Ahh these pitbulls again

Vanni Fucci

Senate Member
Dec 26, 2004
5,239
17
38
8th Circle, 7th Bolgia
the-brights.net
Re: RE: Ahh these pitbulls ag

Cosmo said:
Vanni ... went to breeder sites and got the pix. ;)

Pitbulls are cross breeds, by definition, tho.

K...the reason that I tagged bottom right as a hound of hell is because it looks just like my brother-in-law's infernal beast...same crazy-ass look in it's eye and everything... 8O
 

mrmom2

Senate Member
Mar 8, 2005
5,380
6
38
Kamloops BC
The circle I used to run with was strickly fighting pitbulls Juan :wink: .They never used to let them fight to the death but I did see a couple dogs get put down because the were badly hurt :( I went to the fights about 5 or 6 times I never really got into it like my roomate he was huge into it breeding and fighting for a few years .We had 23 of them at our house in New Westminster one day .There incredible dogs I really liked them but I'd never have one as a family pet .You just never know when they could snap its bread into them and you have to respect that :wink:
 

#juan

Hall of Fame Member
Aug 30, 2005
18,326
119
63
Cosmo

This is a champian Pitt Bull. His name is, no kidding, "Tyson".

 

Cosmo

House Member
Jul 10, 2004
3,725
22
38
Victoria, BC
RE: Ahh these pitbulls ag

Awww ... check out the "smile" on Tyson! Looks like my sister's pitbull!

Excellent page, Juan ... I attempted to do the same thing myself, but that is way better. Lots more choices. Certainly proves my point! Took me half a dozen tries to find the nasty pitbull in the bunch. Of course I recognized the Jack Russells right off ... and mine is certainly more likely to bite than most of those dogs listed there! Nasty little wench, she is!
 

#juan

Hall of Fame Member
Aug 30, 2005
18,326
119
63
You did well Cosmo. That link simply reinforces what you were saying. I can't believe the number of times I tried to guess the Pit Bull. (eight.) My question is, "Who will decide if an animal is to be killed?" I hope some enforcer isn't just given a picture of a Pit Bull and told to put down all animals that look like that.
 

Rat888

New Member
Jan 5, 2006
1
0
1

Okay, granted this is a very sad thing that has happened to a child, but don't make it sound as though pitbulls are the only breed to attack a child or anyone for that matter. If you train a dog to be mean, than that is what it will be. You really have to look at the immature people having children. Why put an animal to death for something it would have done in the wild? It is an instinct for any living thing to protect its own. When a person in self-defense kills or beats up someone or something, that is what they cry out "self-defense", "I was just protecting myself/husband/wife/child." We get to defend our actions, but animals don't get to defend themselves. No the boy should not have been locked in the basement, but if he got out than obviously it wasn't locked. We don't know the whole story, usually when I hear of a dog attack; My first thought is "well what did they do to provoke it." If you see a dog that is growling at you, go away from it. If you don't know the dog, don't touch it. but if you decide to ignore the signs well then you deserve any repercutions. Maybe the mother couldn't put the dogs in the basement, she probably thought she was keeping her child safe, but I'am sure that this 12-year old knew, as well as, the mother that you shouldn't go near the dogs while the female is in heat or something like that. He was 12yrs. old he should have listened, sad I know, but true.
[/list]
 

tracy

House Member
Nov 10, 2005
3,500
48
48
California
The owners need to take sole responsibility. It is almost always their fault. I say this as someone who has owned "pitbulls" (that's not even a real breed name since it covers several breeds if you ask most people). I now have a small terrier (about 15lbs) and he is the first dog I've had who has bitten a human.
 

Colpy

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 5, 2005
21,887
848
113
70
Saint John, N.B.
Re: RE: Ahh these pitbulls again

tracy said:
The owners need to take sole responsibility. It is almost always their fault. I say this as someone who has owned "pitbulls" (that's not even a real breed name since it covers several breeds if you ask most people). I now have a small terrier (about 15lbs) and he is the first dog I've had who has bitten a human.

I would agree the fault for dog attacks lies mostly with the owner.

I am not particularly impressed with the idea of "banning" breeds.

But, the question is, why does anyone choose to own a breed bred for its aggressive characteristics?

Usually it is because they are arseholes, taking us back to the top of the post. (present company excluded of course) :)
 

Jay

Executive Branch Member
Jan 7, 2005
8,366
3
38
"But, the question is, why does anyone choose to own a breed bred for its aggressive characteristics?"

Cause you don't want people barging into your house etc.

There sorta like a gun, except guns don't kill people, but pitbulls do! :)
 

Colpy

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 5, 2005
21,887
848
113
70
Saint John, N.B.
Re: RE: Ahh these pitbulls again

Jay said:
"But, the question is, why does anyone choose to own a breed bred for its aggressive characteristics?"

Cause you don't want people barging into your house etc.

There sorta like a gun, except guns don't kill people, but pitbulls do! :)

But I control a weapon. I don't really control a separate entity like a dog.

Also, anyone frightened by a pit bull would also be frightened of any large dog, such as a german shepard, or even a golden retreiver, the best natured canines on earth.

And, any dog will defend hearth and home.

My son was attacked by a rottweiller when he was about 7. Luckily he was wearing a heavy parka, and the dog grabbed him by the shoulder, and the owner beat the dog off him before any real damage was done.

I also saw my sister-in-laws golden retreiver, who was 8 years old and had never so much as bared his teeth, challenge a guy who walked into their kitchen without invitation, and with foul intent. He retreated pretty quick.

Dogs are wonderful animals, but I have absolutely NO tolerance for aggressive dogs.
 

missile

House Member
Dec 1, 2004
4,846
17
38
Saint John N.B.
I have owned dogs that did bite people..once! They never got a second chance to do that again. The problem with Pits is that they are so strong that when they bite,serious damage always happens.
 

tracy

House Member
Nov 10, 2005
3,500
48
48
California
Re: RE: Ahh these pitbulls again

Colpy said:
tracy said:
The owners need to take sole responsibility. It is almost always their fault. I say this as someone who has owned "pitbulls" (that's not even a real breed name since it covers several breeds if you ask most people). I now have a small terrier (about 15lbs) and he is the first dog I've had who has bitten a human.

I would agree the fault for dog attacks lies mostly with the owner.

I am not particularly impressed with the idea of "banning" breeds.

But, the question is, why does anyone choose to own a breed bred for its aggressive characteristics?

Usually it is because they are arseholes, taking us back to the top of the post. (present company excluded of course) :)

Well, that's certainly not the case with me:).

I would have a pitbull if I owned a home rather than rented (it's waaaaaaayyyyy too hard to rent with one). Why? Because well raised pits are loving, friendly, clean, high energy, intelligent, playful, loyal and extremely trainable dogs. They score higher on temperament testing than the vast majority of "docile" breeds. They are dogs that will do absolutely anything for their owners. Bad dog owners took advantage of this by making them risk their lives in a pit fight. They are generally great with children (unlike my little terrier!!!). They aren't very possessive of belongings, but are very protective of people. We were actually robbed when we had our 100+lb pitbull. Came home to find all our electronics gone and her laying on the couch wagging her tail as if to say "Hey, this nice visitor came while you guys were gone and he rubbed me behind the ears! It was great!". Contrast that with her behavior the one time my boyfriend raised his voice to me ! :lol: She got between us, let out one bark and stared him down as he backed away and sat down in a chair.

If you want a short haired, big, hardy dog who will play anytime, anywhere and love you more than anything in the world, then pits are the dogs to get. I love my little terrier, but he has the worst temperament of any dog I've ever owned. He does not trust strangers and will bite anyone who doesn't leave him alone when he wants to be left alone (other than me of course).
 

Jay

Executive Branch Member
Jan 7, 2005
8,366
3
38
They have their purpose, but I wouldn't get one....but then again I don't have a grow operation in my basement.


I don't like them myself, but I like the ban on them less. Pits are ugly, ugly, thick skulled pieces of meat that need an owner who knows what they are doing.
 

tracy

House Member
Nov 10, 2005
3,500
48
48
California
Re: RE: Ahh these pitbulls again

Jay said:
They have their purpose, but I wouldn't get one....but then again I don't have a grow operation in my basement.


I don't like them myself, but I like the ban on them less. Pits are ugly, ugly, thick skulled pieces of meat that need an owner who knows what they are doing.

I don't have a grow op either. Most bully owners don't. Personally, I think bullies are way cuter than labs or golden retrievers or poodles or most other dogs. I love a good bully smile :D
 

the caracal kid

the clan of the claw
Nov 28, 2005
1,947
2
38
www.kdm.ca
"bully". this is the first time i have heard that term for pit-bulls. does it suit the breed well?

ban this, ban that. bans don't really solve problems. people that want dogs that feed their ego for their aggressiveness or strength will just move to the next breed, and create the same problems there.

i don't support bans, so i strangely enough end up standing in support of those responsible dog owners, which i seem to find to be a small minority overall. The answer lies in better ownership requirements.

Either that or ban ALL DOGS PERIOD! just joking, but i would not miss the little biters if it happened. I have been bit or snapped at or chased one too many times when trail running by off-leash dogs, usually completely unchecked by those "dog walking" companies.
 

tracy

House Member
Nov 10, 2005
3,500
48
48
California
Re: RE: Ahh these pitbulls again

the caracal kid said:
"bully". this is the first time i have heard that term for pit-bulls. does it suit the breed well?

Bully is a term of affection used because "pit bull" isn't a breed, but most of the breeds the general public will call "pit bull" have the bull part in their name (Staffordshire bull terrier, bull terrier, bull dog, american bull dog... the exception is the American Stafforshire terrier). A lot of these dogs are absolute clowns like the bull terrier in particular, and "bully" is not meant as a negative comment on their personalities. Many of those lines haven't been used in pit fighting for over 80 years. That's a long time in selective dog breeding.

Again, my little terrier is the only dog I've ever owned that bites.