Aboriginal Cigarette Smuggling In Ontario-Quebec/USA

dumpthemonarchy

House Member
Jan 18, 2005
4,235
14
38
Vancouver
www.cynicsunlimited.com
These people aren't breaking the law when they cross the Canada US border inside their territory. According to the treaty which defines the Canada US border in this area, these people have a "legal" right to cross the border freely. The breaking the law part happens when these people move goods off their territory and into Canada.

The Mohawk "Nation" is less recognized internationally than Palestine. Effectively these people are just as nationless as Palestinians unless they choose Canadian or American citizenship.

Canada and the US could adopt a similar model as Israel to deal with these people and just militarily occupy their land. I'm sure that would involve demolishing homes, building walls, putting up military checkpoints, detaining people and forcing people to live in open air prisons. Some of these people are armed and would likely resort to terrorism. But we could also adopt the Israeli model to deal with that too. We could assassinate their leaders, and periodically invade and level their infrastructure. Our actions might result in some collateral damage, killing hundreds or even thousands of innocent civilians, which we could justify because it would end the smuggling problem. The world might think less of Canada for treating these people the same way Israel treats Palestinians and ignoring international laws, treaties and conventions. The UN might even pass resolutions against us which we could ignore. But Israel has set an international precedent for dealing with nationless people like the Mohawks which Canada could use to deal with this smuggling problem. As a bonus we could also annex their land and build settlements for our citizens. Since Canda has more firepower, these people would have little recourse except illegal terrorist activities. If some of the thousands of angry natives started firing rockets and mortars at us over the walls, that would justify Canada bombing the hell out of them. Since CB is an ardent supporter of Israel, I'm sure he would support Canada using an iron fist to deal with any Mohawk resistance/terrorist activity resulting from Canada illegally seizing their land. Otherwise he'd be a hypocrite...

(Sorry I had to point out the parallels)
I'd prefer that we treat these people as equals, recognize their rights and treat them fairly in accordance with our legal treaty obligations. I would expect the Mohawks to behave the same way. The current smuggling problem is a small price to pay for peaceful co-existence until we negotiate a new treaty which deals with this and other issues, like citizenship.

In the meantime, Canada and the US should insist that the Akwesasne Mohawk Police Service crack down on smugglers:
Akwesasne.ca

Also this link is worth reading:
Akwesasne.ca

The govt loses billions of bucks and does nothing. Strange. Usually when money is involved and quaint concepts like the crown and old treaties get in the way of this they get ignored. And with huge deficits?!!?!?!?

And these are Tories, a law and order crowd one would think.

Sure they can cross the border, but where does it say in the Jay Treaty they can carry contraband?
 

earth_as_one

Time Out
Jan 5, 2006
7,933
53
48
DTM, the Jay treaty says these people can cross the Canada and the US border freely and protects their trade relationships with other first nations.

It is agreed that it shall at all times be free . . . to the Indians dwelling on either side of the said boundary line, freely to pass and repass by land or inland navigation, into the respective territories and countries of the two parties, on the continent of America . . . and freely to carry on trade and commerce with each other. . . . [N]or shall the Indians passing or repassing with their own proper goods and effect of whatever nature, pay for the same any impost or duty whatever. But goods in bales, or other large packages, unusual among Indians, shall not be considered as goods belonging bona fide to Indians.20...
NATIVE AMERICAN FREE PASSAGE RIGHTS UNDER THE 1794 JAY TREATY: SURVIVAL UNDER UNITED STATES STATUTORY LAW AND CANADIAN COMMON LAW

These people were moving goods and services through this area before Canada and the US existed. The Jay treaty affirmed the status quo at the time.

Canada and the United States cannot legally interfere with trade relationships between first nations. However as soon as these people deal with non-natives on Canadian or US territory, then Canadian and US law applies. But if a Mohawk wants to drive a truckload of cigarettes, heroin or hand grenades from Akwasasne to Oka, as long as they are loose and not in bales or large packages, its legal...

If Canada truly is a nation of laws, then we have to respect all laws, not just pick and choose the ones we like.

Obviously we need to renegotiate this treaty.
 

captain morgan

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 28, 2009
28,429
148
63
A Mouse Once Bit My Sister
Although the treaties allow for trade between FN's, the problem occurs (as you mentioned) when that trade extends into the non-FN community. Further, although the cross-border access is (supposed to be) unrestricted, that does not imply unrestricted free trade in products and items that are controlled substances.
 

Unforgiven

Force majeure
May 28, 2007
6,770
137
63
And these are Tories, a law and order crowd one would think.

Not so much it seems. A judge ordered them to repatriate a Canadian in Sudan and it seems that they sure don't want to follow the judges orders.

So maybe not so law and order when it suits them.
 

earth_as_one

Time Out
Jan 5, 2006
7,933
53
48
Although the treaties allow for trade between FN's, the problem occurs (as you mentioned) when that trade extends into the non-FN community. Further, although the cross-border access is (supposed to be) unrestricted, that does not imply unrestricted free trade in products and items that are controlled substances.

You assume the border applies to them. The Jay Treaty states it does not. Tobacco is also a controlled substance like heroin and hand grenades. I suspect most judges would tend to side with you, but legally, they aren't on solid ground regarding trade between FN's.
 

captain morgan

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 28, 2009
28,429
148
63
A Mouse Once Bit My Sister
The border that I refer too is that between the reservation and Crown (or American) soil... You can bet that the FN groups that are 'importing' the items they have are intended to be sold outside their communities to non-FN persons, generally speaking someone must cross the border from the reservation lands into Crown lands (or vice verse), this is where the gvt will attack the issue.
 

earth_as_one

Time Out
Jan 5, 2006
7,933
53
48
But how do the auhorities determine the trade is illegal (between FN and non-FN people) or legal (between FN people)?

If the police stop a truck full of cigarettes being driven a FN person, how do they determine the final destination? If he goes to another FN its legal. If he delivers elsewhere its illegal.

Which is just one reason why this treaty and others with FNs must be renegotiated. We would have to compromise and ultimately FN people will end up with more rights than Canadian citizens. But that's the price we have to pay for having colonized Canada at their expense.
 

ironsides

Executive Branch Member
Feb 13, 2009
8,583
60
48
United States
How about treating the 1st Nations as equals similar to what the try and do in the U.S. In the U.S. there Indian reservations are considered sovereign nations within the United States. Yet all native Americans living within the United States are full fledged United States citizens with all rights of any citizen. They can legally sell tax free cigarettes, tax free just about anything if they wish within their reservations.
 

dumpthemonarchy

House Member
Jan 18, 2005
4,235
14
38
Vancouver
www.cynicsunlimited.com
Cdnbear, you say Six Nations never ceded sovereignty to the crown? Hard to believe, Indians have been herded onto reservations against their will. A new order has been established one cannot help but notice.

The lawyers say, "Oh, no worries, this is only de facto, not de jure law. No paper was produced that you understand states that things have changed over the past 500 years."

It's an awesome charade to maintain, keeps a lot of people employed. Continue, repeat. Legal fictions, unreal realities I guess.
 

kiwi_NZ

Electoral Member
May 23, 2009
889
8
18
New Zealand
May I ask what an "Aboriginal" is in Canadian terms. I can only assume a native Canadian?

An Aboriginal to a Kiwi is an Aussie Native Aboriginal