Allies Would Be Shocked if Canada Retreated

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
Sometimes having a reputation is a bad thing. In the second world war the Canadian soldiers were sent to areas where the Allies were having problems because we got things done. In Afghanistan Canada was given the south which is the most dangerous part of the country and the most difficult to defend. I was listening to an American General on the news the other day. He stated after the Medusa mission based on the Canadian ferocity, the Taliban would not face the Canadians in an open battle again. Maybe the NATO forces should be placed under a Canadian Commander and the troops intermingled so all countries involved face the same degree of difficulty. Who knows maybe the other NATO forces could learn something from the Canadians


Here is a little known tid bit, and proof of what you say,,,

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Devil's_Brigade

They never retreated and never surendered an inch of gained ground. Although I was not a member, a lil before my time, the story of the "Devil's Brigade" made an impact on me. "Never Retreat and Never Surender", followed by "Das Dicke Ende kommt noch", tattoo'd on my arm under my Regimental ensignia. Even though they were a mixed unit, the Canadian in them sure did shine through.
 

BitWhys

what green dots?
Apr 5, 2006
3,157
15
38
Yep something changed we learned the French, German and Italian troops don't have to leave their party tents and are not "Permitted" to go outside after dark. Welcome to summer camp in Afghanistan Nato Members. Soup call at 11 sharp, sorry that's the Navy.

Am I to assume it doesn't bother you that O'Conner lied?
 

Minority Observer84

Theism Exorcist
Sep 26, 2006
368
5
18
The Capitol
Whether it’s the right-wing pro-American government of John Howard or it’s anyone else in the world, any criticism directed at Canada for admitting we made a mistake in throwing our young men and women into harms way in the cause of legitimizing American propaganda should be quietly ignored.

Canada shouldn’t have troops in Afghanistan and a withdrawal should have been begun months ago.

How legitimate can this action in Afghanistan be when rationally dissected?

Whether they’re from Italy, Ireland, Russia China or Japan, terrorists and gangsters have killed thousands while committing their crimes. The streets of Chicago, Montreal, Vancouver, New York, all major cities in North America have been battlegrounds for criminals and criminal gangs since the end of the First World War, and has any nation decided it appropriate to “police” these criminals countries of origin?

And yet now because the Taliban were complicit in supporting the criminal conspiracy of Al Queada who attacked the U.S. Spain, Britain and a number of other nations, the Afghan people are dying. If the United States wants to find Osama bin Laden and round up the perpetrators behind 9/11 then fine, but where is the line drawn between going after the guilty and punishing the whole nation?

The United States has used and supported terrorists (gangsters) both directly by training terrorists and by funding and militarily supporting oppressive regimes across a wide spectrum of nations. Dictatorships having found a sympathetic ear in American business circles, legitimizing murder and mayhem from Nicaragua and Panama to East Timor Columbia and Indonesia and Malaysia.


That’s an observation not a judgment by the way.

Israel has used both with permission and without permission, Canadian passports as subterfuge in prosecuting their war on the “enemies of Israel”, an action if committed by many different nations would be justly called spying and rank right up there with the heinous judgments leveled against the Soviets.

Is it the cause of “justice” that’s behind the current action in Afghanistan or is it a manipulation by American oil cartels to attempt to secure a pipeline right of way that the Soviets failed in doing a number of years ago?

If the hunger for retribution and desire to punish those responsible for September 11/2001 is behind the militarism taking place in Afghanistan, why aren’t there actions being taken against Saudi Arabia, Yemen or a number of other nations that have also participated in over-looking Al Qeada?

Because it’s not about bringing democracy to Afghanistan, and not about hunting down the bad guys from 9/11, it’s all about American corporate warfare to retain control over the supply and distribution of fossil fuels.

And if any Canadian thinks that the American corporate community cares whether Canada approves or disapproves of its policies and actions, we have only to remember our wonderful North American Free Trade Agreement to garner some insight into how prepared the United States is to honor its “agreements”.

What the American engine of commerce loves to see though is a mindless ape like Stephen Harper capitulating to every American injustice and sacrificing Canadian men and women in supporting that engine. When the time comes when it’s Canada’s turn to reap the rewards of being the good little neighbour, having embraced the warmongering of the American administration and having aligned ourselves with the U.S. military in murdering innocent Afghanis and Iraqis you can bet any decision to reward Canada will be subject to the same formula and dynamics found acceptable or unacceptable in our wonderful NAFTA “agreement”.

