Abortion
- Thread starter Canadian Dragon
- Start date
I don't have a problem with stem cell research per se. However, the problem I have is that the vast majority of stem cell research is conducted using the cells of aborted fetuses which I view as murdered children.
As with anything if someone donates their body to science then by all means, but these children haven't been consulted about anything.
If the research used miscarriage fetuses with the permission of the parents, I'm all for it. The difference here is that noone did anything to induce the miscarriage and kill the child. It simply happened.
As with anything if someone donates their body to science then by all means, but these children haven't been consulted about anything.
If the research used miscarriage fetuses with the permission of the parents, I'm all for it. The difference here is that noone did anything to induce the miscarriage and kill the child. It simply happened.
I don't have a problem with stem cell research per se. However, the problem I have is that the vast majority of stem cell research is conducted using the cells of aborted fetuses which I view as murdered children.
As with anything if someone donates their body to science then by all means, but these children haven't been consulted about anything.
If the research used miscarriage fetuses with the permission of the parents, I'm all for it. The difference here is that noone did anything to induce the miscarriage and kill the child. It simply happened.
As with anything if someone donates their body to science then by all means, but these children haven't been consulted about anything.
If the research used miscarriage fetuses with the permission of the parents, I'm all for it. The difference here is that noone did anything to induce the miscarriage and kill the child. It simply happened.
I don't have a problem with stem cell research per se. However, the problem I have is that the vast majority of stem cell research is conducted using the cells of aborted fetuses which I view as murdered children.
As with anything if someone donates their body to science then by all means, but these children haven't been consulted about anything.
If the research used miscarriage fetuses with the permission of the parents, I'm all for it. The difference here is that noone did anything to induce the miscarriage and kill the child. It simply happened.
As with anything if someone donates their body to science then by all means, but these children haven't been consulted about anything.
If the research used miscarriage fetuses with the permission of the parents, I'm all for it. The difference here is that noone did anything to induce the miscarriage and kill the child. It simply happened.
Re: RE: Abortion
As opposed to what - putting them into the garbage? They might as well be used for science so that their life wasn't/isn't a total waste, per se.
Okay, I arrticulated that horribly but I have a headache...hope you get my point.
As opposed to what - putting them into the garbage? They might as well be used for science so that their life wasn't/isn't a total waste, per se.
Okay, I arrticulated that horribly but I have a headache...hope you get my point.
tibear said:
Re: RE: Abortion
As opposed to what - putting them into the garbage? They might as well be used for science so that their life wasn't/isn't a total waste, per se.
Okay, I arrticulated that horribly but I have a headache...hope you get my point.
As opposed to what - putting them into the garbage? They might as well be used for science so that their life wasn't/isn't a total waste, per se.
Okay, I arrticulated that horribly but I have a headache...hope you get my point.
tibear said:
Re: RE: Abortion
As opposed to what - putting them into the garbage? They might as well be used for science so that their life wasn't/isn't a total waste, per se.
Okay, I arrticulated that horribly but I have a headache...hope you get my point.
As opposed to what - putting them into the garbage? They might as well be used for science so that their life wasn't/isn't a total waste, per se.
Okay, I arrticulated that horribly but I have a headache...hope you get my point.
tibear said:
SK,
I see abortion as murder and don't want to see the "victims" mistreated anymore than they already are.
To draw an analogy, how you feel if the medical examiners automatically sent remains of the other murder victims directly for scientific research??
I see abortion as murder and don't want to see the "victims" mistreated anymore than they already are.
To draw an analogy, how you feel if the medical examiners automatically sent remains of the other murder victims directly for scientific research??
SK,
I see abortion as murder and don't want to see the "victims" mistreated anymore than they already are.
To draw an analogy, how you feel if the medical examiners automatically sent remains of the other murder victims directly for scientific research??
I see abortion as murder and don't want to see the "victims" mistreated anymore than they already are.
To draw an analogy, how you feel if the medical examiners automatically sent remains of the other murder victims directly for scientific research??
SK,
I see abortion as murder and don't want to see the "victims" mistreated anymore than they already are.
To draw an analogy, how you feel if the medical examiners automatically sent remains of the other murder victims directly for scientific research??
I see abortion as murder and don't want to see the "victims" mistreated anymore than they already are.
To draw an analogy, how you feel if the medical examiners automatically sent remains of the other murder victims directly for scientific research??
Nonsense. They are useful material that would otherwise go to waste. They are no more special than a corpse from a car accident.
Do you mean for gender, with female embryos being aborted? That can't be regulated by anybody but the doctors in reality. To try to regulate it using government intervention would affect testing for legitimate reasons and would be used as a wedge by the far right to limit access to abortion.
That's part of the problem with the anti-abortionists, they make it very difficult to address sub-issues.