No, I stuff them.Oh, and Dex, do you starch your shirts?
He was also virulently anti-Semitic and a major jerk about it toward the end of his life.Martin Luther was a great man. He founded the Protestant Church.
No, I stuff them.Oh, and Dex, do you starch your shirts?
He was also virulently anti-Semitic and a major jerk about it toward the end of his life.Martin Luther was a great man. He founded the Protestant Church.
No, I stuff them.
He was also virulently anti-Semitic and a major jerk about it toward the end of his life.
I'd have thought that would be common knowledge among serious students of Christianity. Any decent biographical reference about Martin Luther should tell you about his anti-Semitism and its influence on later Christian thinking, except maybe the ones put about by Lutherans, they don't like to be reminded of it and tend to respond that he was an ailing old man at the time and no longer thinking clearly. Look up the piece on him in Wikipedia.Do you have any citations to share with us to support your statement, Dex?
Some Christian's renounce it. Others want to redeem it. What is your opinion of/approach to Halloween? What biblical principles apply?
I'd have thought that would be common knowledge among serious students of Christianity. Any decent biographical reference about Martin Luther should tell you about his anti-Semitism and its influence on later Christian thinking, except maybe the ones put about by Lutherans, they don't like to be reminded of it and tend to respond that he was an ailing old man at the time and no longer thinking clearly. Look up the piece on him in Wikipedia.
Halloween was around long before christians decided to pre empt it for their own purposes.
Besides it is the only time Rocky Horror Picture SHow is on.
"Wikipedia is not considered a credible source. Wikipedia is increasingly used by people in the academic community, from freshman students to professors, as an easily accessible tertiary source for information about anything and everything. However, citation of Wikipedia in research papers may be considered unacceptable, because Wikipedia is not considered a credible or authoritative source. This is especially true considering anyone can edit the information given at any time." Wikipedia:Academic use - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Feel free to cite "any decent biographical reference about Martin Luther", Dex.
"Wikipedia is not considered a credible source. Wikipedia is increasingly used by people in the academic community, from freshman students to professors, as an easily accessible tertiary source for information about anything and everything. However, citation of Wikipedia in research papers may be considered unacceptable, because Wikipedia is not considered a credible or authoritative source. This is especially true considering anyone can edit the information given at any time." Wikipedia:Academic use - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Feel free to cite "any decent biographical reference about Martin Luther", Dex.
This is not a scholarly academic paper, it's an Internet discussion forum, tertiary sources are all you're likely to find here. The citations at the end of the Wikipedia piece on Luther will give you everything you want to know, they ARE scholarly academic works, and in particular I'd draw your attention to the sources cited in footnotes 8 and 198 to 203. Do your own research if you doubt me and Wikipedia.Feel free to cite "any decent biographical reference about Martin Luther", Dex.
Dooderotomy is not the words of god, they are Hebrew law, just like Leviticus. Most of the stuff in them are ignored by Christians except when they want to justify their prejudices and bigotry."For example, never sacrifice your son or daughter as a burnt offering. And do not let your people practice fortune-telling or sorcery, or allow them to interpret omens, or engage in witchcraft, or cast spells, or function as mediums or psychics, or call forth the spirits of the dead. Anyone who does these things is an object of horror and disgust to the Lord." (Deuteronomy 18:10-12 NLT)
This is not a scholarly academic paper, it's an Internet discussion forum, tertiary sources are all you're likely to find here. The citations at the end of the Wikipedia piece on Luther will give you everything you want to know, they ARE scholarly academic works, and in particular I'd draw your attention to the sources cited in footnotes 8 and 198 to 203. Do your own research if you doubt me and Wikipedia.
Now, now, Dex. Just because he's being a pain is no reason to humiliate him by pointing out that he apparently doesn't know how to click on a footnote.This is not a scholarly academic paper, it's an Internet discussion forum, tertiary sources are all you're likely to find here. The citations at the end of the Wikipedia piece on Luther will give you everything you want to know, they ARE scholarly academic works, and in particular I'd draw your attention to the sources cited in footnotes 8 and 198 to 203. Do your own research if you doubt me and Wikipedia.
No,I knew that about him long before I read the Wikipedia entry on him, it was part of the European history I got in school, grade 7 or 8 I think, in the lessons on the Protestant Reformation.
Which is mythology invented for didactic and doctrinal purposes, not a historical event. That's not compassion Luther was showing, it's the arrogant condescension of closed-minded certainty.The content at the beginning of this exerpt is condemning towards Jewish people. The final statement is compassionate. Martin Luther was experiencing a soul struggle here not unlike that of Christ in the garden at Gethsemane:
I'd have thought that would be common knowledge among serious students of Christianity. Any decent biographical reference about Martin Luther should tell you about his anti-Semitism and its influence on later Christian thinking, except maybe the ones put about by Lutherans, they don't like to be reminded of it and tend to respond that he was an ailing old man at the time and no longer thinking clearly. Look up the piece on him in Wikipedia.