Canada should be out of Afghanistan and never should have become involved there in the first place.

We have FBI and CIA policing inside Canada now, we have patrol boats along our Great Lakes mutual border that have mounted machine guns, we have watched the great Stephen Harper screw Canadians out of a billion dollars in the name of cow-towing to American industry….

Why don’t we just send a delegation to Washington and surrender now?

All the rabid pro-American fanatics here at Canadian Content would welcome taking down the Canadian flag and raising Old Glory over their homesteads I’m sure.

Well saved me a lot of typing there mike :)
 

Dixie Cup

Senate Member
Sep 16, 2006
5,808
3,653
113
Edmonton
I am very proud of what we're doing in Afghanistan and I hope that we continue.

Before we even went there, I was wondering why the world was ignoring what was going on there. The Readers Digest had an article at the time (gez 6 or 7 or 8 years ago?? can't remember) and I was appalled at what was happening there. I wrote to various government organizations asking why we weren't doing anything. So I was happy when NATO went in.

I'm ashamed of the world's response, however, for the likes of Dufar, Rawanda and others. We should have done exactly the same thing but we didn't. God help us for ignoring those people in their time of need. We have much to explain as part of the world who, for all intents and purposes allowed hundreds of thousands of people die. I don't know how some of the world's leaders sleep at night knowing this. Ah, but of course, it was the UN involved there wasn't it!! If anything was to be bombed in the US, that building and those in it would be my first choice!!

JMO
 
  • Like
Reactions: Colpy

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
Sometimes having a reputation is a bad thing. In the second world war the Canadian soldiers were sent to areas where the Allies were having problems because we got things done. In Afghanistan Canada was given the south which is the most dangerous part of the country and the most difficult to defend. I was listening to an American General on the news the other day. He stated after the Medusa mission based on the Canadian ferocity, the Taliban would not face the Canadians in an open battle again. Maybe the NATO forces should be placed under a Canadian Commander and the troops intermingled so all countries involved face the same degree of difficulty. Who knows maybe the other NATO forces could learn something from the Canadians

With regards to WWII where might those areas be? The British didn't get Canada really into the picture until 1943 Sicily. Unless of course you count Dieppe. That didn't go too well.
 

lone wolf

Grossly Underrated
Nov 25, 2006
32,493
210
63
In the bush near Sudbury
Tell that to the First Division who were there for Christmas 1939 - many of whom fought their ways (assigned to British units) across North Africa. Tell it the airmen who fought the Battle of Britain or with Coastal Command. I dare you to say it to the many hundreds of men on North Atlantic convoy escorts and PICKET details - or even to men who staffed BCATP and turned out pilots and crews in the thousands. Let's not forget Canadians in Singapore, Ceylon and Hong Kong - a great many of whom never came home. Where might those areas be?

Woof!
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Just the Facts

gerryh

Time Out
Nov 21, 2004
25,756
295
83
Wolf and Facts...haven't you heard? The americans won both WWI and WWII with basically no help from anyone else....pretty well single handed from what I have been told.
 

Just the Facts

House Member
Oct 15, 2004
4,162
43
48
SW Ontario
Wolf and Facts...haven't you heard? The americans won both WWI and WWII with basically no help from anyone else....pretty well single handed from what I have been told.


:smile: Homey don't play that game. I'm a proud Canadian but I also have a world of respect and admiration for Americans.

A question was asked and we answered. :cool:
 
  • Like
Reactions: karrie

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
Tell that to the First Division who were there for Christmas 1940 - many of whom fought their ways (assigned to British units) across North Africa. Tell it the airmen who fought the Battle of Britain or with Coastal Command. I dare you to say it to the many hundreds of men on North Atlantic convoy escorts and PICKET details - or even to men who staffed BCATP and turned out pilots and crews in the thousands. Let's not forget Canadians in Singapore, Ceylon and Hong Kong - a great many of whom never came home. Where might those areas be?

Woof!

Funny... I just can't find any Canadian Units in WWII N. Africa in the Canada at War webpage.

But what I asked was not whether Canada contributed to the war effort. I asked him to give some examples as to where US and British troops were pulled out and Canadians put in because they are better.

The thing is that you Candians LOVE to zing the US and others at every step. Look at the arrogance in the guys post.


"A Canadian should be put in charge of NATO Forces"


"NATO can learn from Canada."


"Canadians were put in the tough spots over Americans and British." (or something like that.)


