Al Queda suicide bombers dispatched to Canada

Karlin

Council Member
Jun 27, 2004
1,275
2
38
Al Queda showed film of trainees that were destined for the four nations occupying Afghanistan now - Germany, Britian, the USA, and Canada.

When Al Queda bombed that train in Italy, it was said to be a direct protest about italy's troops being in Afghanistan. That led to the changing of Italys government in an election following that train blast. A "pro-war" government was tossed out and Italy's troops came home from their illegal and immoral occupatiopn of Afghanistan.

WE should be so lucky here in Canada!!

Links, articles:
Suicide bombers preparing for Canadian, U.S. attacks
http://tinyurl.com/3ye8pn

Suicide bomber report a Taliban 'PR move': Day
http://tinyurl.com/2sxnto

Up to 60 'Civilians killed' in Afghan battle June 19th,2007
http://tinyurl.com/3yvslm

Canada's casualties
http://tinyurl.com/39v3gc

Afghanistan - information -
http://tinyurl.com/2j29oz
 
Last edited:
May 28, 2007
3,866
67
48
Honour our Fallen
So, exactly what is "illegal" about the UN approved mission in Afghanistan?

just for starters.
I hear ya!
Well I'm confused about the whole opium hash deal happening , but we do need to bring that part of the world up to at least the 20 century.
forget democracy and political ideals , we need at least 25 years of a semblance of freedom to take hold and squash the need for this taliban extremist teachings ....did you see the teenagers getting ready to kill them selves....they looked healthy and well fed...for what...for that guy teaching them what to do to be able to inflict barbaric ritual to entire region.....Are the leaders ever gonna do the suicide shuffle....I don;t think so.


We need to stay the course....i know i feel ashamed asking that of anyone...i don't know how leaders can commit troops to such a thing....
 

Logic 7

Council Member
Jul 17, 2006
1,382
9
38
Al Queda showed film of trainees that were destined for the four nations occupying Afghanistan now - Germany, Britian, the USA, and Canada.

When Al Queda bombed that train in Italy, it was said to be a direct protest about italy's troops being in Afghanistan. That led to the changing of Italys government in an election following that train blast. A "pro-war" government was tossed out and Italy's troops came home from their illegal and immoral occupatiopn of Afghanistan.

WE should be so lucky here in Canada!!

Links, articles:
Suicide bombers preparing for Canadian, U.S. attacks
http://tinyurl.com/3ye8pn

Suicide bomber report a Taliban 'PR move': Day
http://tinyurl.com/2sxnto

Up to 60 'Civilians killed' in Afghan battle June 19th,2007
http://tinyurl.com/3yvslm

Canada's casualties
http://tinyurl.com/39v3gc

Afghanistan - information -
http://tinyurl.com/2j29oz


Nice fairy tail. Where is the evidence that alqueada was behind that train attack in italy?

hey by the way, it was in spain, really not the same place at all.so again where is the evidence that alqueada was behind the attack?

good luck.
 
Last edited:

MikeyDB

House Member
Jun 9, 2006
4,612
63
48
So, exactly what is "illegal" about the UN approved mission in Afghanistan?

just for starters.


Because a decision is made by the U.N. ...by a standard of "law" that is rejected by many...for instance the United States won't sign-on to many of the conceptual structures of international "law"...does an action that is sanctioned by one group that believe it to be "lawful" mean that this decision and the resulting action is "legal" even to those who reject the fabric of international law to suit their own purposes...

For starters.
 

Northboy

Electoral Member
Goodwill is a reciprocal process, both ways...

As far as the rest of the world goes, its about time Canada looked deep inside itself and made a commitment to what they truly believe....

I stand by what I said, don't underestimate the power of the weapon of Goodwill...

Your defense is certain...
 

Northboy

Electoral Member
Yep, pretty much....

I stand by what I said, the weapon of choice for Canada is Goodwill, in a reciprocal context...

Let's remember what we are discussing hear is a "news story" and no event has happened as of yet...

I have simply stated that it would be unwise on the part of the "other side", whatever the "other side" is to consider any aggression against Canada.

Take this as the ramblings of a country bumpkin, some religious nut,delusional hippie or whatever badge of honour the Lord has put into your mind to consider me..

Don't much care..

Call it a prophecy, call it a warning...

The Truth will be known postumously, as it always is...
 

MikeyDB

House Member
Jun 9, 2006
4,612
63
48
Triedit

Whether you believe me or not....and whether you care what I think or not, it's important to engage our lives and the experience of our life using every facility and skill, every fiber of our being...to understand what's going on ...what we will face as the demands challenges and decisions that we will ineviably face....that will have direct effect on our lives.

If you could provide me with an example of when the "walk softly but carry a big stick" philosophy has resulted in the peaceful resolution of any major event ....and wasn't accompanied by enormous costs of life and civility and natural resources and destruction to everything around it....I'd entertain that philosophy.

When we act to bring change....now remember I didn't say "respond to change" through the use of artificial agents of change....there will be consequences.

When we act to increase our own level of prosperity...enhance our personal "quality of life", work industriously to the betterment of our personal, local experience of existence and that work and that prosperity bring change to the world....there is a necessity imposed on not only the rest of mankind but on those most eager to exclusive entitlement.

Do you honestly think that your knowledge of history, your personal experience of how our governments have expressed and manifested your sense of entitlement to that better life that higher living standard that ...notion that "We're the biggest baddest dudes on the block and we're prepared to kill anyone who'd dare stand in the way...."Walk softly but carry a big stick"...hasn't contributed to the hatred that millions feel for our countries and our people?

What do you remember first?

Is it when you heard a strange noise in the night air and your mother or father came to your bedside and hugged you until your fear went away....

Or is it the memory of a swift backhand accompanied by a scream to keep quiet or don't do that..."

We remember what we are taught...what we learn from those around us....
 

triedit

inimitable
I absolutely believe that if a peaceful solution is to be had, we should make all attempts at it. I do believe in goodwill, and I do believe in negotiation. I just think it is ridiculous to apply that logic to a group like al Quada.

Certainly the US stand has contributed to hatred. But in all honesty, I also believe that Canada has just as much responsibility in this particular case. Al Quada isn't about the US being bad guys. They hate all western civilsation, of which Canada is a large part--especially since thier involvement in Afghanistan. To think Canada is immune simply because they didnt START something is naive at best.

Using goodwill with al quada is akin to trying to reason with a three year old. It's a wasted effort.

Now while we're talking about how bad the US is, let me tell you this. Certainly there are US policies abroad that encourage outrage, especially in the last 10 years or so. Actually, pretty much since Regan. Possibly before. But by and large the US doesnt make physical attacks on places simply for thier culture and lifestyle. The US tries dipolmacy far more often than war. The US doesnt wage war based on Religion. The US doesn't always get it right, but for the most part, Bushco excluded, thier heart is in the right place.

One thing I find about Canadians is that they don't get the dynamic effect of the political system in the US. Nobody in government is there forever. It may seem like it! But very soon, Bush will be gone and even his republican replacement is going to be better than what's there now. And in each administration there is something the one after it is going to change. Yes, arms were sold. That doesnt mean that the current administration shouldn't address what was done with those arms. Pakistan is a grand example of how the US finds itself between a rock and a hard place. The US doesnt want to embargo them/have a war because they are making an effort, but it's well known that al Quada is hanging out there. Can't please anybody in that case. Israel is another example. The US (and most of the world) see Israels right to be a sovereign nation but does not always approve of thier tactics to remain so. Talks continue.

I guess my point is twofold. First, that history doesnt have to repeat itself and the government is dynamic in that one will handle things differently than the rest. Secondly, Im not advocating that being a major military power trumps everything. I just think that in the case of al Quada, diplomacy and goodwill are pointless from ANY country.