradicts your logic:

1. the massacre of muslims by the Serbs
You'd like to use the Hague world court AFTER THE FACT.

2. Rwanda.
AFTER THE FACT. Please don't run interference within that country's borders. And Reverend Blair's fake fact that America prohibited anyone from acting there is a legend only bespeaking of his bias.


3. the ethnic cleansing in Yugoslavia, and Iraq.
Don't be running traffic lights there.

BRAVO.... Perfect point in Rawanda Jim!

Hey... what were Canadian troops trying to do by interfering with an internal problem? Unsuccessfully I might add.

It is Rawanda's business. The famine and massacres were contained to Rawanda and was not a threat to Canada at all. The Rawandan army did not invade Canada.

It sounds like an illegal occupation to me. I think every Canadian politician should be arrested and tried for war crimes.

 

[moghrabi]

Re: RE: America at War

ITN: you really don't wanna play with the Rev here. If I were you, i'll think twice about it.

Just a brotherly advice.

I think ITN does very well against Rev. He is clear, makes his points, makes sense, and does not stoop to name calling or insulting. The Rev should return the curtesy.

Are you insinuating that I or the Rev revert to name calling? I think if you look at your own posts, you'll see who is doing the name calling. You had one too many warnings not to start that again.

 

[Reverend Blair]

BRAVO.... Perfect point in Rawanda Jim!

It's not a point at all, not even with Jimmy's revision of history and denial of the role that the US played (along with France) in keeping anything from being done in Rwanda.

Are you insinuating that I or the Rev revert to name calling?

He's just exhibiting his ignorance, Mog. He's used to the troll board.

 

[moghrabi]

You bet he his. Since he started here, he can't take an opposing view. It is his way or the HWY. He can forget that or he can go back to the troll board.

 

[moghrabi]

You bet he his. Since he started here, he can't take an opposing view. It is his way or the HWY. He can forget that or he can go back to the troll board.

 

[Ocean Breeze]

Re: RE: America at War

sorry folks......quirk in the system resulted in double post.

 

[Ocean Breeze]

Re: RE: America at War

To the honorable Moghrabi:

Your potential for interference with muggings is highly selective. Saddam gets a bye.

To the predictable, and therefore "trusted" offshore Ocean Breeze:

Your presumptions are too numerous and would require too tedious an effort.

But here's a sampling that contradicts your logic:

1. the massacre of muslims by the Serbs
You'd like to use the Hague world court AFTER THE FACT.

2. Rwanda.
AFTER THE FACT. Please don't run interference within that country's borders. And Reverend Blair's fake fact that America prohibited anyone from acting there is a legend only bespeaking of his bias.


3. the ethnic cleansing in Yugoslavia, and Iraq.
Don't be running traffic lights there.

BRAVO.... Perfect point in Rawanda Jim!

Hey... what were Canadian troops trying to do by interfering with an internal problem? Unsuccessfully I might add.

It is Rawanda's business. The famine and massacres were contained to Rawanda and was not a threat to Canada at all. The Rawandan army did not invade Canada.

It sounds like an illegal occupation to me. I think every Canadian politician should be arrested and tried for war crimes.

cute! one can only sympathize with people having this kind of mindlock. Just more spin to divert from the real and more serious issue that is up close and personal now. Diversional tactics don't play..

What are you afraid of??? the TRUTH maybe??? Would the TRUTH shatter your delusions??? ( your ego, your PRIDE) Would the TRUTH emasculate your testosterone driven society???

 

[EagleSmack]

Re: RE: America at War

You bet he his. Since he started here, he can't take an opposing view. It is his way or the HWY. He can forget that or he can go back to the troll board.

Talk about the pot calling the kettle black. Geez.

You just can't accept the fact that people aren't buying into your lies.

 

[peapod]

God Dam it!!!! I am not babysitting you lot all day...next person that calls name is banned for the day.

 

[moghrabi]

Re: RE: America at War

You bet he his. Since he started here, he can't take an opposing view. It is his way or the HWY. He can forget that or he can go back to the troll board.

Talk about the pot calling the kettle black. Geez.

You just can't accept the fact that people aren't buying into your lies.

Are you caling me liar? Just refute my opinions without personal attacks. Can't you do this simple task.

 

[mrmom2]

Peapoo nanananananan :lol:

 

[EagleSmack]

Re: RE: America at War

You bet he his. Since he started here, he can't take an opposing view. It is his way or the HWY. He can forget that or he can go back to the troll board.

Talk about the pot calling the kettle black. Geez.

You just can't accept the fact that people aren't buying into your lies.

Are you caling me liar? Just refute my opinions without personal attacks. Can't you do this simple task.

Stop your whinning and stop trying to get me banned. You know that is your goal. The moderators aren't buying into.