You speak arrogantly and go Ape Dung when someone talks back. But Heaven forbid you get ZINGED back! All JIHAD breaks loose!
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
Wolf and Facts...haven't you heard? The americans won both WWI and WWII with basically no help from anyone else....pretty well single handed from what I have been told.


Who said that?


Ohhhhh...right. That is another Canadian "thing".
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
Here is a little known tid bit, and proof of what you say,,,

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Devil%27s_Brigade

They never retreated and never surendered an inch of gained ground. Although I was not a member, a lil before my time, the story of the "Devil's Brigade" made an impact on me. "Never Retreat and Never Surender", followed by "Das Dicke Ende kommt noch", tattoo'd on my arm under my Regimental ensignia. Even though they were a mixed unit, the Canadian in them sure did shine through.


Cool. And by mixed you mean a US-Canadian Special Forces Unit. Check out their patch. Tip of the arrow.
 

lone wolf

Grossly Underrated
Nov 25, 2006
32,493
210
63
In the bush near Sudbury
Funny... I just can't find any Canadian Units in WWII N. Africa in the Canada at War webpage.

Are your reading skills not up to snuff? Google up all the Canadians you want to. When men are assigned to other units, (British in this case) for all intents and purposes, they are part of that unit - just like you thought all the Canadians at Singapore were (Hiroshima thread) Gee ... one might think a smart "marine" like you would know how that works.

But what I asked was not whether Canada contributed to the war effort. I asked him to give some examples as to where US and British troops were pulled out and Canadians put in because they are better.

This is the statement you questioned:
"...In the second world war the Canadian soldiers were sent to areas where the Allies were having problems because we got things done...."

Then, you planted this:
"...The British didn't get Canada really into the picture until 1943 Sicily...."

So ... you were enlightened.

BTW.... I dare you - even now - to infer to any member of 1 SSF that any man was better than another or imply that patch means anything other than a proud unit.

Woof!
 
Last edited:

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
Canadian units were just not used until later in the war. They weren't ready. As much as Canada loves to claim being in the war before the US... they really weren't "IN" the war. Canada's first war death is listed as a PVT who was executed after he surrendered which occured after the attack on Pearl Harbor.


The Battle of Britain? There were volunteer Americans there too. There was also the Tiger Airforce which was battling the Japanese prior to Pearl Harbor.


When you said I was enlightened when mentioning Sicily... well I wonder how? Canadian units were used in Sicily but they were under British control not in replacement of British troops because the Brits "could not get things done."


As far as the 1st SF... I just thought it was funny that he picked out this unit as an example of how Canadians are better than everyone else... but yet the unit was half made up of Americans! Don't you think that is funny? :lol:
 

lone wolf

Grossly Underrated
Nov 25, 2006
32,493
210
63
In the bush near Sudbury
Canadian units were just not used until later in the war. They weren't ready. As much as Canada loves to claim being in the war before the US... they really weren't "IN" the war. Canada's first war death is listed as a PVT who was executed after he surrendered which occured after the attack on Pearl Harbor.

Do you Google your intel? I doubt if you ever cracked a book, or asked a vet - where the facts live.

As members of the Commonwealth, Canadians weren't regarded as Canadian units until morale problems forced Britain to relent, respect our identity and give due credit for our part.


The Battle of Britain? There were volunteer Americans there too. There was also the Tiger Airforce which was battling the Japanese prior to Pearl Harbor.

Nobody ever said there weren't American volunteers. It might surprise you to know how many actually did go through BCATP. We know about 1st AVG too ... even to their real nic: the Flying Tigers.

When you said I was enlightened when mentioning Sicily... well I wonder how? Canadian units were used in Sicily but they were under British control not in replacement of British troops because the Brits "could not get things done."

No ... you were enlightened about Canadians being a part of the show prior to 1943. Do you read in depth or just pick out bits and pieces?


As far as the 1st SF... I just thought it was funny that he picked out this unit as an example of how Canadians are better than everyone else... but yet the unit was half made up of Americans! Don't you think that is funny? :lol:

I think it is an insult to a proud regiment that you would interpret it that way. A real Marine would know those Canadians were combat experienced - even if it was with BEF and involved a retreat (Dunkirk) - and you just can't get better instruction than from peers who have eaten dirt on a battlefield.

BTW it's 1st SSF (Special Services Force) Show a little respect. It was half Yank...

Woof!
 
Last edited: